@YarisHatchback I may have overdone it a bit. All in the name of being eye-catching.
@JBPAviation You can't see it, but it's reinforced.
@JBPAviation It's hard plastic.
Soviet?
Language.
@crazyplaness There have also been no failed manned moon missions in 50 years. Must be safe.
Very simple. Appealing.
@Graingy Yes. That reminds me, @GuyWhoBuildStuff
Then it clearly happened again.
@hpgbproductions I don't follow. I am going to assume you're an animator because treating it as an animation is meaningless when I'm not one.
@Graingy Boy, you sure took your time to catch on.
You didn't need to tag me twice.
@hpgbproductions I don't follow?
@Graingy This is much more affordable.
... For a brief moment I thought I was looking at a toilet with guns sticking out of it.
This would be useful information, yes.
This is the opposite of ergonomic.
I've dealt with enough weird eldritch stuff in my time. I'll pass.
Add in a sea monster for a good sea tale.
@GuyWhoBuildStuff Try Gravatar.
@Graingy Yes, keeping cost low was a priority. It's a highly affordable aircraft, and should be competitive in the civilian sector as well.
@JSTQ I already achieved it with round()
@JSTQ I had tried interchanging GearDown and LandingGear. I don't believe the result was any different.
Nice picture.
@JSTQ None of what you said made any sense whatsoever. Please rephrase.
Content is no longer available you idiot. Use a proper image hosting site, not Discord.
@griges The pain of being Silver.
Aight, figured it out. The gear, not why the original method didn't work.
round() appears to hold a solution, though I'm still not sure why my original solution did not function as expected.
Altered the title and text to reflect my current issue.
I cannot determine conclusively whether or not Input accepts true/false
New problem, differing timing on retracting and extending.
The secret ingredient is lying
GLF-80
Wow.
This post was made on 19/3/25, for clarity.
@ComradeSandman Good point...
@Graingy ?
20 upvotes. Nice.
@Graingy Of course you do. @Boeing727200F I only just got out of a forest so I have been rather sour... okay, fine, I've been for a while, but that aside.
@SimpleStudent Nice rabbit
@ComradeSandman Twice in a row? Maybe hell has frozen over...
@TheMouse It's got to be pretty bad for me and Grain to agree on something.
And no, we're not friends.
@Graingy Indeed.
Good advice.
@Graingy oooh look I joined your little parade.
I'm going with the first for the time being.
@Graingy Can't, in the woods.
@Rob119 I am very tired and not sure what I'm looking at.
@YarisHatchback I may have overdone it a bit.
All in the name of being eye-catching.
@JBPAviation You can't see it, but it's reinforced.
+1@JBPAviation It's hard plastic.
Soviet?
Language.
+2@crazyplaness There have also been no failed manned moon missions in 50 years. Must be safe.
Very simple. Appealing.
@Graingy Yes.
That reminds me, @GuyWhoBuildStuff
Then it clearly happened again.
@hpgbproductions I don't follow.
I am going to assume you're an animator because treating it as an animation is meaningless when I'm not one.
@Graingy Boy, you sure took your time to catch on.
You didn't need to tag me twice.
@hpgbproductions I don't follow?
@Graingy This is much more affordable.
... For a brief moment I thought I was looking at a toilet with guns sticking out of it.
+2This would be useful information, yes.
This is the opposite of ergonomic.
I've dealt with enough weird eldritch stuff in my time. I'll pass.
+3Add in a sea monster for a good sea tale.
+1@GuyWhoBuildStuff Try Gravatar.
@Graingy Yes, keeping cost low was a priority. It's a highly affordable aircraft, and should be competitive in the civilian sector as well.
@JSTQ I already achieved it with round()
+1@JSTQ I had tried interchanging GearDown and LandingGear. I don't believe the result was any different.
Nice picture.
@JSTQ None of what you said made any sense whatsoever.
Please rephrase.
Content is no longer available you idiot.
Use a proper image hosting site, not Discord.
@griges The pain of being Silver.
+2Aight, figured it out.
+2The gear, not why the original method didn't work.
round() appears to hold a solution, though I'm still not sure why my original solution did not function as expected.
Altered the title and text to reflect my current issue.
I cannot determine conclusively whether or not Input accepts true/false
New problem, differing timing on retracting and extending.
The secret ingredient is lying
GLF-80
Wow.
+1This post was made on 19/3/25, for clarity.
@ComradeSandman Good point...
@Graingy ?
20 upvotes. Nice.
@Graingy Of course you do.
@Boeing727200F I only just got out of a forest so I have been rather sour... okay, fine, I've been for a while, but that aside.
@SimpleStudent Nice rabbit
@ComradeSandman Twice in a row? Maybe hell has frozen over...
@TheMouse It's got to be pretty bad for me and Grain to agree on something.
+1And no, we're not friends.
@Graingy Indeed.
Good advice.
@Graingy oooh look I joined your little parade.
I'm going with the first for the time being.
+1@Graingy Can't, in the woods.
@Rob119 I am very tired and not sure what I'm looking at.
+1