First of all, congrats! I can only imagine how hard it was to get accepted at the Uni. And second of all, here are some pretty obscure planes that I think would be really cool if you made them:
•PWS M-8 (A polish light bomber or strike plane)
•Boulton Paul Ovestrand (British medium bomber)
•de Havilland Albatross (British transport plane, but you could try making a bomber version)
•AT-9 Jeep (American trainer with some pretty nasty handling)
And last of all but not least,
•Fokker F.26 (German concept passenger jet, I know it doesn’t fit any of the requirements, but it’s such a cool and obscure plane that I had to include it)
@LieutenantSOT It’s ok, hope you sort things out. I don’t think I’m gonna post the second plane, as it’s very incomplete and I don’t have the motivation to finish it in time, but I think the Plunderer is enough anyway
Hey @DeezDucks, sorry for bothering you once again, but could you make this aircraft a sucessor to this challenge, pretty please?
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/3xxdka/Korean-War-Specifications-Challenge-OPEN?showAllComments=true#comment-4308773
Hey @LieutenantSOT ! Like with the last challenge, I plan on making 2 planes, however, I'm having quite a lot of delays, so my apologies if I can't submit my entries on time or if they end up rushed
Hey @LieutenantSOT, is it okay if I use a post-war livery? I’m making an american aircraft in use by the french (because I was too lazy to make US markings), which didn’t use the aircraft until after the war
Congrats to everyone who participated in this challenge! It was really fun taking part on it, and I’m also looking forward to that Korean War challenge!
Also, one last question @LieutenantSOT, what did you think of the gear? Was it too weak or too bouncy? Because I had a lot of trouble tuning it to be more realistic, and with feedback from the work I’ve done here, I can improve even more my next landing gear
@LieutenantSOT Oooh, what a nice grade! The main thing I was worried about was the speed of this thing since I couldn’t make it go any faster, and I’ll admit that the main engine is a bit over the limit, but it’s definitely not 20,000 lbf unless my sucky skills at math striked again, I reduced power through the max throttle at InputController as to make the engine guzzle less fuel, and if I’m not mistaken, it also reduces power the same way powerMultiplier does. Anyways, that doesn’t matter anymore since my next entry will be mixed propulsion, which is guaranteed to meet the requirements this time.
Hello! Don’t wanna bother you again, but could you please revise the max thrust rule? Even though it’s realistic, I find it quite hard to make the build meet the airspeed requirement without getting rid of most drag, which in turn makes the build unrealistic (too much climb rate, no loss of speed when turning and diving too quickly).
Hey! I’m building 2 pure jets, however, I’m planning on making one of them Japanese as an opponent to my US jet, would you be ok with that? (The Jap one will meet all requirements)
First of all, congrats! I can only imagine how hard it was to get accepted at the Uni. And second of all, here are some pretty obscure planes that I think would be really cool if you made them:
•PWS M-8 (A polish light bomber or strike plane)
•Boulton Paul Ovestrand (British medium bomber)
•de Havilland Albatross (British transport plane, but you could try making a bomber version)
•AT-9 Jeep (American trainer with some pretty nasty handling)
And last of all but not least,
•Fokker F.26 (German concept passenger jet, I know it doesn’t fit any of the requirements, but it’s such a cool and obscure plane that I had to include it)
@LieutenantSOT Ayyyy, you’re back! No problems man, sorry if I bothered you a bit too much, and thank you!
+1@Rondine Thanks!!
Roberto
Miat
+1@ToeTips
+1Oh, for that I will make a better car :)
Muscle car coming next (including the gymkhana version since that’s a great idea)
@ToeTips
T
last message from SOT was one month ago
It’s Joever
Are you alive? @LegnaK
Hey @LieutenantSOT, when will you post the results?
@LieutenantSOT It’s ok, hope you sort things out. I don’t think I’m gonna post the second plane, as it’s very incomplete and I don’t have the motivation to finish it in time, but I think the Plunderer is enough anyway
@SPAircraftOfficial Hell yeah! I’ll make a celebration soon
+1@Graingy Tbf, it does kinda remind me of a plunger now that you said it
+2@Gabriel747 Poxa mano, tô sem cell agora ent zap n vai dar, mas quando eu puder eu te aviso
@Gabriel747 Sou sim :)
+1:pog:
+1@Hahahahaahahshs Yep, it’s heavily inspired by the F6U’s predecessor, the Vought V-340
+1Hey @DeezDucks, sorry for bothering you once again, but could you make this aircraft a sucessor to this challenge, pretty please?
+2https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/3xxdka/Korean-War-Specifications-Challenge-OPEN?showAllComments=true#comment-4308773
Hey @LieutenantSOT ! Like with the last challenge, I plan on making 2 planes, however, I'm having quite a lot of delays, so my apologies if I can't submit my entries on time or if they end up rushed
Another borzoi enjoyer I see
+1Hey @LieutenantSOT, is it okay if I use a post-war livery? I’m making an american aircraft in use by the french (because I was too lazy to make US markings), which didn’t use the aircraft until after the war
Oh hell yeah! Another cool challenge!
+2@Hiimakeplanes I agree, that would be cool
+1@LieutenantSOT No problem, and thank again!
+1@LieutenantSOT True! I’ll be very glad if that happens
@LieutenantSOT Thanks a lot!
@LieutenantSOT Thank you so much for giving me first place!
I’ll be sure to fix that next time, too
Congrats to everyone who participated in this challenge! It was really fun taking part on it, and I’m also looking forward to that Korean War challenge!
+2I live in a country with the world's largest cashew tree
@LieutenantSOT It’s good to hear that!
+1@MemrWii 💀
Oh man, I love these “what-if” designs, T!
+1Second entry coming up soon
+1@rexzion wrong
Hey @LieutenantSOT! Sorry for bothering you again, I just wanna let you know that I updated the XML to meet the requirements a little better
Also, one last question @LieutenantSOT, what did you think of the gear? Was it too weak or too bouncy? Because I had a lot of trouble tuning it to be more realistic, and with feedback from the work I’ve done here, I can improve even more my next landing gear
@LieutenantSOT Oooh, what a nice grade! The main thing I was worried about was the speed of this thing since I couldn’t make it go any faster, and I’ll admit that the main engine is a bit over the limit, but it’s definitely not 20,000 lbf unless my sucky skills at math striked again, I reduced power through the max throttle at InputController as to make the engine guzzle less fuel, and if I’m not mistaken, it also reduces power the same way powerMultiplier does. Anyways, that doesn’t matter anymore since my next entry will be mixed propulsion, which is guaranteed to meet the requirements this time.
@LieutenantSOT Oh alright, take your time then
@LieutenantSOT You ok?
@LieutenantSOT Alright, nice! And don’t worry, my next entry will be the american plane I promised
+1I’ll be posting my first entry soon
+1@LieutenantSOT Oh yeah, that solved the problem. Thanks!
+1Hello! Don’t wanna bother you again, but could you please revise the max thrust rule? Even though it’s realistic, I find it quite hard to make the build meet the airspeed requirement without getting rid of most drag, which in turn makes the build unrealistic (too much climb rate, no loss of speed when turning and diving too quickly).
@TheSonOfThunder Alright, thanks!
+1Hey! I’m building 2 pure jets, however, I’m planning on making one of them Japanese as an opponent to my US jet, would you be ok with that? (The Jap one will meet all requirements)
+1T :troll:
Noooo my little pink plane
T
Cool! T
Nice! I’m making just the right plane for this challenge