18.9k Thelegitpilot13 Comments

  • Trump Tower 5.2 years ago

    I notice a severe lack of light up “Trump” sign.

    +2
  • "Flaps" Input(uservoice suggestion) 5.2 years ago

    How about something like in Wings of Duty, where rather than a slider, it’s a display and two buttons; one to increase flaps, and one to decrease. So you can choose anywhere from 0°-40° of flaps, and have it so that it goes from 0° to 1° to 5°, 10°, etc.

    +2
  • AN 225 VTOL 5.2 years ago

    Yuktobanian PM: Behold, our superweapon!
    Osean Prez: It’s... just an An-225... what’s so super about that?
    Yuktobanian PM: This!
    Its wings fold up, and it flies away
    Osean Prez: ...
    Yuktobanian PM: Impressive, ri-
    Osean Prez: *on SAT phone * <<Mobius One, engage.>>
    Yuktobanian PM: Oy blyat...

    +2
  • How do I edit my aircrafts description once I have posted it 5.2 years ago

    There’s a little arrow on the side. Click that and you should see “edit”. Click that and change it however you please.

    +2
  • Lift(How really?) 5.2 years ago

    I’m not sure myself, but I have a theory. I believe it’s mainly in the power plant pulling it up, rather than the lift pulling it up. Another part of it is the angle of attack. If the plane were facing upwards, it lessens the effect of lift pulling it down, but if a plane were to fly level upside down, it would lose altitude, but less than it would in free fall, due to the drag of the airframe.

    +2
  • Homecoming 5.2 years ago

    @PvPSky I estimated. But that is quite a bit all things considered

    +2
  • Homecoming 5.2 years ago

    @PvPSky true, considering something like 1.5% of the human population is subbed to him.

    +2
  • Homecoming 5.2 years ago

    @PvPSky Sorry, I'm subbed to Pewds.
    Bobs or vegan-a.

    +2
  • How to land the second highest rated aircraft on SimplePlanes 5.2 years ago

    You see comrades, you forget it is made of Stalinium, which bends all silly capitalist laws of physics to be the strongest and lightest material to ever grace this good Earth! @jamesPLANESii @CjrLdy @BogdanX

    +2
  • Homecoming 5.2 years ago

    T

    +2
  • A criminally underrated plane (sort of) 5.2 years ago

    @IStoleYourMeme true. I’m quite sure the physics changed in the 2 years since it was posted.
    But allow me to summarize this post in a few words:
    .
    OP: Hey, check out this plane. It’s really detailed.
    Me: but the meme will die.
    A-Man: eh, memes aren’t that good here anyways-
    Everyone else: YO THIS PLANE AIN’T EVEN GOOD. SURE THE DETAIL’S GREAT BUT IT’S A S### FLYER.

    +2
  • The Towers July 2001 5.2 years ago

    18 years later, still can’t forget. Still won’t forget. Never forget.

    +2
  • Guys, Belugasub needs your help 5.2 years ago

    Yo, this should be a challenge.

    +2
  • Teaser for my 1920's car. 5.2 years ago

    Pics or it didn’t happen
    I’m excited nonetheless.

    +2
  • My Next Build-Japanese Komet- 5.2 years ago

    BANZAIIIIIIIIIIIIII-

    +2
  • Walkers 5.2 years ago

    (Deep, robotic voice) YOU SHALL KNOW TRUE FEAR, MEATBAG.
    Though, idk how to make walkers. Sorry :\

    +2
  • How do you make thrust vectoring systems? 5.2 years ago

    Ok, I’m also a iOS builder, so I’ll help you out. What I do is set up 2-3 hinge rotators (Pitch-Yaw, Pitch-Roll, 3D) on each other. Then, I add a hollow fuselage (regular fuselages work fine, too) a bit bigger than an afterburner (or whatever engine you wish to use, and attach a fuselage inlet into that. Then, I put the engine on the end, and make it flush with the housing. Then I try to hide the servos as best I can.
    An easier way to have thrust vectoring is to have 2-3 VTOL nozzles set to the different axis. The pro for this is it doesn’t require a lot of parts, but the con is that it doesn’t make the nozzle move.
    Check out my Sukhoi Su-67 and F/A-18EX a show on how it works.

