Here are some pictures I took of the F-14 in person, just for fun. F-14D: Completely hollow, no engines, no instruments, nothing. F-14A: This one actually still has the engines at least, but they are TF30's.
@Grob0s0VBRa @MrGreen Thanks for the help. I couldn't get them to work though, although I'm probably just being dumb.
@MrShenanigansSP It's actually pretty hard to put this one into a flat spin even with assymmetric thrust
.
I tried using a new set of FT that turns off the engines permanently after 30 seconds of sustained 25+ degrees AOA at less than 540 km/h GS with full burner. I think it's a pretty good balance since in order to induce the stall, you really have to try to do it on purpose
@G2 That one is the previous F-14D. I might, but the part count will likely be over 500
@TheWeebREBORN I don't see why it wouldn't :v
@GAMINGOTAKU66 Canard tomcat is an interesting concept... It makes a lot more stable. Although my F-14D's flight model isn't the best
@Ded Yeah the F-14 is a hard one to do low part... I might just embrace it and do a livery for it. As long as its under 500 I'm happy though
.
btw y ded big sad you were very cool
@OkaNieba Pretty happy with the F-16, the next Viper is probably going to be a CFT model or some other variant
YF-23 probably no at the moment
Bomber idk
@Ocean70 Eurodelta of some variety maybe
@SyntheticL I might be able to upgrade the F-5C into an F-5E... although I also kinda want to remake it from scratch
@TheWeebREBORN That is true, it gains energy really quickly, which is good. I guess it's not always about low-speed nose authority if you can stay fast.
If it's going to go stand toe-to-toe with an F-22, it needs more maneuverability, especially in the low speed. I was able to get ~20 degrees pitch rate and ~18 degrees AOA at ~600 km/h, but an F-16 and F-22 can get 20-25 degrees pitch rate, with the F-22 having even higher AOA.
Making the COM and COL being closer together and making the canards flat bottom wings might help.
@TheWeebREBORN Are you using the AAM-4? I added it to the WBD if you want to use the latest version
It's just a rescaled vanilla Interceptor with roughly the same XML as the AMRAAM
@V I already used the permanent engine stall solution, but I'll try that
- Scrambled, Ramsay or YSAC style
- Pretty long
- My F-15
- Most sandwiches: sourdough, Grilled Cheese: shokupan/white
- Windows
- cool and good
+2Here are some pictures I took of the F-14 in person, just for fun.
F-14D: Completely hollow, no engines, no instruments, nothing.
F-14A: This one actually still has the engines at least, but they are TF30's.
Here's my submission.
It's not a successor yet, but I asked a mod to change it.
+1@TheCommentaryGuy @Winterfield @PlayMinecraft
@AdmiralWheatman @offiry @SyntheticL
@SCPCalebkid @Winterfield @Titaninfernal1
@donkski @TRD6932 @SELWYN101
@MrShenanigansSP @TheCommentaryGuy @BeastHunter
+3@Grob0s0VBRa @MrGreen Thanks for the help. I couldn't get them to work though, although I'm probably just being dumb.
@MrShenanigansSP It's actually pretty hard to put this one into a flat spin even with assymmetric thrust
.
+2I tried using a new set of FT that turns off the engines permanently after 30 seconds of sustained 25+ degrees AOA at less than 540 km/h GS with full burner. I think it's a pretty good balance since in order to induce the stall, you really have to try to do it on purpose
Here's the current code. The engine input is multiplied by this:
1-(GS > 25 & smooth(RollAngle,.01)<0 ? clamp01(abs(round(smooth(AngleOfAttack/50,.01)))) : 0)
The roll angle bit is arbitrary, but it makes only one engine stall at a time.
@Inuyasha8215 An-22?
Just like the old phantom phaceoff from a while back
.
Now that i think about it, wiimini never posted (or phinished) his
April fools was 3 months ago, bub.
+1Sauce's F-16C
+1Fuselage control surfaces in general do not work, including airbrakes. A hidden airbrake will help tho
+1there is a fulcrum among us
+1Zoom pls
Landing gear
+4@SoupTime9957 They are automatic, starting to sweep at around 720 kmh and fully back by about mach 1
Do you ever just look at real life objects and think about how it would be made using SP fuselages
+5At least one works :P
+1@G2 That one is the previous F-14D. I might, but the part count will likely be over 500
+1@TheWeebREBORN I don't see why it wouldn't :v
@GAMINGOTAKU66 Canard tomcat is an interesting concept... It makes a lot more stable. Although my F-14D's flight model isn't the best
🔥👌
+2Yooo
+4"You humans will be sorely missed"
- Jundroo on improved AI
Andrewnium: ???,???
+1@GAMINGOTAKU66 just above, still under 500
The mods could be any one of us.
+1It could be you.
It could be me.
IT COULD EVEN BE
Spine Breaker (tm)
Ỳ̴͈ọ̵͓͠u̶̙̐̆r̴̬̾́͜ ̷̫̦̈́a̴̧͂c̷͉̆ţ̵̎ĩ̴̛̩ỏ̵͉̟͐ņ̴̹͊̾s̵̠̳̈́͋ ̷̭̳͑͠h̴̳̗̊ȁ̵̙v̷̮̪͊̆ě̸̖̋͜ ̶̡̱̔c̸̖̉ō̶̳͍͗ǹ̵̗̞́s̵̼͆̚ę̵̉q̷͙̏̑u̶̝̦͛̅é̴͍n̸̺̈́̉c̶̨̽è̴͙͠ş̸̖̇
+1venus
+2@ALTMTR oh that'd be easy then
+2Just Restart Here but without resetting everything else
That'd be hard to program to be compatible with custom weapons
+2@Ded Yeah the F-14 is a hard one to do low part... I might just embrace it and do a livery for it. As long as its under 500 I'm happy though
+1.
btw y ded big sad you were very cool
Landing challenges with RTX???
@OkaNieba Pretty happy with the F-16, the next Viper is probably going to be a CFT model or some other variant
+1YF-23 probably no at the moment
Bomber idk
@Ocean70 Eurodelta of some variety maybe
@SyntheticL I might be able to upgrade the F-5C into an F-5E... although I also kinda want to remake it from scratch
Updated Part Count: 400+ w/ 4x AIM-54C :(
@TheWeebREBORN That is true, it gains energy really quickly, which is good. I guess it's not always about low-speed nose authority if you can stay fast.
If it's going to go stand toe-to-toe with an F-22, it needs more maneuverability, especially in the low speed. I was able to get ~20 degrees pitch rate and ~18 degrees AOA at ~600 km/h, but an F-16 and F-22 can get 20-25 degrees pitch rate, with the F-22 having even higher AOA.
+3Making the COM and COL being closer together and making the canards flat bottom wings might help.
@BeastHunter i don't plan on doing it since this is a late A-model. Most F-14A's at this point had them disabled or welded shut.
+3@GAMINGOTAKU66 of course
@TheWeebREBORN Are you using the AAM-4? I added it to the WBD if you want to use the latest version
It's just a rescaled vanilla Interceptor with roughly the same XML as the AMRAAM
SP has been crashing a lot for me in the builder. More than 20+ times per session.
+1
+3FireAndForgetfor missiles plsFan. Bloody. Tastic.
+1F15 pfp gang
Is that... Seven Nation Army but not the remix?
+1A rare sight to behold
@TheWeebREBORN godzilla?
I think this and the raptor should be similar in pitch rate except at low speed where the raptor is superior
2013/14ish era F1?
+1p u l l u p
+4T E R R A I N
T E R R A I N
p u l l u p
p u l l u p
bankanglebankangle