For the clouds... in fact they are fixed on a plan which keeps the same altitude relative to you, so you can't reach them. Actually it's simple, but yeah, some clouds like the clouds 2.0 mod would be much more realistic, but the game will run slower.
The air convection is a very interesting thing
And for the altitude lighting, it would have to come at the same time as the clouds work, because it's related with the actual sky background.
What is the take off speed on a runway ? if it is higher than 116 km/h, reduce the drag (with xml editor) on the floating blocks and fuselages which are in contact with water.
After a little search here is your 737
There is also a mobile version
Anyway what is the scale of your model ? personally I have some 1:500 Herpa Wings airplanes
The shape is very good, however the performance isn't realistic (I'm talking about maneuvrability, flaps performance...); Pay attention to these points next time and your builds will be better
Tested, the shape is beautiful, the doors feature is cool, maybe the instrument panel is a bit empty, even if you tried to put some things. The rollrate is too high for a cessna, and the landing gear is too strong. But overall it's a good build, keep it up !
Man, we've known for a long time that the ISS will be retired... at least, in service for the nasa and other space agencies, because maybe it will be recovered by a private company.
"Westland gazelle" ? This is not to highlight the original builder, Sud-aviation !
Also it looks like the nose is a bit too flat... but overall it looks nice
For the clouds... in fact they are fixed on a plan which keeps the same altitude relative to you, so you can't reach them. Actually it's simple, but yeah, some clouds like the clouds 2.0 mod would be much more realistic, but the game will run slower.
+3The air convection is a very interesting thing
And for the altitude lighting, it would have to come at the same time as the clouds work, because it's related with the actual sky background.
Try to do custom wings or custom landing gears, and your builds will be better.
+1@Talisman3990 Same thing, better performance
No
+1Apple is bad at transferring data to another iPhone... not like android or windows where you can do whatever you want with files...
If it's the fact that the car turns by itself, I don't know
But your car is very pleasant to drive
WWII: P-40, P-51
Modern: Mirage 2000, Mirage F1, Boeing 757
A rotator between several wings sections... But it's not very realistic.
What is the take off speed on a runway ? if it is higher than 116 km/h, reduce the drag (with xml editor) on the floating blocks and fuselages which are in contact with water.
After a little search here is your 737
There is also a mobile version
Anyway what is the scale of your model ? personally I have some 1:500 Herpa Wings airplanes
Yes. When I find a difficulty, I stop for several weeks or months... and it's hard to find the motivation.
+1I like this type of videos
+2Great improvements !
The shape is very good, however the performance isn't realistic (I'm talking about maneuvrability, flaps performance...); Pay attention to these points next time and your builds will be better
Your builds designs are original, but unfortunately the success doesn't seem to be there...
+1100th
+4Awesome.
+1@X99STRIKER And it's far from the end x)
Nice build, but the front gear steering can't go to 90°... like this it's difficult to turn on ground. Same thing on your CFM A320.
+1@AndiTontrando You're welcome
+1Tested, the shape is beautiful, the doors feature is cool, maybe the instrument panel is a bit empty, even if you tried to put some things. The rollrate is too high for a cessna, and the landing gear is too strong. But overall it's a good build, keep it up !
+2Man, we've known for a long time that the ISS will be retired... at least, in service for the nasa and other space agencies, because maybe it will be recovered by a private company.
+1@Thorne Lol thank you
+3The R3 ! The famous Ferrari !
My Fenwick forklift, of which I haven't seen many better builds than this on the website...
+3Looks nice, but it looks like there is something wrong with the smoothing...
Albatros X Avanti
+1@KDnotSpy I literally didn't notice ! lol
But what i mean is that you can make a better Tu-160 staying at 160 parts max.
Finally a Piaggio Avanti... it looks very nice !
Very nice ! love it !
I think you can do better with 160 parts
+1"Westland gazelle" ? This is not to highlight the original builder, Sud-aviation !
+1Also it looks like the nose is a bit too flat... but overall it looks nice
Wow, so cool ! We are waiting for a new car engine sounds now
I don't see the stupid AI cars
Beautiful. I see a lot of these near my house.
Looks good, I prefer the livery of the last pictures
Too big structure lines...
@DieLoaf RV-14 lol
What is this "650-pounds flares" ? Either way, it's fictional.
+2What can I say ? looks perfect
Beautiful ! I love seeing these small GE planes on the website :)
Nice build !
+1Very nice, I had flown in an airplane which was a Cessna L-19, quite similar, it's a cool airplane.
Good but why it's, again, a mod...
T
Nice build, you make me want to build a private jet like this !
Nice build, the cargo loader is really a good Idea !
Yeah, it's hard to make fly designs like this
Looks great
@BagelPlane Spektrum remains a good brand
+1My plane ! :D
Thank you Jundroo