15.1k Ichko Comments

  • Stopping a rotator one year ago

    @DDVC This works, thank you very much

    +1
  • Me 262 B-1a/U1 "Nachtjäger" 4.5 years ago

    @Attackalpaca Sure you can, but I would not advice it. I use alot of hidden/scaled wings, hidden engines and negative weight blocks. Feel free to try, but you will probably have problems.

  • Me 262 B-1a/U1 "Nachtjäger" 4.5 years ago

    @Homemade @belugasub @TheFantasticTyphoon @SodiumChloride @Tang0Five @Hedere @masotan15 @MethaManAircraft @Mumpsy @emanuelga @nadvgia @tylerdeveneuxmusic @RussianAS @qwerty132 @Ryad @ElectricVehicle @AerobaticTeam2018 @Trainzo @AircraftoftheRedStar @HeavyC22 @Evenstrike333
    Thank you for the Upvote

  • 40K Lightning Strike Fighter 4.5 years ago

    @Mumpsy Yeah, because the missiles are the heaviest single object on the aircraft and are only held by the pilons, In a sharp nose down at high speed, they wobble alot and.....well....

  • Bombardier CS100 6.5 years ago

    @Hooded When I was building it, I hastily just put a 'wing' and started attaching the flaps and slats, trying to get them to work and ofcourse it was only later that I realized what was happening... There was a genuine "Oh.....shit...." moment, but I was too far along to try and fix them.

  • Capitol Heavy Bomber 6.7 years ago

    I managed to make it fly mostly leveled in terms of pitch, but decided against uploading it. You can just bring all nozzles down to the edge of the fuselage.

  • Mod/Dllama4 - Self-Propelled Anti-Aircraft Gun 6.8 years ago

    I have a sudden urge to make a Luchs. Good build!

  • Level Flight Challenge [closed] 6.9 years ago

    Everyone going on about the entry and the difficulty of it. I am sitting here, going like: "There is an autopilot on PC?!?"
    Great challenge, might not enter but will still check on it form time to time.

  • X-wing 6.9 years ago

    @ESpanop Nah, you'll get there. I just stared doing cockpits like 2 months ago. (and I build 1-2 things a month)

  • X-wing 6.9 years ago

    @Sfoster1109 Am... the wings do separate... Group 7+ VTOL. And there are guns on the tip of the wings. Group 1

  • Battleship Yamato Version 1 6.9 years ago

    4331 parts, more commonly known as NOPE! Good job, anyway.

  • Norilsk class battleship 7.0 years ago

    I needed a good target for my Udaloy.
    JK, this is great.

  • I-W-1 7.0 years ago

    @Ryn176 The aircraft is too large. It's there....somewhere....

  • I-W-1 7.0 years ago

    @MaximusTheMinimus Go wild, this thing carries nothing :D

  • B-2 stealth bomber 7.0 years ago

    Before the question starts popping up, I used TRIM because it has a slider as opposed to the Yaw, which, unless you have pedals, will be instantly put to max at the press of a button. Also, the TRIM has a reset button, so there is that.

  • SimpleValley Railroad "A New Era" 7.0 years ago

    Smoke rises from the mountain of doom.... oh, no, wait, that's just my computer.

  • Trollboat. 7.0 years ago

    @FlyingThings There is an even better one with magnets :D

  • Airbus A320-200 (Lufthansa Livery) 7.0 years ago

    @EpicPigster1 no biggie, though looking at it again, the wing landing lights are not at the base of the wing, but I think on the underside. Not 100 sure where, but they are definitely not at the wing base. And also. What do you mean made in ugly intentionally? Airbus best bus :D

  • Airbus A320-200 (Lufthansa Livery) 7.0 years ago

    @EpicPigster1 well, maybe it was a bug for me, but both nav lights were blue instead of green and red. The nose is too pointy for 320 and the apu exhaust is outright missing-the aircraft should end with a black round exhaust and not smoothly. Other that that, it's all good.

  • Airbus A320-200 (Lufthansa Livery) 7.0 years ago

    There are some mistakes, but I wont point them out. It's a good build. I really like the cabin lights.

  • AN 22 7.0 years ago

    An underrated aircraft. We need more an-22

  • SPIDERS! 7.0 years ago

    @SpiritusRaptor eh....sort of....maybe.... if you squint...and have a day.... :D

  • SPIDERS! 7.0 years ago

    Put some buoyancy parts on the top of the legs and you have a water strider D:

  • Flying WIng help. 7.1 years ago

    @Rodrigo110 @Tully2001 @DerekSP @WNP78 Made it fly, thanks for the help.

