25.5k Mustang51 Comments

  • P-51R Mustang "Griffon" 4.6 years ago

    Congratulations on platinum! You most certainly deserve it!

  • Mitsubishi A6M2 Reisen 0.1 4.6 years ago

    Lovely! Flies very nicely

    +1
  • Saab J-35 Draken 4.6 years ago

    I love it! Beautiful work!

  • M1439 Pitbull MRAP 4.6 years ago

    Now this is a good looking build. Very very nice!

  • Ar 460 United 4.6 years ago

    I just found this now and I really love it. Such a cool/creative idea to take modern airliners and give them half a dozen turboprops

  • Flag of Saudi Arabia 4.6 years ago

    It’s not the prettiest of flags but the detail you put in makes it a masterpiece. Phenomenal work

    +2
  • MG-42 4.6 years ago

    This is a really neat looking MG-42! You got all the parts pretty much spot on. Bullets are a little slow and it shoots like 5 times too fast but that’s not too big a deal, makes it kind of actually. Really awesome build!

    +1
  • MIG-29 Fulcrum 4.6 years ago

    @plane98 oh no worries about that. Take as long as you need. I also have work and studying so I cannot build so fast

  • MIG-29 Fulcrum 4.6 years ago

    @plane98 that is a great choice of aircraft. Let me know when you make it!

  • MO-120-RT 4.6 years ago

    @Dacquoise no problem! Thanks for making this very cool build!

  • Northrop P-61C Black Widow 4.6 years ago

    I love your technique of the inlet usage for the middle part of the wing. That’s very smart and now has helped to make my planes look a lot better. It’s also saved me a lot of time! This plane itself is also beautiful and very well put together. Lovely job!

  • F-62C Finch 4.6 years ago

    @rexzion hahaha for the first time in a few builds

  • F-62C Finch 4.6 years ago

    Quite a neat little build! It looks good and flies well. I like the placement of the engine exhaust especially

  • TARS - Interstellar 4.6 years ago

    This is one of those film robots I never really think about but seeing it in the game, I realise the design of it is really cool

  • MIG-29 Fulcrum 4.6 years ago

    @plane98 no problem!

  • MIG-29 Fulcrum 4.6 years ago

    @plane98 yeah but I don’t use Facebook anymore. Add me on discord if you need to ask something. That’s the way everyone on here talks

  • Beriev A-50 4.6 years ago

    This looks good! Did you build it yourself?

    +1
  • MIG-29 Fulcrum 4.6 years ago

    @plane98 it’s not something I use

  • Mig21 4.6 years ago

    This looks pretty nice! You got the general shape very well done

  • MIG-29 Fulcrum 4.6 years ago

    @plane98 I have no idea what QQ is lol

  • P-51R Mustang "Hard Air" 4.6 years ago

    Incredible! I love it when people make builds from Reno. I’ve watched the races online a few times and I hope to go see them soon

  • Ti-4 NGF-X 4.6 years ago

    No problem! It looks very cool with its engines and intakes there, very unique look to it

  • MIG-29 Fulcrum 4.6 years ago

    Pretty cool build. Did you build all the detailed parts yourself (afterburner, cockpit interior, etc)? Also it looks good but the unrealistic flight performance kind of takes away from its appeal to me but that’s just my personal taste

    +1
  • MO-120-RT 4.6 years ago

    I love this! Very cool idea for a build that both works and looks fantastic and very realistic

    +1
  • china J-20 831143 4.6 years ago

    你的飞机很好!有趣的飞行,看起来不错。也用谷歌翻译! :)

  • Lunsor Hresvelgr B.1 4.6 years ago

    This is a really cool build! Flying wing style bombers look great and this one is no exception!

    +1
  • M-71 with D-21 Drone 4.6 years ago

    I absolutely love it! Beautiful!

  • de Havilland D.H106 Comet 4B BEA airtours 1969 4.6 years ago

    I cannot believe I didn’t see this before! It’s fantastic!

  • Novgorod Ironclads 4.6 years ago

    Damn I really love this thing. It looks and runs fantastic. Beautiful work!

  • Fw-190 4.6 years ago

    Very nice replica for such few parts

  • Polikarpov I-16 V2 4.6 years ago

    This is really good and that landing gear retraction is painfully slow. Gives you a small feel of how it was for those pilots

    +1
  • Focke-Wulf "Super Lorin"-ish interceptor 4.6 years ago

    @SimplyPlain you are probably right on that!

