Look. Just because someone thinks about something a certain way doesn't mean you have to listen to them. You have your own interests and passions, and they have theirs. What they say doesn't have to apply to you, because you don't have to listen to them. Enjoy whatever you want to enjoy (within the limits imposed by the laws in your area of course).
Also, after reading that profile myself I'm fairly sure that it's meant as more of a meme than a serious threat. Don't take it too seriously.
@GotovoYaTut I haven't downloaded any of the challenge entries yet (to give a fair comparison when testing them), but I'll be sure to give you some tips once I try this out!
One that I thought was amusing was a dogfight I had with the AI probably close to a year and a half ago. I shot down the first plane but then had a collision with the second one, which knocked out both of our engines. There was then about a 3 minute gliding dogfight between us, which ended with me shooting the AI down a few feet above the ground right before pancaking in right next to him.
If you're making a missile equipped with a realistic nuclear warhead, plutonium (specifically Pu-239) would be the best option. It is cheaper and easier to produce than uranium (specifically weapons-grade U-235). Polonium's half-life is too short to be used for any military purposes (weapons need to be manufactured and stored before they are used, after all), and Oganesson has a half-life estimated to be less than a millisecond (and is also far, far too unstable to be produced in any quantity sufficient for weapons use). Radium would in theory result in a more radioactive "dirty bomb"-type missile, but would be a very poor choice for weapons due to its extremely high cost.
@Planebuilder2122 Well, since there's several variables involved it would probably just be easiest to use this thing I just made that's just the radar with all of the variables you need :)
...What?
+1Those are absolutely gargantuan ammo crates lol
+1@AquiliusEpic Oops! Thanks for letting me know.
+1Basically they test planes and give them the official "VR-compatible" stamp.
Also the temple thing.
+1p i g o n
+18' 2"
+1Look. Just because someone thinks about something a certain way doesn't mean you have to listen to them. You have your own interests and passions, and they have theirs. What they say doesn't have to apply to you, because you don't have to listen to them. Enjoy whatever you want to enjoy (within the limits imposed by the laws in your area of course).
Also, after reading that profile myself I'm fairly sure that it's meant as more of a meme than a serious threat. Don't take it too seriously.
+1@MRM19 Sure!
+1@GotovoYaTut I haven't downloaded any of the challenge entries yet (to give a fair comparison when testing them), but I'll be sure to give you some tips once I try this out!
+1One that I thought was amusing was a dogfight I had with the AI probably close to a year and a half ago. I shot down the first plane but then had a collision with the second one, which knocked out both of our engines. There was then about a 3 minute gliding dogfight between us, which ended with me shooting the AI down a few feet above the ground right before pancaking in right next to him.
+1@dogooman1 Beashooter
+1If you're making a missile equipped with a realistic nuclear warhead, plutonium (specifically Pu-239) would be the best option. It is cheaper and easier to produce than uranium (specifically weapons-grade U-235). Polonium's half-life is too short to be used for any military purposes (weapons need to be manufactured and stored before they are used, after all), and Oganesson has a half-life estimated to be less than a millisecond (and is also far, far too unstable to be produced in any quantity sufficient for weapons use). Radium would in theory result in a more radioactive "dirty bomb"-type missile, but would be a very poor choice for weapons due to its extremely high cost.
+1Likely the internet connection. I've had that happen a few times in the past.
+1This is unbelievable, even for you!
+1<span style="color: var(- - level of information body-text);">
+1@Planebuilder2122 Well, since there's several variables involved it would probably just be easiest to use this thing I just made that's just the radar with all of the variables you need :)
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Sf2sqX/Variable-Range-Radar
+1@Planebuilder2122 Sure, go ahead! I'd appreciate credit though.
+1Sorry, minimum for the challenge is 200 parts. Also, this entry doesn't seem to be a completed build?
+1MiG-17
+1Increase suspension damper and/or decrease spring strength.
+1@JustDragon yay
+1Already possible using either hinge rotators or just not
Wing-2wings.The tail rotor (even on real helicopters) doesn't have any control over pitch, so I'm not sure why you're wanting this.
+1As a former mobile-player myself, absolutely would recommend upgrading to the PC version.
+1No, not (currently) possible.
+1Ok but seriously this is actually MudRunner's equivalent of the Pigeon. Smol pickup boi who like to flip.
+1@JustDragon rip
I'm sure they'll get to it sooner or later. Thanks for letting me know though!
+1@JustWingIt Haven't decided yet, but probably no more than 3-5.
+1@JustWingIt Well, maybe a little. I might dock a few points from the Build Quality section if it's based on someone else's build.
+1@JustWingIt Yeah, that would work as long as you make sufficient changes to it.
+1Continuing my streak of not following anyone because of how frequently I check the site anyway
+1@ZeroWithSlashedO That would be a folding wing, not a swing wing. Not the same thing.
+1@Souplane Technically yes, as long as it moves.
+1@speed72s Ask a moderator to make it a successor.
+1man wants us to do his programming homework for him
+1
+1Fuel > 0.95 ? Throttle : 0should workhttps://www.simpleplanes.com/Forums/View/1146332/How-to-change-your-profile-picture
+1Beanageddon
+1
+1clamp(sum(Pitch),-1,2)Definitely tag me when you post it (whenever that ends up to be). That's awesome!
+1Time to abandon ship!
+1This is excellent!
+1I'm sure I'll figure it out eventually. I've been working on other stuff for the last week or so though, so no real progress yet.
+1I use either Discord or Steam (but you need to edit the URL you get from Steam a bit, so it's a little trickier).
+1T
+1Awesome!
+1Also sometimes the lettering they want to make isn't possible with the default label fonts.
+1You wouldn't happen to have the mod that removes the turrets, would you?
+1bonker
+1This is unbelievable!
+1