I just do this with direct impact missiles possessing 0.3-0.4 explosionScale. Doesn't immediately kill whatever it hits. Especially bigger AI's spawned.
.
But then again, you can use proxdetonation to better simulate realistic damage on targets whilst keeping explosionScale untouched, as said by @ZeroWithSlashedO
@SnapTite Let me point out a few things that you mentioned here.
- OP is not a native English speaker, and uses a translator to get things in order with the description. It's bound to make mistakes. Whether they can just copypasta an entire wikipedia page just for this purpose or not, is entirely by their choice.
- Physics realism in SimplePlanes was never the best. Nor is any flight simulator's. The ludicrous numbers are highly likely just what they are for compensation in flight performance due to, again, this game's physics being complete balls and how this fighter was built in the first place by the OP.
- You're making a big deal out of small things that can easily be corrected. I don't think it would hurt you to criticize people without indirectly calling them out for and implying that they're dumb.
- And since you seem to be more on the well educated side, why don't you try your hand at building a realistic Fw-190 because you feel quite passionate about it.
.
I acknowledge that Sergio666 has flaws in building (and I still can't quite get over the low vertical offset of the pilot camera) but you have to admit that there was effort put in. Let alone making the build appear decent. It still needs a ton of work, that can't be denied. But the way you presented your criticism on this is downright just trying to make him look bad for little stuff.
@ToeTips lol I really don't build at all. Even if I do it's just one thing and that's it for the rest of the year. Most of my stuff are modified pre-existing builds of others.
You take a look for yourself what I got in store.
Just a little suggestion for you:
Try using the non-functional second gun as a tracer simulator like how I did with the modified version of this. The tracer gun won't deal any damage since it's just meant to imitate spacing between the lit rounds, and the actual gun that fires has a grey/dark grey and very downscaled bulletScale which does the real damage
@Yeetbox You've been harassing me over a few comment sections for the past days and it's getting annoying. I never solicited for your judgement nor a lecture. I didn't block you at those times since I thought you were just a troll trying to put the laughs in, but it's pretty clear now that you have something against me. I could care less who you are, but I won't stand and take shit from you anymore.
@DriftSalad Depends. There's a saying that the plane is only as good as it's pilot. So if you're dumb enough to miss with the gun at 20 meters, I'd say no.
Doesn't matter if you did it on accident or deliberately. You just have to carefully watch next time where your finger goes(If you're on mobile) or where your cursor is really hovering over(If you're on PC)
.
No point in making a huge deal out of it. The mirror option has it's uses, but only in certain cases. The major point here is that you just need to be more careful. You can't get those 10 hours back anymore and neither the time you put into making this forum post, so just move up and go again. If you don't feel like it for now, then don't.
@Mastereldo Well I guess it's all on you then. But the most resource-efficient method would be fuselage blocks than text decals. You're better off with 30+ blocks for cosmetics than 3 detailed decals that make your device have a level 20 seizure
@IceCraftGaming That or implement a new fuselage paint system
Can't deny that there'll be those who'll paint an obvious penis on the sides of their jets but the moderators are here for a reason-
@LuminoxBiotechCompany Still can't deny though that either way both are modeled after the F-16 since the T-50 involved Lockheed Martin in it's development
@Kangy You can set the canopy colors to be one-way via XML
+1That way only the tint can be seen from the outside, but not from inside.
I just do this with direct impact missiles possessing 0.3-0.4
explosionScale. Doesn't immediately kill whatever it hits. Especially bigger AI's spawned..
But then again, you can use
proxdetonationto better simulate realistic damage on targets whilst keepingexplosionScaleuntouched, as said by @ZeroWithSlashedO@SnapTite Let me point out a few things that you mentioned here.
+2- OP is not a native English speaker, and uses a translator to get things in order with the description. It's bound to make mistakes. Whether they can just copypasta an entire wikipedia page just for this purpose or not, is entirely by their choice.
- Physics realism in SimplePlanes was never the best. Nor is any flight simulator's. The ludicrous numbers are highly likely just what they are for compensation in flight performance due to, again, this game's physics being complete balls and how this fighter was built in the first place by the OP.
- You're making a big deal out of small things that can easily be corrected. I don't think it would hurt you to criticize people without indirectly calling them out for and implying that they're dumb.
