21.0k LieutenantSOT Comments

  • control surfaces with rotators 1.6 years ago

    Yeah, just Pitch + Roll in the control, and you can also do things like (Pitch/[enter number]) + Roll, to change how much they do!

    +1
  • Nakajima Ki-202 Goryo 1.7 years ago

    @Jabuticaba23 ooh another entry!? Wahoo!!
    .
    All good! I don't mind either way lol. I was just messing with you. This is amazing!

    +1
  • Nakajima Ki-202 Goryo 1.7 years ago

    I have another aircraft to grade as well, so I may be a minute, but I'll get to it ASAP. It's midnight where I am rn, so I'll probably get to it in ~12 hours

    +1
  • Nakajima Ki-202 Goryo 1.7 years ago

    This is so cool!! (I'll pretend it's American 😉)
    .
    After careful consideration...
    .

    Approved

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    OH. The leaderboard is just for the current standings

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @SPAircraftOfficial you have quite a bit! Exactly a month as of today, I'll probably close a bit earlier though, not many people joined :(

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @SPAircraftOfficial no XD
    Where does it say that?
    .
    It closes May 1st

    +1
  • Cold War Challenge - 50-450 parts (CLOSED) 1.7 years ago

    This is dope!! I'm going to make a CAS fictitious design from the Soviet Union I designed, if you're okay with that. It's from ~1952

    +1
  • cool facts about explosives 1.7 years ago

    Fascinating. The name and explosion scale is obvious, 0.8 = 250, meaning 1 explosion scale = 312.8 pounds on average, or 142 kilograms
    .
    Also, that makes no sense! Based on the laws of physics, all objects move the same speed falling unless there is drag involved. Assuming only gravity exists in a simulation, you could drop a million pound brick, a Boom 25, a missile, and a gun, and they should all hit the ground at the same time
    .
    -9.8 m/s^2 acceleration down is constant for everything

    +1
  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 1.7 years ago

    Note: I gave you 3 points for the requirements to even it out, as I believe this deserves more points, and to even it out because my grading scale is bad at making better looking planes get a better score lol

    +1
  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 1.7 years ago

    @GhostHTX Hey no worries! This is absolutely splendid dude!
    Probably lol! It's all good though! You are in first!
    .
    Also, is the mistake that it says "XF2J-1" on the plane in the picture, but XF2J-2 on the title and release?

    +1
  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 1.7 years ago

    Alright! Time for the grade!
    I'll put my reasonings and comments afterwards, but alas, here we are!
    .
    Speed: 9/10
    Maneuver: 10/10
    Realism: 13/15
    Requirements: 23/30
    Carrier: 15/15
    Tactical: 10/10
    Looks: 5/5
    Opinion: 5/5
    Total: 90/100


    Reasonings:
    Alright, now for the speed, I will get to this more in a minute, but it is amazing! Surprisingly fast 'lil guy, and it suits great speed for the punch!
    Maneuverability I had no discrepancies with, she flies great, and is very smooth and realistic, actually
    Realistically, it looks real, and it flies real, but the idea of an inducted turbofan in the mid 40s is the only reason I deducted 2 points. Don't get me wrong, I love all of this and I adore it, but I have to grade fairly
    Now the Requirements are your greatest deduction... here's why: Everything is up to par and amazing except, ironically, the speed. The maximum speed for a "pure jet" allowed is 550 knots (1019 kilometers/hour for you), and honestly this is borderline because I know that this is supposed to be a pure jet technically, as it is an inline inducted fan, but I also have to call this a propfan on par with the requirements, which brings it down to 500 knots, or 926 kmh. Anyways, I spent 5 minutes in a climb roughly 3 degrees above the horizon line, and I managed to accelerate until I reached 601 knots, where it peaked, which is roughly 1113 kmh, quite a bit above the limit. But, because it is below the speed of sound, I will still allow it, albeit with a deduction of points to make up for this, and it still places you far ahead in first anyways, and I doubt anyone will come as high
    Carrier needs no explanation, she works beautifully and landings are great
    Tactically, I love the pylons, and it can carry a great load and still land and fly fine
    Looks... hot damn shes gorgeous
    My Opinion is that I love it!! This is exactly what I was hoping people would submit, cool custom designs that feature this era, and you did it! That's a real challenge, I could have told you to make any aircraft from a large war, like say WW2, and you could pick a plane, but I gave you requirements and you still made a beautiful design that suits the needs. Congrats! You are in first place mate
    And on that note, these grades will be subject to change and as of right now you are the vision for how I will grade other planes as they hopefully continue to come in! Have a good day, mate! And thanks again! (Totally didn't save the aircraft to mess around with it later)

    +1
  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 1.7 years ago

    @GhostHTX ofc!!

    +1
  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 1.7 years ago

    And ayyy I love the NATC! I put that on my XF15C-1, bit then realized that I also put NAVY on it... 😅

    +1
  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 1.7 years ago

    I will grade it here in a minute. I love this! This is legitimately what I was hoping for with this challenge 😂
    I'm so happy. This is awesome

    +1
  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 1.7 years ago

    This is freaking amazing!!
    Firstly, after careful consideration,
    .

