It's annoying that the Mirror function in SP only really works with default parts.
I constantly need to recheck my rotators or swivel Motors to see if they're didn't get messed with.
I have tried doing some landing flaps recently too, if your mirrors something, you constantly need to reedit the "invert" function of them.
Also, my recent Roselia plane, can only be painted as the very last step, because otherwise, I ruin half of the aircraft.
It would be great if the Mirror function would be expanded to have functions that counter act those issues, instead of that weird mirror menu that I never used.
@StrangeGameAYT Its weird that the engines are exploding for you, I just did a bit of testing after I moved the engines into the fuselages while using medium physics and it seems alright.
Also, the pitch surfaces on the swivel wings, put Invert to Yes and Trim to On so that they pitch correctly in relation to the tail wings.
Tail wings need to move up to pitch up, while canard or surfaces ahead of the COM have to move down to pitch up for example.
XP-55 Ascender.
Make a Goblin Shark to push that chomp to 11.
+1German Femboy, huh?
It's annoying that the Mirror function in SP only really works with default parts.
I constantly need to recheck my rotators or swivel Motors to see if they're didn't get messed with.
I have tried doing some landing flaps recently too, if your mirrors something, you constantly need to reedit the "invert" function of them.
Also, my recent Roselia plane, can only be painted as the very last step, because otherwise, I ruin half of the aircraft.
It would be great if the Mirror function would be expanded to have functions that counter act those issues, instead of that weird mirror menu that I never used.
@CDTX2011 I did end up finding where it was, Battlefield 4's Last Stand XD-1 Accipiter.
This weird small sized drone you could use in a few maps.
Where have I heard the name Accipiter before?
@StrangeGameAYT Its weird that the engines are exploding for you, I just did a bit of testing after I moved the engines into the fuselages while using medium physics and it seems alright.
Also, the pitch surfaces on the swivel wings, put Invert to Yes and Trim to On so that they pitch correctly in relation to the tail wings.
Tail wings need to move up to pitch up, while canard or surfaces ahead of the COM have to move down to pitch up for example.
+1Longest SP post I have ever seen.
What's out of hand is this dude's thumb.
Thing's growing out of his index knuckle.
+1You can use the Fine Tuner tool to hide those 3 engines better.
+1Wow, an egg-shaped German jet that's not made by Blohm and Voss?
+1What is this account?
The type of thing an Air Force officer would force into service.
+1@TFUMasterchief6865 The 1900s one or the 1928 to 1994 one?
@SilverTheDogfighter Assymetric submission?
@Graingy Yeah, I completely forgot about that, really.
Yeah, the X-32 looks better, that tail just irks me.
+1Rearrange but not remove parts, huh?
I think this is something we need more off.
Simple, yet good aircraft.
One, the A-10 has been in service for 50 years, its a 1970s plane, like the F-15 and F-16.
Two, the A-10 isn't being replaced, not fully retired until say, the 2030s, yes.
Third, the cropduster, or OA-1K Skywarden or Skyraider II, is only made supposed to be US SOCOM light attacker plane, not of the entire US Army.
+1"Be there or be square."
Regardless, its a pretty good plane with the little we have of a real reference.
@Graingy There's two other reasons for 47.
The USAF was born in 1947.
P-47 Thunderbolt was an excellent aircraft in WW2.
And yes, the 47th president is also a reason, because apparently, Trump was a key person in the making the F-47.
+1@Trainz448 Very smol indeed.
That's beautiful.
My 2nd favorite fake car in Gran Turismo.
+2@Fastplen Yes... Because this is based on one of the prototypes for that plane.
And now you even have nose space to put a few MGs there.
Just like how the real P-38 did it.
+1Try remaking this with the fuselage cylinders.
You don't need 54 parts for this.
Could you turn this into a Swing wing aircraft?
Not the World of Tanks Blitz' crate.
When will we get a Lunchly one?
(The cheese is all green and grey)
+1Could you try using Fuselage Cylinders?
I bet this thing's part count would drop to sub 500.
@BRNavyPilot Yes, Stealth (2005)
Soviet Lightning?
Anything for Ruskovia yet?
+1If you hit her right, she goes at Mach Jesus.
Currently seeing her flying at 15k kph and 42km.
Finally, Simple Plane.
Looks great.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qT-NP5LYn2M
Team Fortress 2?
+8Could that name get any longer and meaningless?
Sus door.
+2Putting the Fat in Fat Amy.
You know the retardant tank is too big right?
The back wheels aren't touching the ground.
And none of the flare pads seen connected.
Question, should it really lose control while taking off?
It really wants to go right even after the back well comes off from the ground.
Found the issue, put the back wheel at X -0.2650, and it will go straight.
Sad that you didn't make water landable.
I'm rather unsure on what to do.
I have two already made aircraft that follow this either, but I don't know which one is more cursed, a Typhoon combo or a Scorpion combo.
+1@SPTNR Because Monarchii did the best good job with just 10 parts?
What is this brainrot.
@BaconAircraft is there a way to link this plane (https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/V16VR5/F98) as a predecessor to my plane?