Damn if you’re going to spend the effort uploading this plane again and again to make it seem like it’s your own why not spend it on actually making your own creatation?
A fully functioning multiplayer would help stretch the life time of game but for some reason everyone throws a hissy fit about how impossibly hard it would be to add that. Then when ya go to ask about working multiplayer into their brand new game people get mad asking about what you even would do in a multiplayer rocket game. For some reason this community just shits on the idea of multiplayer at every turn even though it is the life saver of many ‘o game.
As Blue already said free speech for all but this is a plane-building game website. Try to keep politics in more appropriate places. There are servers on discord for stuff like this
@AndrewGarrison please god add text boxes so we can type the numbers in but don’t get rid of the sliders cause they’re helpful when you don’t need to be extremely accurate.
@SuperSix it’s a relatively serious accusation on SP to say someone copied your build. Maybe use the exact wording “Did you get inspiration from mine” next time. Plus, incase you didn’t notice, it’s would appear he got his inspiration from the T18 gun carriage.
-Side profile is perfect
-tail section comes to a point too quickly from the top down profile
-wings are a little bit on the thin side, they should start out a little thicc closest to the fuselage and then taper off at the tips of the wings
-gear are a little bit on the biggie side
Other wise good build
Gotta love these champions of lower part count/better performance builds not really going out of their way to put principle to action. Where are you going out of your way to upvote these builds rather than the higher part count bricks? But that sounds dumb, doesn’t it? Expecting someone to upvote something just because it falls under a certain category whether they actually like the build or not. Just let people like what they like and not like what they don’t. End of story
@Redvis ok, thanks
Question: Is this with smoothing on or na?
@Jedster well then I’ll see you again in two years
@Jedster I’d try to give you pointers but honestly I’m too rusty.
Heh you finally did it
@Jedster what’s up
Huh
Take a deep breath and realize that it real just doesn’t matter
@ChisP the question is how many they can produce and how effective they actually are in combat. Aircraft carriers are by no means obsolete yet
T h I c c
@ACEPILOT109 yeah man it’s been a minute
Damn I was a bitch
@ACEPILOT109 kinda, what’s up?
Damn if you’re going to spend the effort uploading this plane again and again to make it seem like it’s your own why not spend it on actually making your own creatation?
+3Lol too bad you choose one of my builds to try and take credit for. Better luck next time
@Randomdoggo it’s actually fun to use maybe? Idk
Smooth operator
Ye, and war thunder already is adding Supersonic jets and lock on Air to air missiles. World of Warplanes has a lot of catching up to do
+2This is so not very cool
F
@Tully2001 unnecessarily snarky much? Maybe next time just say the first bit about a good working game instead of letting the bias seep in.
Imagine not being able to read this, or this
-This post was brought to you by illiterate gang
+1A fully functioning multiplayer would help stretch the life time of game but for some reason everyone throws a hissy fit about how impossibly hard it would be to add that. Then when ya go to ask about working multiplayer into their brand new game people get mad asking about what you even would do in a multiplayer rocket game. For some reason this community just shits on the idea of multiplayer at every turn even though it is the life saver of many ‘o game.
+2Welp that is kinda dummy
@RailfanEthan yeah “another one bites the dust” is the beat I learned with
+2No
SR2 isn’t coming out on mobile yet so everyone on mobile will likely still play SP
You should make a scorpion from halo with that chassis
+1As Blue already said free speech for all but this is a plane-building game website. Try to keep politics in more appropriate places. There are servers on discord for stuff like this
@AndrewGarrison please god add text boxes so we can type the numbers in but don’t get rid of the sliders cause they’re helpful when you don’t need to be extremely accurate.
+9W h a t i f n o
Both
@SuperSix it’s a relatively serious accusation on SP to say someone copied your build. Maybe use the exact wording “Did you get inspiration from mine” next time. Plus, incase you didn’t notice, it’s would appear he got his inspiration from the T18 gun carriage.
Maybe add more rockets next time
@SuperSix clearly not the same build as yours
@CoolPeach it’s like reverse engineering to better understand the building techniques he uses. @IsaacHornblad right?
Sure
The 30 cal turret
What’s with far out photo
Writing*
@destroyerP reeeeeeeeeeeee no Prius reeeeeeeeeeeeee
I wouldn’t mind
@trolman lol tru
Interesting concept, but doesn’t work while the turret is moving
-Side profile is perfect
+1-tail section comes to a point too quickly from the top down profile
-wings are a little bit on the thin side, they should start out a little thicc closest to the fuselage and then taper off at the tips of the wings
-gear are a little bit on the biggie side
Other wise good build
Who hasn’t
Gotta love these champions of lower part count/better performance builds not really going out of their way to put principle to action. Where are you going out of your way to upvote these builds rather than the higher part count bricks? But that sounds dumb, doesn’t it? Expecting someone to upvote something just because it falls under a certain category whether they actually like the build or not. Just let people like what they like and not like what they don’t. End of story
Just leave it to the mods
+2@kukimuki1234 na, the first blurb was
Did anyone else think this was backwards when they first spawned it in... No? Just me? Ok then...
+4