What goboygo1 said. 1 engine will work, but you have to have an even number of engines (aka, 2 of them) to have thrust vectoring on all axis: Pitch, Yaw and Roll.
@BeastHunter
"STEEL COMMANDERS, Rule the battlefield!
SPEARHEAD FLANDERS, Tankers leading the
STORM OF PANZERS, Battle's calling the
STEEL COMMANDERS!"
All you need to do is create a ground target, then attach a Ground Target Marker part to it (It's in 'Gizmos' if I remember). That should change the AI build to a ground target instead of an Air target.
@HuskyDynamics01
I believe it was removed because it goes through a part of Unity and the program/application SP used to upload it's recordings shut down or something.
I mean, if you make the trailing edge of this more sharp and triangle shaped, you basically get the P-51's Aerofoil.
Plus, this is the basic concept of a symmetrical aerofoil...
@GoldenArrowCO
What..? It doesn't have to just be a cargo transport aircraft. And as far as I know, the only times cargo has been transported on the outside of an aircraft was with the 747 and AN-225. That doesn't mean you can do that though.
@JustMiko
You can, but just as a personal suggestion (you don't have to listen to me), you could add either functional or completely aesthetic retractable skis. As an example, look at the BT-67 Basler with skis.
XD
I saw this in a YTP once and now the joke has come true.
Amazing!
@Tookan
+1T_T
No one in Britain speaks like that, that is just an over-exaggerated stereotype.
@MisterT
+2Fair. Though I did make the same thing on a build I'll release soon, which functions for cosmetic purposes, so :shrug:
@MisterT
+1Very nice build, but you are aware '44', the little black box with the red buttons/lights is actually the radio controller block, right?
@Tookan
+2"Shanks"
Neato
+1@MrSilverWolf
+7It's been known for ages that it takes many goat sacrifices to please Andrew and become a Mod.
@Icustomizebuilds
It took you 3 months to add an airbrake....?
@ThomasRoderick
+1VTOL nozzles
@ReturnOfJeffChandler
+1Yes.
But it still stands that you need at least 2 engines to conduct Roll TVC.
@ThomasRoderick
+1There are vanilla mach-cones though.
@ThomasRoderick
I mean....it does say "mod" in the title.
What goboygo1 said. 1 engine will work, but you have to have an even number of engines (aka, 2 of them) to have thrust vectoring on all axis: Pitch, Yaw and Roll.
+2That's a lovely thumbnail
....yep
@DwiAngkasaAeronautics
+1Ok, thanks
@DwiAngkasaAeronautics
+1What screen recorder do you use?
@ThomasRoderick
+1Thanks
@Brayden1981
Then I don't know...it was fine when I uploaded..
@combatwombat363
Soon
@Brayden1981
In the side on view on the website, or in-game?
@KDnotSpy
Thanks. It was really annoying to do.
@BeastHunter
+1"STEEL COMMANDERS, Rule the battlefield!
SPEARHEAD FLANDERS, Tankers leading the
STORM OF PANZERS, Battle's calling the
STEEL COMMANDERS!"
Can I do the thing?
+3All you need to do is create a ground target, then attach a Ground Target Marker part to it (It's in 'Gizmos' if I remember). That should change the AI build to a ground target instead of an Air target.
+1@Shimamurahougetsu
+2Mind if I do a remaster of an older build?
@LegnaK
Checking in, you okay?
Don't think I can get my build done...
+1@Bryan5
+1I mean...is your sister an aviation person?
I'm sorry, but this will be disqualified due to the part count being too low.
Hm, I like both Blue and Black. Why not do both versions?
Add snow physics to this and it would be great.
I'm still amazed by how these things actually work, and I don't know how they do.
+1Great build!
@MrShenanigansSP
+1B-17?
@HuskyDynamics01
I believe it was removed because it goes through a part of Unity and the program/application SP used to upload it's recordings shut down or something.
@DeezDucks
I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure Apple never had mod support to begin with (because it's Apple, makes sense)...
My childhood.
+2@Darkspoul
+1👍
Kewl 👍
+1Thank you for entering.
@asteroidbook345
Same. I'm still trying to figure out the FG.1 Phantom, it's really confusing me.
What KDnotSpy said.
+4I mean, if you make the trailing edge of this more sharp and triangle shaped, you basically get the P-51's Aerofoil.
Plus, this is the basic concept of a symmetrical aerofoil...
Still working on mine...
+5@GoldenArrowCO
+1What..? It doesn't have to just be a cargo transport aircraft. And as far as I know, the only times cargo has been transported on the outside of an aircraft was with the 747 and AN-225. That doesn't mean you can do that though.
I like it. Thanks for the entering.
+2@JustMiko
+1You can, but just as a personal suggestion (you don't have to listen to me), you could add either functional or completely aesthetic retractable skis. As an example, look at the BT-67 Basler with skis.
Fun fact, the product number, whilst not leading to a Revell kit, does lead to a Hasegawa F-16CJ kit.
@Bernkastel
+2I guess, as long as something about it says that it can operate in the arctic circle.
@bosscai
+1I will have to disqualify this as it's not capable of flying.