@Tully2001 Good question. Personally, I don't think it would matter too much if it was unlisted because unlisted planes tend to be for personal use and don't have the intention of being upvoted by others. I'll double check with the other mods though.
@EternalDarkness I have no problems talking to you. However, I tend to try not to dwell on the past. I prefer to let bygones be bygones as to do otherwise would be a waste of time. All you need to remember are mistakes. Everything else you can forget.
.
To explain further, I have largely forgotten about everything you have said and what happened between us. What I have learned is better self control. If memory portrays correctly, what we did was have a dispute of who could metaphorically slap the other the hardest. In essence, we're both losers in that sense. There was nothing to gain, but still we continued to fight for what was essentially an ego boost. That's not a battle of wit, but rather a battle of pettiness. There is no winner there. We were both losers.
.
In the process I have learned the hallmarks of such disputes and have learned how to refrain from engaging in them.
.
Anyway, this is an apology thread, so it seems rather fitting to do finish with one. I'm sorry for wasting your time and for arguably bringing out the worst in both you and I.
@SteadfastContracting I figured you might be busy. My next upload might be an airliner (not our one). It's been in my upload queue for a while now. That said, I might have a few other planes that I could probably upload to postpone it.
@JacobHardy64 I think the developers want to keep this place a clean site. Some people don't like swearing for various reasons like religion, etc, so it makes the site a more friendly for them.
.
As for the 13+ statement. I'm pretty sure they have to keep it like that by law.
@SigmaTwelve Bans SigmaTwelve for not making SP your favourite online community
.
In all seriousness though, thank you very much for your kind words! I can't speak for the other mods or devs, but, personally, it's always good to get feedback telling us we're doing our job right.
Regarding upvotes and spotlights. I have to be honest, they aren't essential to me. I'd rather you just upvotes stuff that I made that you considered good, rather than upvote and spotlight just because we're both making ES series aircraft.
.
I'll check out your upload later on today hopefully. I also have a kit thing planned with most of the trademark stuff in almost ready for uploading. But, currently I'm not feeling 100% so I'm going to try get a bit of rest and keep myself from looking at screens.
@kukimuki1234 Sorry, it was more the name and age. I guess I got a bit carried away and deleted the location too. But yeah, I see no problem with putting your country of origin down.
@FennVectorCWA yeah, I'd be lying if I said it was a smooth ride. Actually managed to get a cult of haters at one point. Looks like things have calmed down since I've been away though.
Also, SISC-3 fuselage is kind of done... there's a catch though. Apparently, you need the Beta version in order to download it, even though there's no beta parts in it XD
@Fygaroh Had to remove your comment on the grounds it contained language that is... not necessarily bad, but inappropriate for the website. Namely a word regarding a man's unmentionables. Although I'm willing to go out on a limb and say what you did was a typo?
@kukimuki1234 I edited your bio as it contained too much personal information. Try not to disclose sensitive information about yourself publicly as people can use it against you.
@DimaKosheleFF sorry for the late reply. I was away for a while. There's a few tutorials on the internet on how to make them. I might do one myself at some point, but not for at least a month or two as I'm fairly busy at the moment.
@Delphinus it's been so long I can't remember XD I think a lot of the vehicles (AA tanks and destroyers) were removed though and I think I deleted one of the islands too. I'm actually making a new map at the moment, so if I make a lite version, I'll be sure to be more specific in the description as to what the differences are.
@SteadfastContracting Something that's about 250ft then. Wide body airliners are the craze now, so maybe we could take that to the extreme and make something with a very wide fuselage.
@SteadfastContracting I have an airliner in my inventory at the moment which is close to being finished, so I've been trying my hand at them too. What did you have in mind? Supersonic airliner? double decker?
@CaesiciusPlanes I'll get round to it at some point. Not sure when though. Might set a couple ground rules for basic design too... Mainly paint schemes and maybe flight characteristics or something.
@RMark1 It's an F-111 Aardvark. The F-111 as far as I'm aware is the only military aircraft with dump and burn, which this photo shows very clearly. The TU-22 is more boxy looking too and has very pronounced intakes as part of the wing root. The F-111 has those distinctive black triangular marks on the wing root as well and the intakes are under the wing root, rather than physically part of it. Also the TU-22 doesn't have a black radome, while the F-111's do by default.
