147k Pilotmario Comments

  • Aerosub Exocoetidae (Flying Fish) 6.5 years ago

    @RocCrafter101 Inclement weather usually comes with high winds, magnified by ground effect.

    High winds and waves are a massive no-go for such ground-effect vehicles due to their lighter construction.

  • Iridium War 6.5 years ago

    @ErvenDynamics Whoops.

  • The Iridium War (The Western Front) 6.5 years ago

    @PyrusEnderhunter Eh.

  • Sparrow Class Ekranoplan 6.5 years ago

    Oh btw the Paternians have taken the gloves off and now will use lethal force.

    Which means that we must ask this: Do we use anti-ship or anti-air?

    Doesn't matter, the SM-6 kills both.

  • Athena-Class Hydrofoil 6.5 years ago

    Looks good.

  • Interceptor-class Hydrofoil 6.5 years ago

    @RocCrafter101 Eh. SP Physics are wonky as they are.

  • Ocean-class CVL 6.5 years ago

    @Roswell Thanks!

  • Niihau-class PGM 6.5 years ago

    @Dllama4 Great!

  • M134 Rykova Minigun (Auto Cannon) 6.5 years ago

    He’s right, you know. @RocCrafter101

  • Federation 3M22 Zircon-Hypersonic Anti-ship 6.5 years ago

    No wonder it has zero upvotes. @RocCrafter101

  • Wright Bay Incident 6.5 years ago

    @Strikefighter04 Idk. Who had a beef with Dllama4?

  • Wright Bay Incident 6.5 years ago

    @Strikefighter04 Why does Simplelandia declare war on everyone that Simplelandia doesn't like?

  • Wright Bay Incident 6.5 years ago

    @Supercraft888 No problem.

  • Joyce Abe-class FFG 6.5 years ago

    Ikr. @Dllama4

  • Interceptor-class Hydrofoil 6.5 years ago

    @JangoTheMango Thanks.

  • Interceptor-class Hydrofoil 6.5 years ago

    We don’t have them patrolling every inch of coastline.

    They’re mainly stationed in more confined waters, where larger warships could be isolated and destroyed.

    @PyrusEnderhunter

  • Interceptor-class Hydrofoil 6.5 years ago

    @jandjairlinz Thanks!

  • Interceptor-class Hydrofoil 6.5 years ago

    @Jetliner101 Yes, but I ensured that it can't do it without modifications.

  • KRIEG F-45D Barracuda 6.5 years ago

    @Ghavin2000 Ah.

  • Hawaii-class Patrol Ship 6.5 years ago

    Thanks. @JoshEraDix2345

  • KRIEG F-45D Barracuda 6.5 years ago

    Thanks! Did you go by another name in the past? @Ghavin2000

  • Casablanca-class destroyer 6.5 years ago

    No. @JoshEraDix2345

  • Legion class nuclear powered cruiser (FIXED!!) 6.5 years ago

    A beautiful ship indeed.

  • KRIEG F-45D Barracuda 6.5 years ago

    Nice. @Johawks1976

  • M/AK-80 Assault Rifle 6.5 years ago

    This is the SP equivalent to an asset flip.

  • Anti-Aircraft Vehicles Challenge 6.5 years ago

    Thanks! @Dllama4

  • Anti-Aircraft Challenge 6.5 years ago

    @Dllama4 This is my entry, and how Paternian Dragoon Brigades establish no-fly zones for enemy aircraft.

  • KRIEG F-45D Barracuda 6.5 years ago

    Thanks! @EnderSharky

  • WW2 Insignias pack 2.0 6.5 years ago

    Thanks! @kukimuki1234

  • Colt M16A2 6.6 years ago

    Wrong M16 @AdlerSteiner

  • KRIEG F-45D Barracuda 6.6 years ago

    @Zippy6 That was my inspiration for the type.

  • KRIEG F-45D Barracuda 6.6 years ago

    @Alpha029 Thanks!

  • KRIEG AV-6B Kestrel 6.6 years ago

    @JoshEraDix2345 Nice.

  • MSC Vengeance (SBM-1) 6.6 years ago

    @EternalDarkness I'm liking the sub.

    Shame nobody would use it. Mostly because when you show off it's capabilities to the world, there won't be a world to show it off to.

  • Battle of the Arctic Sea 6.6 years ago

    @RocCrafter101 Sounds good.

  • Battle of the Arctic Sea 6.6 years ago

    Well-written.

    It's almost as if I'm reading half of my report.

  • Colt M16A2 6.6 years ago

    @Stellarlabs No. This is more like it.

  • Battle of the Arctic Sea 6.6 years ago

    @RocCrafter101 ...

    Fine.

