Definitely Antonwings. Posts part efficient, well above par replicas and doesn't get wrapped up in drama.
Catbaron and MrSilverwolf. Both of theses two put effort into making there builds detailed, and and flight accurate. They also take advantage of funkytrees to ensure flight sim (or better) realism with things like engine startup and propeller management.
They test spy planes at Edwards. Groom Lake is where our foreign aircraft evaluation and adversary squadrons are based. We have a squadron that uses mig 29s and su-30s that flies down to the Nelis test range for Red Flag.
Infact all the good stuff is nowhere near area 51.
Seriously? A joke challenge and you don't want white Rankers to join? I take offense to this because when I first started, joining challenges are how I got atarted.started.
We're all entitled to our opinion, however you should be ashamed of yours.
I feel like February is an active year for people to go on vacation, and do other things with family or make money / life moves. I would not be surprised if this is just due to life happening we are all after all, human.
@Mousewithamachinegun122 He wasn't the guy running the show. It was a moderator on that discord, who has been Ostriched by the community since then. In fact I believe he was also banned as well, after his antics on that discord, but the damage has been done. by the way, if it helps, it was Simpleplanes Builders Chat.
As far as we know, no. Andrew has only supposedly mentioned this on one discord, only after 75% of its members were permabanned for no reason. An as far as I am concerned, anything that happens on that discord should be considered false until proven true.
@PrussianAirlines So it's inspired by "Miss Ashley II", which was a P-51 fuselage mated to a Learjet 23 flight surfaces, but retained the P-51s vertical tail, albeit coming off an H model. This caused the tail to fail at pylon 1 of the reno race course in 1997, causing the plane to break apart. I hypothesize that had someone used an F-86s wings and tail including the vertical stab, it'd make a fast and sturdy race plane.
Not to be THAT GUY, but what you're doing here is not only calling out another player, circumventing the moderator system, but also a form of harassment in and of itself. although I am not a moderator I HIGHLY recommend removing this post.
Unless this is strictly for satirical purposes. If that is the case LOLS
@LunarEclipseSP @Mousewithamachinegun123 @Majakalona it's based on Philip Tarpley's P-51 which wasn't meant too, but ended up looking alot like the P-51XR. I used Designer suit so it is exactly as it should be sized. With that being said, why did you guys upvote this? It's a piece of Garbage! Lol
They worked on this game for ten years! Could it use a few more features and tweaks? Absolutely. But is it time to bury the hatchet and move on? Most definitely!
I'm working un updating the stock planes from the first versions of Simpleplanes to be usefulin VR. The last one will infact be a bomber. Then I'll either do dev builds that didn't make it as stock planes, or move on to the second gen stock planes
Thier is a version of the Tutorialplane that will spawn, that like any other AI plane that's hidden in the design menu. This particular plane spawns aggressive 90% of the time, and is unarmed. So it will try to ram you.
Means it was tested in SPVR and has good qualities. Basically the cockpit is complete and you can move all the controls and fly the plane comfortably without having to move around too much.
There used to be 2 or 3 curators but they gave curator privileges to everyone. You can even curate your own builds, although I disagree with doing so.
@PPLLAANNEE @HuskyDynamics01 ok those are good points. Another issue I just thought of is that my current build, which is supposed to be armed with four AN/m3 cannons, I can't get the cannons to not collide with its own fuselages, dispite collision being turned off.
The Bell X-5 was litterally an American built copy of this plane. Bell was contracted by NACA to build it straight from the plans we confiscated during project paper clip, for research into our jet program, which became the F-86. the variable sweep wings were added later.
This is one way to do it
Cool
Definitely Antonwings. Posts part efficient, well above par replicas and doesn't get wrapped up in drama.
+6Catbaron and MrSilverwolf. Both of theses two put effort into making there builds detailed, and and flight accurate. They also take advantage of funkytrees to ensure flight sim (or better) realism with things like engine startup and propeller management.
@Chubster honestly leave it alone. Karts Re super easy to oversteer and it could get frustrating.
Part efficient, 1:1 scale and looks good! and, drives great although a bit to easy
why didn't you modernize the build? surely with the parts at your disposal, you can add new gauges and windows!
They test spy planes at Edwards. Groom Lake is where our foreign aircraft evaluation and adversary squadrons are based. We have a squadron that uses mig 29s and su-30s that flies down to the Nelis test range for Red Flag.
Infact all the good stuff is nowhere near area 51.
I don't normally upvote successors but this is different. If i may suggest, utilize the label part to complete the livery.
are you talking about the Simplelandia war of 2019? that was a kinda world role play that failed because it got out of hand due to a few reasons.
