25.5k Mustang51 Comments

  • A-1J Skyraider 1.5 years ago

    Pretty nice! Looks great and handles really well. One question though, why not make the 20mm a functional?

    +1
  • B-20A Aerofortress 1.5 years ago

    @Sergio666 thank you very much! I’ve learnt a lot of techniques since I uploaded most of these so maybe I’ll try remaking a few. I have like 20 80% completed builds saved that maybe one day I’ll post to here again hahaha. Feels like a shame to put in all the effort and not upload them

  • Dassault Mystère IVA 1.5 years ago

    @sergio666 thanks for the spotlight!

    +1
  • Spin Mustang 1.5 years ago

    @TASTEinc I’d love a full review and a video if possible 😂

    +1
  • Junkers Ju-87 D-1 "Dora" 1.5 years ago

    @DNA turns out you’re actually just a terrible pilot since you can’t even start it ;)

    +2
  • Focke Wulf Fw-190 D-9 "Dora" 1.5 years ago

    This has some features I love and then some that confuse me. Firstly, why no trim and the flaps are reversed. Second, I think the acceleration is a little too slow once airborne at full throttle but I do like that it’s at least not hyper fast like most builds. The claims rate feels a little slow and it’s hard to reach a realistically fast cruise speed even on full throttle. The easy departure from flight is an amazing feature but I think it stalls too soon. I’m not an FW190 pilot though so I’m no expert but these are just some observations. Overall though I really love this build and like the attention to detail you put in. I prefer underpowered slightly to the majority of the hyper fast and manoeuvrable planes you usually get here. Great job on this one!

    +1
  • GCN Tominov Class Submarine 1.5 years ago

    Submarine who does not sub marine?

  • Kormad Class PT Boat 1.5 years ago

    This is pretty neat! Fun choice of weapons. Some auto-aiming with the machine gun would have been a nice touch maybe to give some defence against aircraft but other than that really nice simple build

  • Spin Mustang 1.5 years ago

    Lmao imagine the motion sickness from trying to fly this from the cockpit in VR

    +1
  • Ferdinand Tank Destroyer 1.5 years ago

    Wow now that’s an amazing track system. Beautiful build!

  • Mitsubishi A6M Zero 1.5 years ago

    You’ve quickly become one of my favourite builders on the site. You make beautiful aircraft

    +1
  • Hughes_H-1_Racer 1.5 years ago

    Wonderful build! I was flying at 306KTAS and quickly googled what the max speed of this aircraft was. Turns out it’s 306KTAS. Pretty funny coincidence!

  • Martin-Baker MB 3 1.5 years ago

    This is absolutely beautiful! Very well recreated. A nice amount of detailing and it flies fantastically well. Very very well done

    +1
  • ASK-21 Glid 1.5 years ago

    Very nice! Looks pretty good but I think it has too many drag points since the glide ratio seems a little low

  • HMS-Malta (1939) 1.5 years ago

    @Hiimakeplanes hmm yeah in that case I’m really not sure. Maybe ask on a forum post?

  • SU-35s -Mage- 1.5 years ago

    @OSEAAirDefenseForce like what parts?

  • HMS-Malta (1939) 1.5 years ago

    @Hiimakeplanes I would assume with pistons but I don’t think I’ve ever tried that before. Maybe make the pistons very small and make their range long?

  • HMS-Malta (1939) 1.5 years ago

    Very nice! Extremely fun to do anti air with this

  • Gloster Javelin FAW9 1.5 years ago

    @Tang0five exactly! Leave it to the Brits to make the perfect blueprint for a mach 2 aircraft unable to break the sound barrier

    In level flight that is

  • Gloster Javelin FAW9 1.5 years ago

    @Franch0o1 I love that story of the hellcat drone over California. Absolutely hilarious. I got to speak to an F-89 pilot once and he said it was possibly one of the worst aircraft he ever flew.

  • Dassault Mirage - IIIEA (Simple) 1.5 years ago

    @Franch0o1 the mirage has very good instantaneous manoeuvrability but bleeds off energy very fast and is not great at low speed handling. At least the old ones. However, it had decent acceleration

    +1
  • Dassault Mirage - IIIEA (Simple) 1.5 years ago

    @Franch0o1 depends on the model of the mirage I think but if you make an unlisted post with this plane and tag me in it, I’d be happy to help you make it better :)

  • [Spark1645] Martin XB-33A Super Marauder 1.5 years ago

    I love this! Very sleek design that’s extremely aesthetically pleasing. Very well made

    +1
  • Gloster Javelin FAW9 1.5 years ago

    I love this build! Very well done and it’s quite nice to fly. I love these old crappy early Cold War designs where they were still figuring things out. How could they make a twin engine delta wing that has afterburners a subsonic aircraft?!?!

    +2
  • Dassault Mirage - IIIEA (Simple) 1.5 years ago

    It looks very good and I can see lots of effort went into it but it kinda flies like a brick. An extremely fast brick. It’s good you didn’t make the plane far too manoeuvrable like most people do but you definitely made it underperform. You can hardly pull any AoA so turning and climbing is very difficult, at both low and high speeds. Also this thing accelerates insanely fast. It’s better to lower the drag points of an aircraft to het a higher max speed than increase the engine power. Engine power will mainly just increase acceleration, fewer drag points will increase max speed. If you have a realistic engine in terms of power and you lower your drag points, you’ll have both a realistic max speed and a realistic acceleration rate. Hope this helps and looking forward to seeing your future builds!

