1,138 Kaveman Comments

  • DAC-9A 2 months ago

    @Zillyguy2 thanks bruh. This is one of my older builds, though, so it isn't great. Id recommend checking out a newer one

  • DAC-HI 4 months ago

    @GUGUPIGEON I kinda wanted it to look strange, not necessarily like that

  • DAC-F10 4 months ago

    What is this lol???

  • DAC-F9 JET 5 months ago

    @Zaineman It's the same thing I do on my newer builds as well, at least, something similar

  • DAC-24A 5 months ago

    @Trainzo thanks!

  • Sukhoi Su-11 Fishpot-C 5 months ago

    If you ever want to have a realistic twr, just set the drag for all parts to 0, then add a little bit of drag to get a realistic top speed. You can use air brakes to get realistic energy bleed when turning. Nice Build!!

  • DAC-24A 5 months ago

    @SLBROS1 Also just checked some of your posts. Your pictures are incredible.

  • DAC-24A 5 months ago

    @SLBROS1 true

  • DAC-24A 5 months ago

    @TheMouse Yo the mouse? On MY POST????

    +1
  • [PEA] X-15 6 months ago

    @Trainzo Thanks!

    +1
  • [PEA] X-15 6 months ago

    @Monarchii WOOOOO

    +1
  • [PEA] X-15 6 months ago

    @Monarchii

    +1
  • Messerschmitt Me-609 6 months ago

    @SkyFly Dang, only your second? It looks really good!

    +1
  • [PEA] General Atomics MQ-9 6 months ago

    Obama's Favorite

  • Part-Efficient Aircrafts [PEA] & Low-Part Aircrafts [LPA] List 6 months ago

    @Monarchii How would you feel about a PEA X-15?

  • Messerschmitt Me-609 6 months ago

    Also I was looking at this, and I think the glass canopy is a bit too wide and a bit too tall. Not much, but it makes the plane look a little... strange? Idk, I think that's the only thing

  • Messerschmitt Me-609 6 months ago

    I WAS HERE BEFORE THE MOUSE!

    +1
  • F-100 D Super Saber 7 months ago

    @Cosmicat alright, fair enough

  • ki-84 7 months ago

    If you want, you could look up how to make thumbnails for this. it's not hard, not even on mobile

  • F16 block 52 Falcon 7 months ago

    Nice Job, dude! looking good

  • F-100 D Super Saber 7 months ago

    It's pretty good, and the plane itself looks incredible. The performance of the plane is pretty unrealistic though. If you wanted a more realistic plane, you can set drag for most parts to 0 and then you can have a realistic TWR without a huge hit to speed.

  • Focke Wulf FW-190 A-8 7 months ago

    @kiji You realize this is just a copy of someone else's plane, right?

  • DF-F9 7 months ago

    So you're saying, that this thing, has 16,000 Horsepower???

    +3
  • Dossi 2 7 months ago

    @Okaaaaayletsgo GET OUT OF MY HEAD!

  • Dossi 2 7 months ago

    "flexible plane isn't real, it can't hurt you"
    Flexible plane:

  • [Defensive bombers] Heinkel He-111 7 months ago

    @TemporaryReplacement LETS GOOOOOOOOO! TWIN BOMBER GO BRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

  • [Defensive bombers] Heinkel He-111 7 months ago

    Cool! now make the Zwilling.

  • A Cockpit Plane 7 months ago

    You know what would make it better? Cockpit ailerons and cockpit elevators. Just a thought...

  • AQG-MP03 7 months ago

    @WisconsinStatePolice IK right? i looked at it and went "I know Dang well those switches do nothing"

    +1
  • Sukhoi SU-17 Fitter 7 months ago

    Really great job!

  • [PEA] Avro Vulcan 7 months ago

    Great Job! the vulcan is one of my favorite looking planes, and you did an incredible job getting the shaping down beautifully

    +1
  • DAC-J1A 8 months ago

    I do have variants that I will periodically upload. Make sure to check them out when you see them, as personally I think they are incredible!

  • JU-87 stuka Thrust vector 8 months ago

    I never thought I'd see "Ju-87" and "thrust vectoring" in the same sentence, but here I am, corrected

    +3
  • Genesis Cutter-97 8 months ago

    Nice concept, and I like the styling

  • SGF. J-1003 Cargo (1923) 8 months ago

    This is insanely cool. Great build!

    +1
  • matilda-SPFTRS 8 months ago

    This is actually really cool. How did i not see this before?

  • Lockheed XB-221 8 months ago

    @Bubba6272893 you can't call it your first build if you only added 1 part to something someone else made

  • [structure] st louis arch 8 months ago

    The arch is in Missouri though?

  • Vickers Supermarine Spitfire LF.IXe 8 months ago

    It's incredibly well made for a low part aircraft. great job

    +1
  • Antonio 9 months ago

    Thanks for the description. I was confused when I first saw it cuz I thought you gave the plane a human name lol. I didn't realize you named it after the pilot...

  • AYRTON SENNA | F1 Suit 9 months ago

    Yeah, I love Senna! may he rest in peace. He was a good man

    +2
  • B-1B ''EarthWorm'' 9 months ago

    Honestly it's a really good first plane. I see people on here who have been making planes for months or years that only upload 15 second planes or blatantly ripoff someone else's build. Yours is unique, which is VERY rare for a first plane. good job

    +1
  • w8wjw8q9w 9 months ago

    @Monarchii Exact copy. That's too bad

  • DAC-HF1B 9 months ago

    Also, quick question for anyone downloading the plane, could you take a look at the gear bays and help me by explaining the timing for them? I don't get how to make landing gear bays time up perfectly, and can't find anything super useful.

  • Droplet 9 months ago

    If it isn't yours then why are you reposting it? I mean, it's one of the most popular builds on this site

  • DAC-F1 9 months ago

    @teodor99 Alright. I have a plane coming up based on the Ta-154, But I have to get the wings sorted out first. It's an older plane I made on mobile, so I have to redesign the wings a little

  • DAC-F1 9 months ago

    @teodor99 I was working on the realistic version last night, and after removing the rear fuel tank, I added the engine and was able to fit a somewhat realistic V-12

  • DAC-21 G-2 9 months ago

    @SchweizerLuftCorporation It adds cameras and tvs, spotlights, lasers, point lights. It's well worth it

    +1
  • F6F Hellcat 9 months ago

    I fixed it. It was just turning too hard but not hard enough to cause a flatspin. I added 1000 pounds to the front and shrunk the elevators a little

  • DAC-F1 9 months ago

    @teodor99 It would have been at the back if sp required engines. It would have been smaller, since it's liquid cooled, but to offset the weight difference I went with a fuel tank instead for more range