  • Focke-Wulf "Super Lorin"-ish interceptor 4.6 years ago

    This is a damn good build. It looks exactly like the designs and probably flies better than it ever would have. Beautiful looking luft 46 build

  • BONK! missile 4.6 years ago

    @Kiduppity I am also using my phone but it’s all on high quality settings. That’s odd

  • Lockheed L-1049 Super Constellation 4.6 years ago

    A really astonishing build for so few parts! Wonderful work

    +1
  • Bf-109TL (JumoJet) 4.6 years ago

    This is really really good. It looks fantastic and flies pretty well too. I will say that I would recommend taking it down and uploading it in around 12 hours though because this isn’t the best time for uploading usually. If you do, tag me in the reupload and I’ll leave another upvote :)

    +1
  • T29 Heavy tank 4.6 years ago

    I really like this! It looks great

  • Cool Propeller engine 4.6 years ago

    Disappointing to see you didn’t give credit where due

    +1
  • Chinese-cruiser-Chih-Yuen 4.6 years ago

    This is really well made. The details are great, especially the railing and rigging. The self destruct button also adds a cool touch with those life boats. It would be nice if the different cannons had different AG activation groups but other than that it’s very cool. The way you make smoke is also awesome. Great job!

    +1
  • BONK! missile 4.6 years ago

    This is actually pretty cool. It’s a little unreliable but an awesome idea for a weapon which can take out multiple targets

  • P-51 vs Spitfire 4.6 years ago

    I know this is really old but I feel like I have to leave an answer. The answer is it depends. It depends on which model of spitfire and mustang you are comparing, which role you are comparing them in, who is flying them, etc. If you are comparing them in a 1:1 dogfight that’s also a different case. Early war spots were far superior to early was mustangs but soon mustangs caught up with the engine change. Towards the end of the war however, spitfires had a further engine change giving them more power, higher manifold pressure at lower altitudes, better climb rate, higher speed, and better turn radius. So again the answer is it depends but if you take the most modern spitfire and Mustang from May 1945 and put them head to head in a duel (with pilots of equal capability), my money would be on the Spit. Then again, the altitude they are fighting at would also potentially change the outcome but I don’t reckon by much. Spitfires were developed further than the P-51 as new models were coming out for longer than newer P-51 models. I hope this makes it a bit clear on why this question is a hard one to answer hahaha (and this is coming from a guy whose favourite plane is the P-51).

    +3
  • Korean War Tag is up! 4.6 years ago

    @fantastekgamer I do remember! Sure thing I’ll accept it :)

  • Curtis SB2C Helldiver 4.6 years ago

    Good looking build! Same goes for this one where the CoM should be more forward. Dive breaks and having the rear section of the canopy move down would be a cool touch too. Other than that it’s great

  • Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15 4.6 years ago

    This is really good! The plane itself looks great and would definitely fit well under the Korean War tag. For flight characteristics, having the CoM a bit further from the CoL would help a lot as it would be able to make tighter/sharper turns without issue. You should also try to make custom controls. You definitely seem skilled enough and it would go great with this plane

  • Don't download it! It's unfinished! 4.6 years ago

    @TrislandianAlliance he could make it unlisted then instead

  • BAC Hawk VI (ground attack variant) 3.7 4.6 years ago

    This is a very cool idea! Mix mashing planes together is always fun but you did it very realistically. The hawk fuselage looks especially great and awesome to see with reheat (would be cool if they had that in real life).

  • nani the what 4.6 years ago

    This looks pretty good! Kind of like a mix between a legacy hornet and mig-29. To make it fly better have the CoM a bit further in front of the CoL. Also, have the rear gear just behind the CoM for a smooth and more realistic takeoff :)

  • ...thingy 4.6 years ago

    This is pretty neat! For someone with limited experience this is a very good build. It has an awesome look to it which reminds me of the Saab 37 but with a twist. It flies pretty well too. Keep it up!

  • Bell P-39 Airacobra 4.6 years ago

    Nicely built! The nose and front gear look great and I like your elevator too. It could use with more custom control surfaces (ailerons and flaps) and the cockpit canopy could be a tad bit taller. Nevertheless, I really enjoy this build and it flies quite nicely. Good job!

  • Grumman F8F Bearcat 4.6 years ago

    Well this is entering with style! Beautiful work for your first upload and welcome to the community. Everything is really superb and I love the tracer combination you used, I use the same one too and it looks great. Again, fantastic work