Would you like the feed to be spammed with label pixel art?
Although, yeah, it should be added to the rules if mods are removing that kind of stuff. Because the only mention of that is the post on the whole Andrewism situation.
Idk, but my guess is he looked up Convair XB-52 in Google and picked whatever images he could find.
He probably didn't realize it was SP.
Either way, not cool.
@ZeroWithSlashedO oh yeah it would be two...
I still use regular cockpit blocks as the cockpit camera so I got confused
Idk, just try it and see what happens
@ZeroWithSlashedO it's just one, but I forgot to mention for it to work, the camera has to physically change direction for it to work
It's like what you did in the High Off Boresight video you made, just replace that flight computer with a camera with Missile Locking set to Yes
I found this out when I was messing with the TGP on my A-10
I know this is old, but I made an accidental discovery and thought about this post.
If you have a camera block set to cockpit with Missile Locking set to Yes, it will lock like the normal cockpit block based on where it is looking.
So you might be able to install the HMCS by having the cockpit in the plane (not moving) and having a camera block do the locking.
It's very popular (TOPGUN? idk), but out of all the other popular planes like the F-4 Phantom, P-51, Su-27 variants, and F-15, the Tomcat one of the harder ones to make due to the overall shape and swing-wings.
@JamezTV well akshulee
This has a universal C-type wing because it has the extra slots for a 20mm hispano or 50 cal M2. Although afaik, the C-type wing was never fitted to anything before the Mk.V. Granted, it is indeed in a B-configuration with 2 20's and 4 7.7's.
A small innaccuracy, but still a beautiful spit, the blending of the wing into the fuselage is very well done.
I like the LORE and that blueprint is clean asf.
Definitely an interesting reason to use a pedestal-wing design.
Edit: Also, nice job sticking to the Blackburn aesthetic
Low-part simple creations would make good adversaries. Hell, if someone makes another combat challenges mod, builds like this would be perfect for enemies.
You can spawn a couple, but it won't lag because they're so simple. And they don't need high part counts either since you're not flying them.
My name's
+3not
Riiiick
massScale=0
+2jumps
Bye see yall in space
Aggressor raptor?
+2If it's like the U-2, those long wings should have a lot of space for ordnance.
Attacker
A collab video would be cool
Prolly the best way to do it, it'll look the best and won't lag up MP. And you can use higher part builds.
@SnoWFLakE0s Thanks! Quite the praise from the god of FT himself
I figured the wheel floating had to do with the rescaling. I'll try that.
What program is that?
s🅱️inotto
I'm gonna guess liftScale is super high?
Cybertruck!
The name is genius
When the enemy calls it out, they have to admit that they hate themselves and it confuses everyone on the radio
I don't see why not
+2See if you can add the invasion stripes, I think it'd look nice
@ZeroWithSlashedO oh
Maybe idk
You mean missiles firing after being dropped?
ignitionDelay is used for that
They dont make lizards like they used to, do they?
Prehistoric times were crazy
Would you like the feed to be spammed with label pixel art?
+3Although, yeah, it should be added to the rules if mods are removing that kind of stuff. Because the only mention of that is the post on the whole Andrewism situation.
I still think Jundroo should still just add a headline on the mod section saying mobile mods aren't feasable and a link to a post that says why.
+5I bet this won't last more than 10 seconds over the county line
+8jamsplen no longer greer? :o
+4@ThatKindaWeeb I don't see why not :v
Idk, but my guess is he looked up Convair XB-52 in Google and picked whatever images he could find.
+3He probably didn't realize it was SP.
Either way, not cool.
Tuscany?
+1@ZeroWithSlashedO Damn... worth a shot tho
l i f e i s a r a c e a n d w e a r e t h e r a c i s t s
+4nice forgfruit
@rexzion ngl, if I had the choice to fly one or the other
+1I'd take the frogfoot
@ZeroWithSlashedO oh yeah it would be two...
I still use regular cockpit blocks as the cockpit camera so I got confused
Idk, just try it and see what happens
For those curious, the part count is lower than expected, at around 370-390 depending loadout.
@ZeroWithSlashedO it's just one, but I forgot to mention for it to work, the camera has to physically change direction for it to work
It's like what you did in the High Off Boresight video you made, just replace that flight computer with a camera with Missile Locking set to Yes
I found this out when I was messing with the TGP on my A-10
@ZeroWithSlashedO the cockpit would have its camera disabled, it's just there to pick up the flight data for your other systems in this setup
I think sometimes we forget how revolutionary the Wii was. Amazing console, it was.
+1I know this is old, but I made an accidental discovery and thought about this post.
If you have a camera block set to cockpit with Missile Locking set to Yes, it will lock like the normal cockpit block based on where it is looking.
So you might be able to install the HMCS by having the cockpit in the plane (not moving) and having a camera block do the locking.
@rexzion okie dokie
Still working on mine
The A-10 has a titanium bathtub.
+15Literally every modern anti-air system laughs.
It's very popular (TOPGUN? idk), but out of all the other popular planes like the F-4 Phantom, P-51, Su-27 variants, and F-15, the Tomcat one of the harder ones to make due to the overall shape and swing-wings.
+2CLAAAAARKSON!!!!
@JamezTV well akshulee
+1This has a universal C-type wing because it has the extra slots for a 20mm hispano or 50 cal M2. Although afaik, the C-type wing was never fitted to anything before the Mk.V. Granted, it is indeed in a B-configuration with 2 20's and 4 7.7's.
A small innaccuracy, but still a beautiful spit, the blending of the wing into the fuselage is very well done.
kok
@Star737 Funny you mention that because F1 cars are designed to do the exact opposite of flying.
+4F-16 is definitely easier to build, but choose what you like
Thanks devs!
+20The truth is it was rigged from the start.
@MOPCKOEDNISHE It works now 👍
I Can't Believe it's not Margarine
+1(butter)
@SoupTime9957 Thought about it. It would be good paneling practice since it's not nearly as complex in shapes as other stealth aircraft.
I like the LORE and that blueprint is clean asf.
+6Definitely an interesting reason to use a pedestal-wing design.
Edit: Also, nice job sticking to the Blackburn aesthetic
Low-part simple creations would make good adversaries. Hell, if someone makes another combat challenges mod, builds like this would be perfect for enemies.
+2You can spawn a couple, but it won't lag because they're so simple. And they don't need high part counts either since you're not flying them.
The hump on top could be smoother but I'm assuming that's WIP?
Next: Windows 10 in SP
+3@MOPCKOEDNISHE 3rd person. The zoom reset still works when paused though.
JF-17, A-10C, Su-25