@WinsWings my builds are kinda... Between Cheap/Simple and High Quality/complex rating so it takes a minimum of 1 week for 1 whole plane, and maybe even more so with a special function for the Defiant. So i think ill back off.
Is the Boulton Paul Defiant on this list too? Its the only unusual thing it has for this type is how it has a turret as its main gun.
.
.
.
Oh nvm deadline is june 15th, i was thinking rhe aircraft may take 2 weeks to build.
-"Rebuilding an existing creation is the goal of this challenge, this means you may completely start from scratch as long as you retain the original design / layout. (Engine, cockpit, wing, etc, placement stays the same."
By mean wing, do you mean the actual wing part or just the model by using fuselages? Because if its the former, the rebuild of my A8K has a different Wing Part method from the old one
so idk if that will still count as "remaster".
@Walvis sorry, what i meant was. Converting my build into a predecessor of this post might mess something up with its cockpit canopy functions. Could it be mentioned instead?
@Walvis Im rebuilding my Kawanishi A8K from my first years of replica building back then. But the one i have already has a cockpit and the "non-firstperson" cockpit part one. Can i mention it instead? As it might mess something up.
@AndrewGarrison oh no i never noticed this issue until now! Thank you for pointing it out. Im thinking on fixing it on the already complete version, but without the livery, antenna, Anti-glare, and exhaust. It goes down to 347 parts, but question is, is it okay to reupload that one when it had alot of changes (flight physics wise) from this post's version?
@jamesPLANESii are we talking about this build or historical? If its the former, my Mk.IX i actually turns faster than this MesserSpit Mk.IX.
If its the latter... It was a Mk.V, but yeh they outperformed both of them thanks to the Bf-109's DB605A engine and thr Spitifire' elliptical wing design and being "married" into one one lol.
@parkrangerjerry i actually think its the perfect size, just looking small from the side because of the cockpit framing. Then again...i couldnt fit a gyro gunsight
@DeezDucks lmao yeah, this spit goes way too fast, i did alot of tweaking and i cant find the right one as i intended to make its size and weight both a 1:1 from the real one. The real one goes 618kph @ 3,200m but even then this build of mine goes 640kph+ at 500m and thats bugging me too.
]
Edit:
maybe ill fix it on the final version. As for the method...ill have to find it on my own it seems...
@pedro16797 im not too sure about participating in the challenge anymore and its still missing the livery and cockpit interiors...haha... (I cropped it to not spoil how the spitfire looks like for now).
]
Edit: nvm i just used the less parts count version that i already uploaded as unlisted and slapped some cockpit interiors to it.
@pedro16797 about the thing you mentioned to TheNightmareCompany on the scaled to fit a person, i think it would be better if there was also a holographic scaled person sitting on the Seats, just like a scaled hand on the cockpit input controls.
"and since 1.12 is coming soon."
Wait 1.11 just came out and now were getting 1.12 soon?
.
That aside, this sounds like a challenge for me with my recent successful build during 1.11 Beta (FW-190A-8). And since im going to build the Spitfire Mk.IX next week, i might aswell participate here.
Incase you guys havent noticed, for the sake of aesthetic and accuracy. Theres a smaller propeller just behind the main propeller that serves as the so called "Cooling Fan" on both this and the Mobile friendly version.
@parkrangerjerry @rexzion i intend to make it mobile friendly first, the one with a paint scheme i metioned will have livery,cockpit instruments and something cool i wont spoil yet.
@e_soup yes lol, my aim was to make it accurate as possible while still maintaining simplicity. Although the finished version will have cockpit instruments and some sort of paint scheme so i guess ill have to upload a less part count .
Ill repost the Aircraft after the beta's new update is done, so it wont have the "Beta" warning and everyone could download it.
]
Edit: i'll also make some adjustments on its rolling instability on level flight, so for now... Bear with it (especially people like me who has slught OCD of auto-rolling issues).
@WinsWings my builds are kinda... Between Cheap/Simple and High Quality/complex rating so it takes a minimum of 1 week for 1 whole plane, and maybe even more so with a special function for the Defiant. So i think ill back off.
Is the Boulton Paul Defiant on this list too? Its the only unusual thing it has for this type is how it has a turret as its main gun.
.
.
.
Oh nvm deadline is june 15th, i was thinking rhe aircraft may take 2 weeks to build.
Tbh i never heard of ravenfield until now. It was more "hey this aircraft actually looks cool." And here i am now finally building my own.
@PilotBug this is only a file download for the aircraft, not thr spawn location so no.
@Hazerz La-5F from Ash Arms
@Unrealgaming wait, again? weird, the last time i checked, it works fine on the catapult.
Edit: apparently it only explodes when you outright choose the USS Beast catapult spawn location, not when you attach it on the move.
@EternalDarkness i think this build shows how flexible your fuselage Slicing Wings technique are in terms of making paint schemes.
@JustMiko
@BogdanX im kind of the type who wants to leave no gap possible in the build, but i understand why. Its just it bugs me personally speaking.
@Rompuss62 you sure its not your phone? because it works fine for mw and most likely to others aswell.
<<<Previous Build
<<<Previous Build
<<<Previous Build
@Tsuchiisan my mind couldnt imagine how, id there a video guide of properly doing it?
@Unrealgaming ah, thanks for finding it out. Ill make a link on this post for the fixed version.
