As Blue already said free speech for all but this is a plane-building game website. Try to keep politics in more appropriate places. There are servers on discord for stuff like this
@SuperSix it’s a relatively serious accusation on SP to say someone copied your build. Maybe use the exact wording “Did you get inspiration from mine” next time. Plus, incase you didn’t notice, it’s would appear he got his inspiration from the T18 gun carriage.
Gotta love these champions of lower part count/better performance builds not really going out of their way to put principle to action. Where are you going out of your way to upvote these builds rather than the higher part count bricks? But that sounds dumb, doesn’t it? Expecting someone to upvote something just because it falls under a certain category whether they actually like the build or not. Just let people like what they like and not like what they don’t. End of story
You know it’s superior when you can destroy it in a fiery explosion with just wood and iron from just being a bit off with the release.
But seriously great build
@Jedster I’d try to give you pointers but honestly I’m too rusty.
Heh you finally did it
@Jedster what’s up
Huh
Take a deep breath and realize that it real just doesn’t matter
@ChisP the question is how many they can produce and how effective they actually are in combat. Aircraft carriers are by no means obsolete yet
T h I c c
@ACEPILOT109 yeah man it’s been a minute
Damn I was a bitch
@ACEPILOT109 kinda, what’s up?
Lol too bad you choose one of my builds to try and take credit for. Better luck next time
@Randomdoggo it’s actually fun to use maybe? Idk
Smooth operator
This is so not very cool
F
@Tully2001 unnecessarily snarky much? Maybe next time just say the first bit about a good working game instead of letting the bias seep in.
Welp that is kinda dummy
No
SR2 isn’t coming out on mobile yet so everyone on mobile will likely still play SP
As Blue already said free speech for all but this is a plane-building game website. Try to keep politics in more appropriate places. There are servers on discord for stuff like this
W h a t i f n o
Both
@SuperSix it’s a relatively serious accusation on SP to say someone copied your build. Maybe use the exact wording “Did you get inspiration from mine” next time. Plus, incase you didn’t notice, it’s would appear he got his inspiration from the T18 gun carriage.
Maybe add more rockets next time
@SuperSix clearly not the same build as yours
@CoolPeach it’s like reverse engineering to better understand the building techniques he uses. @IsaacHornblad right?
Sure
The 30 cal turret
What’s with far out photo
Writing*
@destroyerP reeeeeeeeeeeee no Prius reeeeeeeeeeeeee
I wouldn’t mind
@trolman lol tru
Interesting concept, but doesn’t work while the turret is moving
Who hasn’t
Gotta love these champions of lower part count/better performance builds not really going out of their way to put principle to action. Where are you going out of your way to upvote these builds rather than the higher part count bricks? But that sounds dumb, doesn’t it? Expecting someone to upvote something just because it falls under a certain category whether they actually like the build or not. Just let people like what they like and not like what they don’t. End of story
@kukimuki1234 na, the first blurb was
Dang I didn’t know you could get quarantined for fights
You know it’s superior when you can destroy it in a fiery explosion with just wood and iron from just being a bit off with the release.
But seriously great build
Kinda against the rules
That’s a really close convergence my guy
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck I have a feeling you have no clue what it would take either
Cool build and flies about as well as I would expect a plane with helicopter blades for propellers in simple planes to fly
thx for the help @Indecision on this build
@YZK666 it's cool
Plasma?
Thx @ChallengerHellcat
@danman12 no chill
@danman12 too late you called naval aviators pilots. That's unacceptable!!!!!!! Reeeeeereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
@danman12 exactly, naval aviator=better pilots