  • Flying WIng help. 7.1 years ago

    @Rodrigo110 Yes, as per usual.

  • FA-50 Rho BM 7.1 years ago

    I like the inlets. Those are nice inlets.

  • Slavic Countries Roundels 7.1 years ago

    Left to right, top to bottom: Poland; That one country in the Balkans that we do not pronounce the name of or a shitstorm will appear; Slovakia; Ukraine roundel, Ukraine tail fin; Croatia roundel; Czech; Serbia; Montenegro; Slovenia; Bulgaria; Croatia tail fin; Russia star; Belarus Star (Yes, there is an actual difference between the last two) @FlyingManiac @Oski

    +1
  • Simple futuristic attack helicopter 7.2 years ago

    @fishheads88 NP :)

  • Simple futuristic attack helicopter 7.2 years ago

    @fishheads88 The description clearly states that 10% will be enough to get you in the air and the engines been these specific ones are kinda a part of the design.

  • 1.7 Beta now available 7.2 years ago

    I want to ask how the torpedoes exactly work, at what depth they travel, etc. I fired 8 torpedoes at one of my ships that, for a better lack of term, has torpedo bulkheads, yet when I get in close, i see that the bulkheads are intact while the main hull behind them is destroyed. Animation-wise, it looks like the torps are right on the surface, but dunno. Otherwise, awesome update.

  • Battleship I-S-1 7.3 years ago

    @Gestour Thank you for the great mod.

  • Littoral combat ship 7.3 years ago

    @BaylorM Well, I wanted it to be atleast slightly different than the original, this way I can cover up my mistakes by claiming artistic :D. Plus, I like Asymmetry.
    Also, there is vector thrust, but the angels it goes sideways to is pretty low and the effect minimal. You can actually see it if you spawn on ground.

  • Littoral combat ship 7.3 years ago

    @EternalDarkness It was a matter of compromise. If the cockpit was on the gun as I initial intended, aiming missiles at aircraft would mean the gun going vertical and my previous ship design had the cockpit in the gun so I was trying something new as well.

  • Updated T-91 Ultra-Stealth [3D-vectoring] 7.7 years ago

    Love the top-side intakes.

  • I-A-3 7.8 years ago

    @YuukaNeko Nah, I like longer and slimmer aircraft. Besides, there is alot of mass in the tail due to the engine been there and as such it requires quite abit at the nose. Infact most T-shaped tail aircraft have such long fuselages before the wings. As for the intake... I know.... but I cannot mod, I just work here. :D

  • I-A-1 (A370) 8.0 years ago

    @Planefun Nah, normal airport, commercial flights.

  • I-A-1 (A370) 8.0 years ago

    @Planefun The weight is fine, the engines are too powerful. If you look at the location of lift and weight points, everything is in order and it's low-speed performance shows that. Most aircraft are inherently ass-heavy and are balanced with the payload. In fact, it is commonly believed that the more to the rear the weight point is, the more fuel-efficent the flight will be. Trust me, I am a load control :D.

  • QC-"Super 6.0s" 8.1 years ago

    While alot of your aircraft tent to follow certain constant design points up to where you can just look at something and go: "Oh, it's a Feanor!", most of them fly quite nicely and I especially enjoy simply jumping into the cockpit and going on some loooong airport hopping trip from cockpit view.... at night :D. Great work as always.

  • Tu-134 8.2 years ago

    @Trainzo Thank you (just in time :D)

  • QC-5.5 "Burnt Pie" 8.2 years ago

    Interesting description ...:D

  • To what extent can blinkers be modded? 8.2 years ago

    @Gestour Thank you very much!

  • B777 8.2 years ago

    @BaconAircraft Thanks for the engines!

  • A340 8.3 years ago

    @FearlessFabEngineering Thank you!

  • Will someone make a map of the SP world one day? 8.3 years ago

    Found this thing https://i.imgur.com/7PVlCgg.png

  • Northrop XB-35 8.3 years ago

    These flying wings really do make one appreciate the vertical stabilizer

  • Boeing 777-300ER SWISS 8.3 years ago

    Well done as far as looks are concerned, m8, but check your aircraft before uploading. The wing control surfaces are out of sync, probably because the mirroring or something.

  • I-C-2 8.3 years ago

    @Treadmill103 Thank you!

  • R-44 Saber (Heavy Bomber) 8.4 years ago

    Enough bombs to level a city... but can it level THE KRAKEN?!

  • I-C-2 8.4 years ago

    @Viper28 I suck at making "hollow" planes, so unless you want the cargo door opening to nothing really, I think i'll pass :D

  • IL-76 8.4 years ago

    Saw one just today at work, volga-dnepr livery :D. Good work on the build.