53.2k Tang0five Comments

  • SR71 4.3 years ago

    Clues in the name right? :) @ElectricVehicle

    +1
  • Aerospatiale-BAC Concorde Singapore Airlines 4.3 years ago

    Beautiful, drop dead gorgeous in fact - just like the real bird. I’m nit going to be able to try it on this heap until I get my pc sorted alas. Is all that crazy broccoli make for optimal cruising alt (60,000ft if I remember rightly?)

    +1
  • USS Arizona Teaser - A walk in the past 4.3 years ago

    Most informative, I doff my cap to you sir! @BMilan

    +1
  • USS Arizona Teaser - A walk in the past 4.3 years ago

    Looks awesome! What were the red patches on the turret roofs for?

    +1
  • CRS Republic 4.3 years ago

    Looks like a predreadnought bravo!

    +1
  • Boeing E-3 Sentry 4.3 years ago

    Cracking job! I prefer not to fiddle with cockpits so I approve this!

    +1
  • Il-114 4.3 years ago

    I’ve no doubt you positioned them correctly, I think the hinges needs to be inverted/not inverted as they don’t move to cover the void space the landing gear retracts into. @Araknis

    +1
  • Il-114 4.4 years ago

    Pretty good, gear doors close the wrong way though, other than that its a great low part build!

    +1
  • Boeing 757-300 RB211 Icelandair 4.4 years ago

    Awesome job with the livery and build in general. How do you get a clean two tone line all the way around the fuselage like that? God I’ve tried but I always end up with the colours glitching through.

    +1
  • RMS Titanic 4.4 years ago

    Why are people changing their names I don’t know who you are anymore! Lovely looking build by the way, pretty damn epic.

    +1
  • Handley Page Victor B.Mk.2 4.4 years ago

    You wouldn’t be treading on my toes, if by some random chance I was working on an argosy I’d still tell you to crack on and look forward to seeing it! @theeunknown

    +1
  • IJN Kongo 4.4 years ago

    beautiful build!

    +1
  • Handley Page Victor B.Mk.2 4.4 years ago

    case and point i spelled it wrong just there as well! @theeunknown

    +1
  • Handley Page Victor B.Mk.2 4.4 years ago

    @theeunknown were you not tylerdevenuexmusic? This name changing thing was a bad idea, ive no idea who people are now :)

    +1
  • Handley Page Victor B.Mk.2 4.4 years ago

    @theeunknown oh yes, hard to view this as a 50s bomber!

    +1
  • NAA AT-6 Texan 4.4 years ago

    No bother, neat build. Stall point really low and it turns a little too tight but I like your build! @WarHawk95

    +1
  • THE FLYING SCOTSMAN 4.4 years ago

    Unique build, good for you! I’ve tried pistons before and understand why you didn’t, it’s a bloody headache! @MASTERMEMES

    +1
  • ell 3 4.4 years ago

    Yay pre dreadnought! Waterline version?

    +1
  • Brewster Buffalo 4.4 years ago

    Thanks mate! There’s not many on this site I’ll give you that! @LuftwaffeAce262

    +1
  • Shenyang J-15 (Also probably my last submission ): ) 4.4 years ago

    That’s quite a story. I think you will build again, you’ll get a summer break etc, and you’ll see something that will grab your attention and you’ll think “that would look good on SP” and before you know it there will be a “I’m back” post and will all sigh and think - you never left. No one leaves SP for good! :)
    All the best!

    +1
  • USS Texas (BB-35) 4.4 years ago

    Well you didn’t choose the lattice mast version so I’m going to have to take back my support.....
    I joke. Beautiful build, magnificent specimen. Everything’s bigger and better in Texas!

    +1
  • HaMS3.1 4.4 years ago

    This is magnificent! I’d use a lighter shade of grey as it’s hard to make out detail, great looking build though!

    +1
  • RJ-Grumman Meerkat 4.4 years ago

    Saves you money on your plane insurance....

    Sorry, I couldn’t help myself. I’ll stand myself in the naughty corner.

    +1
  • Ayrton Senna Lotus 99T 1987 4.4 years ago

    There’s a lot of emotion when the word ‘Imola’ pops up for that season. “If you don’t take an opportunity in a race, well you’re no longer a racing driver” very true. I like how he raised the profile of Brazil and was quite charitable alongside his personal jet etc. :) @theeunknown

    +1
  • Ayrton Senna Lotus 99T 1987 4.4 years ago

    It’s a little rustic but I agree, he was a hero! I take it you’ve watched ‘Senna’? @theeunknown

    +1
  • USS Texas Teaser - Walkaround 4.4 years ago

    Magnificent looking beast and the Texas is a beast! Was fortunate enough to visit her when I was a kid, great stuff!

    +1
  • Boeing 767-300 American Airlines Old livery 4.4 years ago

    I love watching old(er) movies and seeing this livery. Good job!