  • Battle of the Arctic Sea 6.6 years ago

    @RocCrafter101
    1) While you may have prepared for a couple of years, the attack came as a surprise since much of the forces were concentrated in the east, far away from the attack.

  • Battle of the Arctic Sea 6.6 years ago

    @RocCrafter101 And in such a situation, a cohesive response would have been difficult under such hasty preparations.

  • Battle of the Arctic Sea 6.6 years ago

    @RocCrafter101
    1) Regardless, your forces were surprised. Just because you have the radar doesn’t mean your officers knew of its intent. Cue Opana Station in the Pearl Harbor raid.
    2) The cops didn’t believe you. They knew the alleged destination was Iridium, but we gave strong evidence that they were diverted to terrorist groups, as many of the weapons delivered were devoid of markings. No NG personnel were directly involved in the inspections. Given that the Iridians pulled the trigger and shot the cops, they aren’t exactly well thought of.

  • Battle of the Arctic Sea 6.6 years ago

    @RocCrafter101
    1) We didn’t establish a beachhead on the mainland. That was never the intention.
    2) Whatever early warning systems you had were ineffective; the Iridium Forces were taken completely by surprise, as the anticipated attack would have arrived via Korea or Alaska.
    3) 100% operational readiness is still exceptionally implausible, especially with the claimed numbers. Not even the Paternian military, a force maintained at high readiness and the benefit of a strong, mature, well-established domestic arms industry, and enough money to buy everything short of complete satisfaction and happiness, suffered maintenance issues with some of its types, namely the tiltrotors and the Kestrel jets.
    4) Koraman-Iridium trade was certainly present, and was a significant portion of trade the Paternian Navy had no legal authority over. However, local police and customs officials did halt a majority of the shipments, thanks to efforts by the National Gendarme and the ICA. We provided information that they refused to pay taxes and the weapons were really there to provide weapons for terrorists in Korama. The violent response to otherwise routine halts and inspections simply reinforced this perception.

  • Battle of the Arctic Sea 6.6 years ago

    @RocCrafter101 About this:
    1) One can usually determine tactics based on their equipment.
    2) The preparations were extensive, but were hasty and thus incomplete. Priority was clearly based on number of units than the ability to actually sustain these units.
    3) The general verdict was that the Paternian blockade was effective. Even Iridium propaganda implies the effectiveness.
    4) Land transportation is relatively inefficient compared to the sea, especially with truck convoys.
    5) The main limiting factor of your air force operations was the parts situation. Simply put, there wasn't enough of them. The only fighter aircraft we encountered in significant numbers were Paternian-designed, CAF-manufactured F-7A+ Viper. Due to the long period of manufacture and the large number of export operators, it would be easy to procure parts on the black market.

    The Aurora and Longbow were in fact present. They were considered somewhat faster and slightly stealthier than the F-45 Barracuda and considerably more so against the F/A-17 Wasp. While there was a lot of aircraft available, most were not operational due to the issue of parts. Namely, the types were far more complicated than anything you've built, and even with extensive supposed foreign assistance, would have been difficult to make without years of development.

  • Battle of the Arctic Sea 6.6 years ago

    @RocCrafter101
    Here’s parts we’ve confirmed:
    -The Paternian Navy encountered no enemy submarines, and Paternian satellite imagery could not ascertain the number of submarines present due to the fact they’re in bases dug into cliff faces and shorelines.
    -The Paternian blockade was not airtight, but it was certainly effective at preventing the passage of a significant amount of material.
    -The Iridium Navy still didn’t do anything to break the blockade because of political factors.
    -The aid was extensive, but was of varied quality. Our analysis of the use of commercial electronics and other systems in your military was known, since your radios had almost no encryption, the radars were of limited resolution to detect military aircraft, and the wide variety of systems recovered from both the islands and from aircraft wrecks.
    -Complete operational readiness of that many aircraft can be found right next to the unicorns, fairies and the concept of a secret weapon that’s an instant-win button. Not even the actual US Air Force, which mind you is a much more logistically capable organization with hundreds of domestic suppliers, well-trained personnel galore, and is funded by the best economy you can find, has an operational readiness of 100%.

  • Epochxian EFX-083 Pegasus 6.6 years ago

    @Supercraft888 Np!

  • A Reason for Everything 6.6 years ago

    @Alix451 Thanks.

  • KRIEG AV-6B Kestrel 6.6 years ago

    @Aeroman77 Thanks!

  • KRIEG AV-6B Kestrel 6.6 years ago

    @RailfanEthan Thanks!

  • LCM-9 6.6 years ago

    Very much so. @Supercraft888

  • Modular Hull 2 6.6 years ago

    @50Airworks Lovely paneling there.