.
Type in F-111 dump and burn on Google. You'll get some nice looking pictures. I had one as a desktop wallpaper once!
@The1ultimate1builder That comment wasn't directed at you, but sorry for any unintentional offence caused. I was pointing out that the person that claims you copied them didn't even exist at the time when you uploaded this.
@CaesiciusPlanes As for making planes on behalf of Squirrel industries. Like I say, I've got mixed views. I don't like taking credit for other people's hard work, that said it's kind of reminiscent of the real world. If it's something you want to do, then I could probably set up a small unlisted package of modded parts I tend to use on my builds like the guns, engines, etc.
@CaesiciusPlanes depends what you mean by recruit. As in make planes on behalf of the company or do collaborations?
.
Squirrel industries has a very small history of collaborating and helping other builders, but so far haven't got anyone making aircraft on behalf of us as I have mixed views on it. That and nobody has ever asked before XD
@Tully2001 Good question. Personally, I don't think it would matter too much if it was unlisted because unlisted planes tend to be for personal use and don't have the intention of being upvoted by others. I'll double check with the other mods though.
It appears you've directly copied the predecessor and only added 3 parts. Could you explain any significant difference between the two aircraft?
@EternalDarkness Sure. Better than whatever it was before XD
@EternalDarkness I have no problems talking to you. However, I tend to try not to dwell on the past. I prefer to let bygones be bygones as to do otherwise would be a waste of time. All you need to remember are mistakes. Everything else you can forget.
.
To explain further, I have largely forgotten about everything you have said and what happened between us. What I have learned is better self control. If memory portrays correctly, what we did was have a dispute of who could metaphorically slap the other the hardest. In essence, we're both losers in that sense. There was nothing to gain, but still we continued to fight for what was essentially an ego boost. That's not a battle of wit, but rather a battle of pettiness. There is no winner there. We were both losers.
.
In the process I have learned the hallmarks of such disputes and have learned how to refrain from engaging in them.
.
Anyway, this is an apology thread, so it seems rather fitting to do finish with one. I'm sorry for wasting your time and for arguably bringing out the worst in both you and I.
@PhilipTarpley Why does Andrew have legs for arms? and why are they coming out his stomach? XD
@saturn28 it's on the main menu under something like sandbox maps. It's a separate map to the actual default one.
approved it.
@saturn28 what do you mean?
@SethGordon No hate speech please.
@MEGANOOB Less of the language please. Kids use this site.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
@SteadfastContracting I figured you might be busy. My next upload might be an airliner (not our one). It's been in my upload queue for a while now. That said, I might have a few other planes that I could probably upload to postpone it.
@JacobHardy64 I think the developers want to keep this place a clean site. Some people don't like swearing for various reasons like religion, etc, so it makes the site a more friendly for them.
.
As for the 13+ statement. I'm pretty sure they have to keep it like that by law.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
@CaesiciusPlanes it's quite fitting for an aircraft that essentially rains hell XD
@SigmaTwelve Bans SigmaTwelve for not making SP your favourite online community
.
In all seriousness though, thank you very much for your kind words! I can't speak for the other mods or devs, but, personally, it's always good to get feedback telling us we're doing our job right.
@CaesiciusPlanes Thank you!
Regarding upvotes and spotlights. I have to be honest, they aren't essential to me. I'd rather you just upvotes stuff that I made that you considered good, rather than upvote and spotlight just because we're both making ES series aircraft.
.
I'll check out your upload later on today hopefully. I also have a kit thing planned with most of the trademark stuff in almost ready for uploading. But, currently I'm not feeling 100% so I'm going to try get a bit of rest and keep myself from looking at screens.
@Shrekbopcity Please refrain from calling people names on the site.
.
@Johndfg Try not to agitate users.
@kukimuki1234 Sorry, it was more the name and age. I guess I got a bit carried away and deleted the location too. But yeah, I see no problem with putting your country of origin down.