@FeatherWing i think he meant the horizontal stabilizers, not the vertical stabilizers lol
@Walvis hmm i kinda have a question on this one
-"Rebuilding an existing creation is the goal of this challenge, this means you may completely start from scratch as long as you retain the original design / layout. (Engine, cockpit, wing, etc, placement stays the same."
By mean wing, do you mean the actual wing part or just the model by using fuselages? Because if its the former, the rebuild of my A8K has a different Wing Part method from the old one
so idk if that will still count as "remaster".
@Walvis do you know anyone who i could ask to change it to?
@Walvis sorry, what i meant was. Converting my build into a predecessor of this post might mess something up with its cockpit canopy functions. Could it be mentioned instead?
@Walvis Im rebuilding my Kawanishi A8K from my first years of replica building back then. But the one i have already has a cockpit and the "non-firstperson" cockpit part one. Can i mention it instead? As it might mess something up.
@AndrewGarisson
@AndrewGarrison oh no i never noticed this issue until now! Thank you for pointing it out. Im thinking on fixing it on the already complete version, but without the livery, antenna, Anti-glare, and exhaust. It goes down to 347 parts, but question is, is it okay to reupload that one when it had alot of changes (flight physics wise) from this post's version?
Finally!! a Veltro with the new Fuselage Slicing Wings!!!
.
Edit:No wait its not! I was convinced it was lmao
@jamesPLANESii are we talking about this build or historical? If its the former, my Mk.IX i actually turns faster than this MesserSpit Mk.IX.
If its the latter... It was a Mk.V, but yeh they outperformed both of them thanks to the Bf-109's DB605A engine and thr Spitifire' elliptical wing design and being "married" into one one lol.
@Fliegerkerlchen is that the Merlin Engine, it better not be the Griffin one.
@parkrangerjerry i actually think its the perfect size, just looking small from the side because of the cockpit framing. Then again...i couldnt fit a gyro gunsight
@Thatoneweirdoh sorry i kinda have plans right now. A MesserSpit (captured Spit Mk.V with DB605A), Vought F4U-1D and thr P-47D.
@Thatoneweirdoh its in the crafted intructions.
As a lego fan, this is truly marvelous lol
@Tang0five should have waited a bit for the one with Livery lol
@DeezDucks lmao yeah, this spit goes way too fast, i did alot of tweaking and i cant find the right one as i intended to make its size and weight both a 1:1 from the real one. The real one goes 618kph @ 3,200m but even then this build of mine goes 640kph+ at 500m and thats bugging me too.
]
Edit:
maybe ill fix it on the final version. As for the method...ill have to find it on my own it seems...
@ArkRoyalTheDDhunter that, i wasnt sure since i dont use inch lol, lemme edit that now.
@pedro16797 im not too sure about participating in the challenge anymore and its still missing the livery and cockpit interiors...haha... (I cropped it to not spoil how the spitfire looks like for now).
]
Edit: nvm i just used the less parts count version that i already uploaded as unlisted and slapped some cockpit interiors to it.
@3 i heard it works, but i think its more convenient to not have to renaming thing in the folder
@pedro16797 about the thing you mentioned to TheNightmareCompany on the scaled to fit a person, i think it would be better if there was also a holographic scaled person sitting on the Seats, just like a scaled hand on the cockpit input controls.
"and since 1.12 is coming soon."
Wait 1.11 just came out and now were getting 1.12 soon?
.
That aside, this sounds like a challenge for me with my recent successful build during 1.11 Beta (FW-190A-8). And since im going to build the Spitfire Mk.IX next week, i might aswell participate here.
Incase you guys havent noticed, for the sake of aesthetic and accuracy. Theres a smaller propeller just behind the main propeller that serves as the so called "Cooling Fan" on both this and the Mobile friendly version.
@parkrangerjerry @rexzion i intend to make it mobile friendly first, the one with a paint scheme i metioned will have livery,cockpit instruments and something cool i wont spoil yet.
@SimplyPlain the only part i can call it simple is how many part counts it has lol, as for the execution you need experience and references.
Great job on building my favorite tier 9 autoloader from WoTB, now i wonder if youll do the 120mm version lol.
@e_soup yes lol, my aim was to make it accurate as possible while still maintaining simplicity. Although the finished version will have cockpit instruments and some sort of paint scheme so i guess ill have to upload a less part count .
You could also use this aircraft's wings to study its properties yourself just like how i used @EternalDarkness' post to study his
@EternalDarkness im still having troubles, but heres the result for my FW190A-8 im building.
Ill repost the Aircraft after the beta's new update is done, so it wont have the "Beta" warning and everyone could download it.
]
Edit: i'll also make some adjustments on its rolling instability on level flight, so for now... Bear with it (especially people like me who has slught OCD of auto-rolling issues).
@ReinMcDeer
@ReinMcDeer mind if i use this plane for a basis of the Corsair? Im thinking on rebuilding the Cockpit and Wings (Custom Surface).
Plane is great, im rooting for another Remake where all the wings are "custom surfaced" and im sure it will look very good.
Looks a bit suspicious, almost as if its the Exact same La-7 Dolgushin i have several months ago.
Interesting, never knew the USN made such thing.
@ArkRoyalTheDDhunter its one of my build mottos in this game lol. Appreciate the compliment.