    +1
  • Airfix Challenge RJ Firefly 1.5 4.4 years ago

    Very neat design, reminds me of the chipmunk!

    +1
  • **CLOSED** Airfix Challenge **CLOSED** 4.4 years ago

    Definitely the latter, real life can be paused can’t it....:) @RamboJutter

    +1
  • Brewster Buffalo 4.4 years ago

    Thanks for spotlighting this barrel! @Sgtk and @Diloph

    +1
  • Brewster Buffalo 4.4 years ago

    Thanks for the spot @EpicPigster1 most kind! I agree, as far as general aviation went they had no vicious characteristics and would have/did make good trainers. Powerplants were always a big issue after they chose to fit the more reliable but less performing wright cyclone engines more suited to transport/bombers. A lot of these engines were reconditioned in cottage industry workshops that led to noticeable difference in performance from one engine to another - noticed in sqn climbs etc. Really quite a fascinating kite. Theres a lot of info out there and pilot diaries etc I just got comp[letely absorbed and was in danger of putting together a thesis - but no one reads the description lets face it!

    +1
  • Brewster Buffalo 4.4 years ago

    @F4f879 thankS mate!

    +1
  • HMS iron duke 4.4 years ago

    Utterly magnificent. Must have been living in a cave when this was published!

    +1
  • He 177 Greif 4.5 years ago

    Fritz works but is hard to control. I would scale the wings down to increase lift and improve handling and maybe throw in a gyro to make it more stable? Overall it’s a cool feature well done!

    +1
  • He 177 Greif 4.5 years ago

    I really like this bomber type and I’m glad someone has built it!

    +1
  • Gloster IVB 4.5 years ago

    Thanks for your recent interest! @Suubk27

    +1
  • McDonnell Douglas DC-8 51 Lufthansa livery 4.5 years ago

    I do like seeing retro livery’s, good job!

    +1
  • Airbus A380-800 Thai Airways 4.5 years ago

    Cracking job, love the screenshots!

    +1
  • F-86 Sabre Republic of China (With Ejection Seat) 4.5 years ago

    Love the detail and under 500 parts too!

    +1
  • Nakajima A6M2-N Rufe 4.5 years ago

    Food for thought - how the hell do my builds work on pc - that’s a scary thought if there’s such discrepancies with this! @QingyuZhou

    +1
  • DH-115 Vampire (AURI) 4.5 years ago

    Yeah I lived there for a couple of years in the late 90’s. As a kid I loved it! @ElectricVehicle

    +1
  • DH-115 Vampire (AURI) 4.5 years ago

    Very cool build, used to live on Borneo - love Indonesia!

    +1
  • BTL-A4 Y-wing 4.5 years ago

    got to be my favourite star wars bird!

    +1
  • Nakajima A6M2-N Rufe 4.5 years ago

    Yeah your right, works fine on pc. High settings on iOS however and the whole tail section sinks! Why the bloomin hell does it do that now?! @QingyuZhou

    +1
  • EG-0406 1A+A1-1A+A1 4.5 years ago

    Super loco! Btw what’s happening in the 3rd screenshot :)

    +1
  • Convair B-36D Peacemaker (push to platinum) 4.5 years ago

    Holly cow! Never really read into direct cycle , I always thought it was like something out of fallout 3. But yes, I agree it probably would spew radioactive particles far and wide! @TheFantasticTyphoon

    +1
  • Convair B-36D Peacemaker (push to platinum) 4.5 years ago

    I don’t know too much about it but I presume they would have used a pressurised water reactor type and generated steam to power turbines for power etc and would have been, by design a closed system. So I don’t think it would have created fallout as such for people on the ground, but if there’s not much shielding anything metallic on the aircraft would become rather irradiated. Nuclear power is an excellent source of power - it needs to be accident proof though and the waste is pain. Why we just don’t fire all our nuclear waste at the sun beats me. Forgive me, I’m off on a tangent :) @TheFantasticTyphoon

    +1
  • Cessna 182 A-Team special RJ 1.2 4.5 years ago

    Why has there been no A-team builds?!?! Genius!

    +1
  • Convair B-36D Peacemaker (push to platinum) 4.5 years ago

    I know, it took that much shielding just to protect the crew it wasn’t ever going to be feasible. It works on boats/ships as weight isn’t an issue - you’re talking tons of various materials and methods (like putting diesels tanks in the way) just for them to be somewhat “safe” to be near. Even then it’s time limited exposure and you’d probably end up with gamma shine areas where it wouldn’t pay to have a cup of tea in..... Ruskies experimented also - they just wrapped one any/Minimal shielding so it could take off! @TheFantasticTyphoon

    +1
  • Convair B-36D Peacemaker (push to platinum) 4.5 years ago

    whats the reference to the nuclear reactor experiment they rolled on this aircraft. "....and one glowing" :) @TheFantasticTyphoon

    +1