@mikoyanster this is my entry to the Area 88 challenge. It is stated as 2.862 thrust to weight ratio but I use power multiplier to scale the engine thrust so it is actually at 2.5
0 weight only to the details part...but can I use 0.5 weight on some parts like the fuselage piece wrap around the wing? My plane is too heavy already...@mikoyanster
@TrislandianAlliance this is a 50-60s aircraft and surely need to be replace by now but the Chinese aviation industries has just started to be on the line in the recent decade so the design of the replacement for this is rather slow.
@mikoyanster Maybe I didn't express my question properly. What I mean is xml editing like 0 sec lock time, longer burning time and maneuverability, etc. Is using that kind of "super missiles" allowed??
@CoolPeach well iit is the tail section, the curve around the engine nuzzle and the tail bloom. I really cannot think of another better solution than yours.
@davygravy10 too close and the plane will pitch up like crazy(in real life engineers use fly-by-wire system to solve this but we don't have this in simple plane)
Too far away and the aircraft will be too stable and hard to control. Someyime too far away will also cause the plane to nose dive rapidly.
@Mercyaircraftcorporation the suspension is rather stuff and often bounce the vehicle up unto the air...Also it often spin out of control...just be careful when driving !
@mikoyanster this is my entry to the Area 88 challenge. It is stated as 2.862 thrust to weight ratio but I use power multiplier to scale the engine thrust so it is actually at 2.5
+1@edensk @CoolPeach Thanks for your help !
+2@edensk I will try it, thanks
+10 weight only to the details part...but can I use 0.5 weight on some parts like the fuselage piece wrap around the wing? My plane is too heavy already...@mikoyanster
@ChallengerHellcat 其實個懸掛好差, 越野果時成日整部車彈起, 又成日失控打轉(都系中文容易表達啲lol)
@ChallengerHellcat thank you !
@ChallengerHellcat 系啊，香港，千禧年人
大佬，尼部細個坐得多唔多？
+1@ChisP nope, look closely at the tail boom and try again !
@edensk Thank you very much ! I will credit you when I post this plane, you help me a lot !
+1@edensk I guess the next step is to figure out and input to activate the roll on the horizontal tailplane when VTOL is used
+1@TrislandianAlliance this is a 50-60s aircraft and surely need to be replace by now but the Chinese aviation industries has just started to be on the line in the recent decade so the design of the replacement for this is rather slow.
@edensk Thank you very much ! Stay tune for her ! Will be out by the end of the month !
+1@edensk can you expain a little bit more please? I am really a computer idiot...
@CoolPeach thank tou very much.
@mikoyanster Maybe I didn't express my question properly. What I mean is xml editing like 0 sec lock time, longer burning time and maneuverability, etc. Is using that kind of "super missiles" allowed??
Can I use a 0 drag part for building the landing gear?
Is that only stock missile can be used?
@CoolPeach well iit is the tail section, the curve around the engine nuzzle and the tail bloom. I really cannot think of another better solution than yours.
I am building a phantom too and I may need to use some of your design...but I a don't want to be a copycat...what can I do?.....
配色有點太單調了，雖說是隱形戰機，但是機身表面還是會有各種艙蓋天線之類的
@RAF1 The vertical tail is too high and the wing swept angle is also kind of too sharp...Just my personal feeling of crouse.
The shape and the length is rather out of proper ratio......especially the tail.
@CptJacobson @Baldeagle086 thank you !
@davygravy10 too close and the plane will pitch up like crazy(in real life engineers use fly-by-wire system to solve this but we don't have this in simple plane)
Too far away and the aircraft will be too stable and hard to control. Someyime too far away will also cause the plane to nose dive rapidly.
The COM and COL have to keep a proper distance. Read the in game "ground school" tutorial
+1@Strikefighter04 thank you !
@EternalDarkness thank you(Yes, my craft use your jackhammer's paintjob)
+1@yoshicraze thank you !
@frank6662333 @PacificRim @Saturnite thank you !
@Mercyaircraftcorporation the suspension is rather stuff and often bounce the vehicle up unto the air...Also it often spin out of control...just be careful when driving !
@IGNikolaev thank you !
+1Probably the the second plane after F-104 that will have pilots questioning where the heck are the wings
@mikoyanster okay
@mikoyanster Is it nesscary to be a plane that appears in the Area88 franchises?
Is that the Iran-made F-5?...
@SuperSix any comments?
@Mustang51 @SuperSix @Mercyaircraftcorporation Thank you !
@Strikefighter04 thanks for the reminder ! Corrected !
@thefalkenreich @SuperSix
+2@edensk Thank you~hope you can have a good driving experience
+2@edensk sorry for the mess, I just happens to click the upload button twice and it really upload two post. Sorry for the inconvenience : (
+1@thefalkenreich @SuperSix
Looks like a pre-alpha version of SR-71 blackbird.XD
+1Haven't see you for a long time
@XxMegamonsterxX maybe there are typo in the photo line format you are entering.
Is that the phase plasma rifle 40 watt range???
@hopotumon It is fine.
+1Nice No.3 engine self-destruct system XD !
Uped anyway
@hopotumon Marking will start tomorrow?
@DeVan Really?I have to try it!