  • f-16 1.5 years ago

    Apart from the slats going up, this is amazing! Lovely design and super fun to fly

  • Raytheon AIM-9X Sidewinder 1.5 years ago

    @MrCOPTY I know this is old but maybe the 9X has lock on after launch? Which allows for that? I know the IRIS-T is supposed to do that and I think the python 5 but I don’t know how well that would work

    +1
  • MIK-International mk3 1.5 years ago

    Hello, does the G force pitch control limit the AoA to 8 degrees? If yes, how would I increase this? Thanks!

  • 'FH-1' McDonnell FH Phantom 1.5 years ago

    @windshifter1 no worries! You made it pretty good but it’s hard to get it correct for high altitude and low altitude with just drag points. I use various air breaks inside the plane which are activated by different aspects of flight. For example, to realistically replicate loss of energy in tight turns, I have an air break that has its input connected to the aircraft’s AoA. This helps a lot to balance having a high max speed and also realistic energy bleed off

  • Gold tank for 5k follower!!!! 1.5 years ago

    For 5k points? And nice job getting gold!

    +1
  • Lf-32 1.5 years ago

    @Neruneten21 like a second main wing behind this one? That would have looked very cool. If I remember correctly, there’s actually a couple real planes like that but I don’t think any were adopted for military service in the end. I’m pretty sure the Germans made a weird one like that in either the 1930s or during WWII

  • Carrier Borne Challenge [CLOSED] 1.5 years ago

    Don’t forget to say that planes must be a successor of this one!

  • 'FH-1' McDonnell FH Phantom 1.5 years ago

    The one small change I would make is maybe reducing the drag points a tiny bit (maybe 500 only) so that it has a more realistic top speed at low altitude. I know the top speed at 30,000ft is pretty realistic but having good low altitude performance is also fun but this is of course the builder’s choice. Maybe also slightly less powerful engines for more realistic takeoff acceleration and TWR

  • 'FH-1' McDonnell FH Phantom 1.5 years ago

    I absolutely love this aircraft! Looks very nice and flies very smoothly. Also doesn’t have the crazy overpowered capabilities most builds have on here. Very well done

  • F-10 1.5 years ago

    @egor16k looking forward to seeing what else you build!

  • Lf-32 1.5 years ago

    For the size of area of those wings, they are definitely too far back for decent flight characteristics. I would definitely recommend making them either bigger or putting them a lot more forward so they’re closer to the CoM which is very much in the front of the plane

  • F-10 1.5 years ago

    Again, this is pretty cool! One small tip, I’d get rid of the elevators at the back and make the canards the elevators like on real aircraft. Make the outboard control surfaces just ailerons for this type of build and if you need, you can add extra elevators closer to the fuselage on the rear wings but I don’t thing it’s necessary

  • japan bomber 1.5 years ago

    Not too bad! I’d recommend not using the mods and just the standard weapons so that people on mobile can also get the full experience but that’s up to you of course! Again same thing here with the landing gear but other than that it’s a neat little build. If you want to customise weapons, there are lots of ways to do that. You can even change the scale of the explosions on the standard bombs and missiles

    +1
  • plane? 1.5 years ago

    On a serious note though this is a neat little build! Flies pretty much how I’d expect something like this to fly. One thing though, maybe either put the rear landing gear further back so that it’s behind the CoM or get rid of the front gear and put a small tail dragger style gear on the back

  • plane? 1.5 years ago

    Yez, plane

  • NL-33 (Rework) 1.5 years ago

    Love the mini canards and immediate explosion in the engine on takeoff. Very fun hahaha. Overall though this looks real cool! Nice build :)

  • Lockheed L-1049G Super Constellation Qantas 1.5 years ago

    One of my all time favourite aircraft and you made it beautifully!

    +1
  • HMS-Indefatigable (1937) 1.5 years ago

    @Hiimakeplanes whoa what a monster! Works perfectly

  • Westland Whirlwind Mk. I 1.5 years ago

    Beautifully made! Looks fantastic

    +3
  • BOAC Wright W-2000 [VR-compatible] 1.5 years ago

    Now this thing sure is cursed! Very fun though! Just to let you know I think the left elevator trim had something go wrong with it since only the right one works

    +1
  • SR-72 Darkstar modfiy 1.5 years ago

    @666six iOS so I shouldn’t have had any issues with small inputs

  • I can’t open anything except forums 1.5 years ago

    @korza it’s working again for me now so idk what it was but it’s fixed

  • ~World Dominancy Challenge~ 1.5 years ago

    @Aarav ahhh so you decide the stats each vehicle gets based on its performance and such? Does detailing count at all in this or is it purely performance? Also, if something has unrealistically good performance, would that negatively affect its score or positively?

  • ~World Dominancy Challenge~ 1.5 years ago

    Okay I read through all your posts but I’m still confused. How do you actually play this in the end? What will determine if someone wins or loses? Will peoples builds actually fight each other at some point?

  • F4 PHANTOM 1.5 years ago

    @TASTEinc like a voodoo who ate a few too many AIR-2 Genie missiles

    +1