- And since you seem to be more on the well educated side, why don't you try your hand at building a realistic Fw-190 because you feel quite passionate about it.
.
I acknowledge that Sergio666 has flaws in building (and I still can't quite get over the low vertical offset of the pilot camera) but you have to admit that there was effort put in. Let alone making the build appear decent. It still needs a ton of work, that can't be denied. But the way you presented your criticism on this is downright just trying to make him look bad for little stuff.
I still can't see how she's a cabbage when she strongly resembles a radish more
+1@ToeTips lol I really don't build at all. Even if I do it's just one thing and that's it for the rest of the year. Most of my stuff are modified pre-existing builds of others.
You take a look for yourself what I got in store.
Call artillery on their positions next time
Adds realism to it. Even better with A-10 airstrikes
Who would've thought a tractor with a tank gun would become legendary
+1I don't build but I sure as hell like listening to music
Just post one R44 with the custom rotors and one with stock. That way everyone wins. Submit one as unlisted and link it through your main post.
+3Pencil Vania
+1Hiatus.
Google Translate suddenly decided that Indonesian is now Spanish
+1See what happens when you fly over Chernoblyat? This happens.
+4yuo eegnor kol to armi, yuo end up hier.
Aleksandr, play Russia anthem.
+5@mahardika - For the CERIS SAM platform rig that I mounted the MRAM pods onto
@ShirakamiShimada Did someone say
SEGGS???
Just a little suggestion for you:
+3Try using the non-functional second gun as a tracer simulator like how I did with the modified version of this. The tracer gun won't deal any damage since it's just meant to imitate spacing between the lit rounds, and the actual gun that fires has a grey/dark grey and very downscaled
bulletScalewhich does the real damage@HoshimachiSuiseiMyBeloved
A
+1@ReinMcDeer - For the F-14B base
@BlinIndustry
@KudaOni
@Inuyasha8215
@Anomalocaris
@GranRemodeler
@OkaNieba I put the fictional tag up for a reason.
+1@ReinMcDeer - MiG-29A Fulcrum base
bugg vey
@Yeetbox You've been harassing me over a few comment sections for the past days and it's getting annoying. I never solicited for your judgement nor a lecture. I didn't block you at those times since I thought you were just a troll trying to put the laughs in, but it's pretty clear now that you have something against me. I could care less who you are, but I won't stand and take shit from you anymore.
@BaconAircraft
We got another one down below
He looks pretty healthy
Messerschmitt MiG-18 Fagot Hornet
@DriftSalad Depends. There's a saying that the plane is only as good as it's pilot. So if you're dumb enough to miss with the gun at 20 meters, I'd say no.
When Gajingle does the thing
+2Rheinmetalln't
Doesn't matter if you did it on accident or deliberately. You just have to carefully watch next time where your finger goes(If you're on mobile) or where your cursor is really hovering over(If you're on PC)
+4.
No point in making a huge deal out of it. The mirror option has it's uses, but only in certain cases. The major point here is that you just need to be more careful. You can't get those 10 hours back anymore and neither the time you put into making this forum post, so just move up and go again. If you don't feel like it for now, then don't.
fokr doctor 1
th red brn
@Magnavox20MS233S increase render distance
@asteroidbook345 No girlfriend no problem
+1Our economy's level of income could never
+1Did it have +200 airbrakes glued onto it's fuselage
+3Next up
How to circumvent the tax system with an AIM-120D AMRAAM
+1@Mastereldo Well I guess it's all on you then. But the most resource-efficient method would be fuselage blocks than text decals. You're better off with 30+ blocks for cosmetics than 3 detailed decals that make your device have a level 20 seizure
Might as well before the mods find out, huh?
@IceCraftGaming Yeah. expected.
+1@IceCraftGaming That or implement a new fuselage paint system
+3Can't deny that there'll be those who'll paint an obvious penis on the sides of their jets but the moderators are here for a reason-
@IceCraftGaming @Mastereldo Yep. But either way, it's gonna be resource demanding since
@LuminoxBiotechCompany Still can't deny though that either way both are modeled after the F-16 since the T-50 involved Lockheed Martin in it's development
F-16 lite
make gulag next
+5@MrSilverWolf pls /summon nuke zmb vrus spredin
@Magnavox20MS233S y*
@HuskyDynamics01 @Magnavox20MS233S yr*
@Magnavox20MS233S yor*
*you're