From 1143 to 1095 parts, it's a 4.2% decrease in parts.
From 55 to 84 parts, that's an increase of 52.7% parts.
This means his submission is much more closer to the original than mine, and:
How much of a diference will 4.2% less parts make in a >1k part vehicle? How many phones will that help?
I'm of the opinion, modifications to prior vehicles should either add something new, or give a good improvement to the past vehicle.
It's a success at filling this site with more spam aircraft clones, it's not much different from those people that re-submit 2 or 3 year old good creations on their just made account, without any modification.
So, I'll not apologize for saying the truth, his submission should not have been done, but I can't control people, only tell them afterwards that they made a mistake.
As for the wrong number, yes, I'll say you right, I couldn't bother going back to both aircraft again and just went off of my memories, as I thought it was a decrease from around 1115 to 1095 parts.
Question: Can we share an unlisted Entry to help out and improve the aircraft? Or does that go against the "Your build must be new, no old planes are allowed" rule?
@ChrisETH I'm gonna be very petty here:
From 1143 to 1095 parts, it's a 4.2% decrease in parts.
From 55 to 84 parts, that's an increase of 52.7% parts.
This means his submission is much more closer to the original than mine, and:
How much of a diference will 4.2% less parts make in a >1k part vehicle? How many phones will that help?
I'm of the opinion, modifications to prior vehicles should either add something new, or give a good improvement to the past vehicle.
It's a success at filling this site with more spam aircraft clones, it's not much different from those people that re-submit 2 or 3 year old good creations on their just made account, without any modification.
So, I'll not apologize for saying the truth, his submission should not have been done, but I can't control people, only tell them afterwards that they made a mistake.
As for the wrong number, yes, I'll say you right, I couldn't bother going back to both aircraft again and just went off of my memories, as I thought it was a decrease from around 1115 to 1095 parts.
@ChrisETH No, he said "he removed unnecessary details", whatever they were.
I modified this aircraft to be different enough, giving it 4 engines and giving it 29 more parts.
As for the 2nd comment I made, I felt confused as to why he pinned my criticism.
For the A-10 he tried to modify, he would've needed to do a lot more than taking away 20 or so parts away.
@JohnHorton I hope you understand I wasn't complimenting you.
+1You could've just said "Got enlisted into the Russian army."
Although, is it the Army, Air Force pr Navy?
I would lower the front the landing gear, otherwise it looks nice.
Air intakes might need some work, but it looks fine.
@DimitriIqbal91 We got it to ten, now we in the profit zone.
Hey, aren't you gonna do something with the link I gave?
@Berryl Hey, I sent you an aircraft link, aren't you gonna do something with it?
What are you trying to do?
@Spaceflower S p o o k y.
+2I love those wings.
Hey, my turn, I'm giving you an aircraft to customize, here is the Kauria: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/6HsF3I/AF-01G2-Heinrack-Kauria
@Berryl Brazil, why?
@SolisOrtus Well, I wouldn't say it's that better, but thanks.
A bit inflated in the middle section, besides that, good looking.
@SolisOrtus You mean simple stuff?
I guess, yeah.
@Berryl I can't post on your account.
Only you can post on your account.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/k0qfnJ/Advanced-Wasp
I just woke up.
What did you modify in this thing?
@Berryl Interesting, notify me when you make the boat.
@Berryl
Well, it can take off, you just hold Pitch up until it flies up.
As for your second question, what exactly would we be doing if we teamed up? Any projects in mind?
What exactly you mean by "Fixed"?
What did you fix? How did you fix it?
+1You need to write his line like this:
<<My HOnoR! mY PrIde! MY lIFE!>>
Sulejmani only deserves to be demeaned.
@STUKAWOLF87 I understand you want to be a Site Mod, but there are probably better things to do than to link one of the Top Mods to a forgotten post.
At least tell me if you liked the Aircraft.
@STUKAWOLF87 what?
Oh, no, not the poor wii remote.
Question, could there be a Universal switch for the Fuselage Smoothness? As in, the smoothness gets applied to all fuselages in an aircraft?
+2@XP I'm really sorry, but I did forget.
Nonetheless, you definitely got way better,
@XP @KnightOfRen Who are you two?
Thank you for making this, I'll using it for a small project.
IS that a KV-6 converted to Sea Operations?
Has incredible looks.
Now I'm curious as to how you'll implement a powerplant without ruining it's lines by a huge margin.
+2Looks mean.
WE FINALLY GOT GLASS! How exactly we had Jet technology before knowing how to heat up sand is unknown tho.
Also, finally I can make Nukes without some Fuselage mumbo jumbo.
+3@SimplwMecanix Oh okay.
Why don't the fuselage cylinders connect properly?
+1Hey, just wanted to say I already uploaded mine.
+1@Mage2IsTriggered Then Next-Gen HESA Saeqeh, to be more precise.
Overgrown F-5 Tiger.
@ollielebanania https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/1Ew55q/Swing-Wing-Prototype-1
The front landing still needs more work.
@ollielebanania unfortunately, I don't have an Instagram account.
Thanks tho.
@ollielebanania thank you.
Could I send it to you? Or could I just drop the link here?
Feels good enough for what it has to offer.
Looks damn good.
@TheLittlestTeaCup No, that joke of a plane still exists.
Question: Can we share an unlisted Entry to help out and improve the aircraft? Or does that go against the "Your build must be new, no old planes are allowed" rule?
Would you be interested in redoing it using the new Cannon part?
@Raptor77 Huh, they're not actually bombs...
They're outside mounted Aiming pods, actually.