    Approved

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    The altitude I will fly at to test it will be 20,000 feet

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Stanmich level flight!

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Stanmich Absolutely! In fact, I expect and prefer it to the in-game guns!
    .
    0.01 in XML for the barrel diameter is equal to 5 m, just a tip. So 0.04 is 20mm

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Stanmich absolutely! So long as you use XML to bring it's lbf to the thrust here!

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    You're right though lol
    SP physics are weird, and enough have raised the question. I will not raise this number any higher though, as this is 1946 after all

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Jabuticaba23 nah all good mate! Redid the one for the pure jet, but I'm keeping the propjet one at the lower end. Hope this helps!

    +1
  • (Teaser) Baja Bruiser 1.7 years ago

    @PapaKernels
    No no, no rush dude! You're fine lmao

    +1
  • auto rolling 1.7 years ago

    @Brencool35 ooh, okay!! Sounds awesome!! Please do! I want to see her when she's all done!
    .
    Okay!! Cool, cool, that's what I figured. Nice!!
    .
    Glad I could help!! Yeah, it's weird 😂
    I dunno

    +1
  • (Teaser) Baja Bruiser 1.7 years ago

    @PapaKernels I completely get being tired 😂

    +1
  • (Teaser) Baja Bruiser 1.7 years ago

    @PapaKernels 😂😂 all good bro
    Also, have you seen your Discord? No worries if not lol

    +1
  • (Teaser) Baja Bruiser 1.7 years ago

    @PapaKernels notice something new?

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Jabuticaba23 ofc!

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Jabuticaba23 yeah!! That sounds amazing! Go for it!

    +1
  • The last photo of Albatros ?? 1.7 years ago

    This is why I'm happy I have like 20 unlisted posts for every build I make
    .
    o7 that looked like a beautiful plane, lad 😭

    +1
  • F-104C Starfighter 1.7 years ago

    Forgot to upvote this beauty a while ago!! This is sick!
    I saw one for sale on PlatinumFighters for $600,000. My god I wish I had $600,000 lmao

    +1
  • Bell's Grand Scheme 1.7 years ago

    @ReinMcDeer *correction, it was 5 months ago
    time flies

    +1
  • Bell's Grand Scheme 1.7 years ago

    @ReinMcDeer woah! That was quick lol
    About a month or two ago, I think? I don't remember. I'm working on my pilot license rn, and I originally wanted to be a commissioned officer/Lieutenant in the USAF, but I dropped that and figured I'd change my name here too lol. I'm probably going to change it back though because people say they like the old one more

    +1
  • Vought F4U-1D Corsair 1.7 years ago

    This is absolutely outstanding dude!!!

    +1
  • North American AT-6 Texan (Plat special) 1.7 years ago

    @PapaKernels it's no poo poo

    +1
  • Physics question about power 1.7 years ago

    @Javiatrix oh sick!!! Thanks for the info dude!
    .
    They really need to add variable parts to the engines. Like modifying the acceleration of the engine, exhaust fumes, and accurate changing of the MAXIMUM power of the engine 😂
    Like afterburner and military power are completely different things. Milpow is normal thrust 0-100, and afterburner/reheat is like 120, or more modern, like 150%
    The game is super simple trying to be complex and it doesnt work out well lol

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @SPAircraftOfficial ofc!

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @TheSonOfThunder as long as it still has guns and all the other requirements

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @SPAircraftOfficial y'know what, sure!! I'll allow it!

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @SPAircraftOfficial as long as it follows the specifications, sure!

    +1
  • All Fictional nations, ASSEMBLE! 1.7 years ago

    @Yourlocalhuman also, just a note, it is called the Thunder Hawk Initiative, not Baja California lol. 400 million on that little peninsula would be dope tho XD

    +1
  • Make a choice.(Closed) 1.7 years ago

    F6F

    +1
  • IAR 80B 1.7 years ago

    @PapaKernels
    She's finally done!

    +1
  • HAL Tejas Mk2 1.7 years ago

    This is super cool dude!

    +1
  • LaC.937-43-X 1.7 years ago

    Now, because I liked it so much, I will still grade it as if it were in the challenge, so here ya go!

    SCORING CHART

    Speed 10/10
    Maneuverability 8/10
    Realism 3/15
    Requirements 5/30
    Carrier 0/15
    Tactical Ability 0/10
    Looks 2/5
    My Opinion 5/5
    Total 33/100
    Notes: This is a really dope plane and I loved flying it. Sadly, it misses a lot of the marks for the requirements, however, I still love it an honor it. Ik glad you're back, Flewy! This airplane was fun 😂
    It just sucks that I had to disqualify it

    +1
  • Apple Flavoured Nutritional Product 1.7 years ago

    mmmm sluuuurrrrrpppp

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Flewey Wahoo! Awesoms!

    +1
  • Which Cockpit design is better? 1.7 years ago

    2nd, hands down

    +1
  • YFM-1B Bell Airacuda 1.7 years ago

    Thank you m8! @WhoflerMan

    +1
  • Teaser(Remaking) 1.7 years ago

    I'm not up to par on my modern French planes lmao

    +1