I don't understand why either man, I take criticism from my stuff all the time, and I do care what people say, it helps me fix things. So I don't get why people don't want that. If you don't take criticism, then you'll never get better.
.
Also, as @Brields95 said, try to not to say too much for your sake, so you don't get raked over the coals by others.
Well, the reverse card is specially for the SimpleLandian First Attack Squadron of Rattlers @jimmyje
+1Thanks a lot! @jimmyje
+1Epic, but can I submit mine and tag you, I've already almost finished it.
+1Thanks man! @Chancey21
+1Doc Hudson!
+1Ya like jazz?
+1Ah yes
+1Lol @DeGebra
+1Alright, it'll be done shortly @thefalkenreich
+1Lol @Hypixel @Alta2809
Tags
+1@Cassio11
@Sbevensplanes
@BlackhattAircraft
Nice!
+1This is awesome!
+1As the title says, its basic math @Gameboi14
+1Thanks! @nameisalreadytaken
+1Noice @GeneralPatrick2
+1Thanks! Good luck! @DickBrazen
+1Very nice! But why do you have a tail rotor when you have two main rotors?
+1The plane has not been released yet. @Cassio11
+1Idk yet, I've never actually tried it. I'm guessing it will show the missile in both Air to Air and Air to Ground. @GeneralPatrick2
+1For naming, use the XML property name.
+1For the role of the missile, use the XML property function, then have it as multirole
How art thou? @GeneralPatrick2
+1Hello there
+1Lol your welcome! I'll go ahead and spotlight too! @Windworn
+1Awesome!
+1Don't beat yourself up, some have done far worse things (my Iranian Attack Jet) @Sm10684
+1Yeah you should!
+1Your welcome! @F4Mustang
+1Awesome!
+1Wow I looked up to him. I always remembered trying to pass him in points. But I guess he's gone now.
+1Awesome!
+1Wow, reminds me of the worms
+1Indeed @BlackhattAircraft
+1Very epic, t
+1Awesome!
+1I don't understand why either man, I take criticism from my stuff all the time, and I do care what people say, it helps me fix things. So I don't get why people don't want that. If you don't take criticism, then you'll never get better.
+1.
Also, as @Brields95 said, try to not to say too much for your sake, so you don't get raked over the coals by others.
Np! @Lorileni
+1Very nice!
+1T
+1Yep! I need to give you a lot of credit sometime lol @ChallengerHellcat
+1Basically @Sinacraft
Wilkommen Komrade!
+1Very nice work!
+1The pilot could choose to fire each one independently or in sync through a selector switch in the cockpit. @FairFireFight
+1I could possibly do that... @AircraftoftheRedStar
+1Well, it's the exact same as the one I already posted, it just has the cannon parts. @AircraftoftheRedStar
+1Your welcome! @hRmm
+1No problem @Evenstsrike333
+1Yes definitely @Mustang51
+1Hero of the Soviet Union
+1Very nice!
+1True, that can be a future project @TheFantasticTyphoon
+1