@FennVectorCWA yeah, I'd be lying if I said it was a smooth ride. Actually managed to get a cult of haters at one point. Looks like things have calmed down since I've been away though.
Also, SISC-3 fuselage is kind of done... there's a catch though. Apparently, you need the Beta version in order to download it, even though there's no beta parts in it XD
@SteadfastContracting I haven't a clue where he his.
@FennVectorCWA Thank you! It's always nice to have people tell us we're doing our job right!
@Fygaroh Had to remove your comment on the grounds it contained language that is... not necessarily bad, but inappropriate for the website. Namely a word regarding a man's unmentionables. Although I'm willing to go out on a limb and say what you did was a typo?
@kukimuki1234 I edited your bio as it contained too much personal information. Try not to disclose sensitive information about yourself publicly as people can use it against you.
@Delphinus No problem!
I knew a mechanic by the name of Fulcrum. He specialised in MIG welding
When you're friends with an F-111, the General Dynamics tend to be quite good.
@DimaKosheleFF sorry for the late reply. I was away for a while. There's a few tutorials on the internet on how to make them. I might do one myself at some point, but not for at least a month or two as I'm fairly busy at the moment.
@Delphinus it's been so long I can't remember XD I think a lot of the vehicles (AA tanks and destroyers) were removed though and I think I deleted one of the islands too. I'm actually making a new map at the moment, so if I make a lite version, I'll be sure to be more specific in the description as to what the differences are.
@majorpain0600 Please refrain from saying things like that. If not, further action will be taken.
@RMark1 thank you
@SteadfastContracting I'll set up a basic fuslage later on today at some point, and upload it to see what you think.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
@SteadfastContracting Something that's about 250ft then. Wide body airliners are the craze now, so maybe we could take that to the extreme and make something with a very wide fuselage.
@SteadfastContracting I have an airliner in my inventory at the moment which is close to being finished, so I've been trying my hand at them too. What did you have in mind? Supersonic airliner? double decker?
@CaesiciusPlanes I'll get round to it at some point. Not sure when though. Might set a couple ground rules for basic design too... Mainly paint schemes and maybe flight characteristics or something.
@RMark1 It's an F-111 Aardvark. The F-111 as far as I'm aware is the only military aircraft with dump and burn, which this photo shows very clearly. The TU-22 is more boxy looking too and has very pronounced intakes as part of the wing root. The F-111 has those distinctive black triangular marks on the wing root as well and the intakes are under the wing root, rather than physically part of it. Also the TU-22 doesn't have a black radome, while the F-111's do by default.
.
Type in F-111 dump and burn on Google. You'll get some nice looking pictures. I had one as a desktop wallpaper once!
@SteadfastContracting yeah! you wanting to do another collaboration at some point?
@MediocrePlanes Karma sucks KarmaSucksAndrew XD
@The1ultimate1builder That comment wasn't directed at you, but sorry for any unintentional offence caused. I was pointing out that the person that claims you copied them didn't even exist at the time when you uploaded this.
@JameThyst lol. Did think about making a box ship.
@Windymango No problem!
@CaesiciusPlanes As for making planes on behalf of Squirrel industries. Like I say, I've got mixed views. I don't like taking credit for other people's hard work, that said it's kind of reminiscent of the real world. If it's something you want to do, then I could probably set up a small unlisted package of modded parts I tend to use on my builds like the guns, engines, etc.
@CaesiciusPlanes You get the award for realising the fact the notification number matches the aircraft. I thought nobody would get the reference XD
@nfsplatinum Glad you got a laugh out of it!
@CaesiciusPlanes depends what you mean by recruit. As in make planes on behalf of the company or do collaborations?
.
Squirrel industries has a very small history of collaborating and helping other builders, but so far haven't got anyone making aircraft on behalf of us as I have mixed views on it. That and nobody has ever asked before XD
@Tully2001 It's good to be back XD
@CaesiciusPlanes I noticed that change just before. And what do you mean?
@SteadfastContracting Holiday. Thought I'd mentioned I'd be away in this post, but I haven't... oops XD
@jw1523 Thank you!