+1@RepublicOfCursedPlanes find something better to do with your time.
+6Seriously? A joke challenge and you don't want white Rankers to join? I take offense to this because when I first started, joining challenges are how I got atarted.started.
We're all entitled to our opinion, however you should be ashamed of yours.
+9@LunarEclipseSP I don't have Fandom account but I do have every stock aircraft from 1.0 to current as well as who made it and what it was based on.
+1I feel like February is an active year for people to go on vacation, and do other things with family or make money / life moves. I would not be surprised if this is just due to life happening we are all after all, human.
That's not how it works
Sounds like it needs an alignment
@Mousewithamachinegun122 He wasn't the guy running the show. It was a moderator on that discord, who has been Ostriched by the community since then. In fact I believe he was also banned as well, after his antics on that discord, but the damage has been done. by the way, if it helps, it was Simpleplanes Builders Chat.
+1As far as we know, no. Andrew has only supposedly mentioned this on one discord, only after 75% of its members were permabanned for no reason. An as far as I am concerned, anything that happens on that discord should be considered false until proven true.
+1Print one of your Simpleplanes builds
How is this a Focker Dr.1?
@PrussianAirlines So it's inspired by "Miss Ashley II", which was a P-51 fuselage mated to a Learjet 23 flight surfaces, but retained the P-51s vertical tail, albeit coming off an H model. This caused the tail to fail at pylon 1 of the reno race course in 1997, causing the plane to break apart. I hypothesize that had someone used an F-86s wings and tail including the vertical stab, it'd make a fast and sturdy race plane.
"No, we do not serve Mac and cheese! That's Mandarin Oranges!"
Kachow
Someone's not happy about dynamic pricing
+3This seriously needs to be pinned
@DatTrainGuy19 @AtlasAir747MyBeloved It only looks small. it's actually scale.
Not to be THAT GUY, but what you're doing here is not only calling out another player, circumventing the moderator system, but also a form of harassment in and of itself. although I am not a moderator I HIGHLY recommend removing this post.
Unless this is strictly for satirical purposes. If that is the case LOLS
+3@Kerbango you're the man!!!
Did you ever happen to make a Jundroo or Simpleplanes logo label?
I don't know but I managed to do it.
+1I used to be able to eat a whole little ceaser's medium 3 meat pizza
+3@LunarEclipseSP @Mousewithamachinegun123 @Majakalona it's based on Philip Tarpley's P-51 which wasn't meant too, but ended up looking alot like the P-51XR. I used Designer suit so it is exactly as it should be sized. With that being said, why did you guys upvote this? It's a piece of Garbage! Lol
As always keep an eye out for the updated version
+1RIP
Not bad for a mobile build
No
They worked on this game for ten years! Could it use a few more features and tweaks? Absolutely. But is it time to bury the hatchet and move on? Most definitely!
+2What the hell?
+2You're making a T-rex or Velociraptor, right?
@Mousewithamachinegun123 sounds good and I might join
+1I'm working un updating the stock planes from the first versions of Simpleplanes to be usefulin VR. The last one will infact be a bomber. Then I'll either do dev builds that didn't make it as stock planes, or move on to the second gen stock planes
Thier is a version of the Tutorialplane that will spawn, that like any other AI plane that's hidden in the design menu. This particular plane spawns aggressive 90% of the time, and is unarmed. So it will try to ram you.
Means it was tested in SPVR and has good qualities. Basically the cockpit is complete and you can move all the controls and fly the plane comfortably without having to move around too much.
+3There used to be 2 or 3 curators but they gave curator privileges to everyone. You can even curate your own builds, although I disagree with doing so.
@PPLLAANNEE @HuskyDynamics01 ok those are good points. Another issue I just thought of is that my current build, which is supposed to be armed with four AN/m3 cannons, I can't get the cannons to not collide with its own fuselages, dispite collision being turned off.
@SnoWFLakE0s don't get me wrong I plan on playing with this, I just don't see where paneling is useful over slicing.
@kasachstanball probably not because noone knows what a zeta plane is.
We haven't needed Fuselage paneling for over a year now...
Now adays low part count is between 100 and 200 parts and anything under 100 is just low effort
Juno is still missing Hollow fuselages, glass fuselages, Hollow-glass fuselages, and nose cones related to all three, and gas motors.
+1The Bell X-5 was litterally an American built copy of this plane. Bell was contracted by NACA to build it straight from the plans we confiscated during project paper clip, for research into our jet program, which became the F-86. the variable sweep wings were added later.
+1I saw nothing
Inland North west. I upload at around 6:00 AM or 1:00 pm