    +2
  • aNoTHer TeASEr?! 5.2 years ago

    @AWESOMENESS360 dang, that’s quite the story!

    +2
  • Chocolate Plaine 5.2 years ago

    Some say he’s still there, singing away on the tarmac through rain, storm, and shine.

    +2
  • Proyect F-15 V 5 5.2 years ago

    @Frenchyfry If you want, I can try fixing it, so you don’t have to. But I will face a similar issue, but I have an idea on how to fix it.

    +2
  • How to build VERY ACCURATE replicas easily! 5.2 years ago

    @jamesPLANESii thou hath opened mine eyes.

    +2
  • Leaving SimplePlanes for a while 5.2 years ago

    Hey, it’s been 4 months. You okay dude?

    +2
  • this guy in minecraft chat 5.2 years ago

    @Wage333 Ah, I see you are a man of culture as well.

    +2
  • Me 262 on steroids 5.2 years ago

    @Noname918181 with mama google, everything can be looked up.

    +2
  • 80 years ago... 5.2 years ago

    World War II... arguably the most defining moment in history, and one of the most important wars technologically.

    +2
  • Soviet Tribute: SimplePlanes 5.2 years ago

    Personally, I don’t like the politics of Russia, but damn do I love their music!

    +2
  • Supermarine Jetfire [Improved version] 5.2 years ago

    Looks good! I agree, the prop-jet combo did look a bit off, but this is a cool adaptation of it!
    @JolyLoly

    +2
  • [SLRP] Discord Server Deleted 5.2 years ago

    Hey guys, I know you’re mad, but let’s not fight over this. Yes, the work is gone, but that means you can rebuild from a new point, and with new players. I know I’m an outsider, but I still don’t want people to fight over something that was meant for fun.

    +2
  • A poem I wrote 5.2 years ago

    @BlackhattAircraft
    Roses are red
    .
    I think you’re quite funny
    .
    Have you heard the tragedy
    .
    Of Solo Wing Pixy the Buddy?

    +2
  • 180 degrees of cockpits 5.2 years ago

    @ACEPILOT109 @Sm10684 with the added benefit of being completely invincible to all explosives and bullets! (Not counting the times where you blew up the cockpit in older models of the game)

    +2
  • plane form... 5.2 years ago

    @TMach5 knew it. Also, if you ever wanted to, you can use some aircraft of mine for those formations. It’s pretty cool to see them.

    +2
  • Water Scheep 5.2 years ago

    *Notices water sheep * Nice
    *Notices part count * NICE

    +2
  • The YB-60 (and B-36) in colour 5.2 years ago

    The B-36 is a really cool craft. They even put a nuclear reactor in it once (though it was more of a proof-of-concept idea and wasn’t connected to anything).

    +2
  • Tu-95 Remastered v.1.02 5.2 years ago

    Blyatiful

    +2
  • We need two more sliders, trim input options, and two more buttons. 5.2 years ago

    Would be useful in certain situations, but might clutter up the screen. Good idea tho.

    +2
  • Jeep Baja Comanche! 5.3 years ago

    As a Wrangler driver, YES.

    +2
  • I'm Back! 5.3 years ago

    Welcome back!

    +2
  • MIK F-37 Stealth Shark 5.3 years ago

    * *Nervous Sukhoi noises *
    But in all seriousness, absolutely *beautiful
    build! I wouldn’t be surprised if this wins. But in any way, I wish you best of luck in the competition!

    +2
  • SLUAV (Update v2) 3 months ago

    Hell yeah, that's awesome! Thanks for using this old skeleton build once more! I know she ain't the most modern, considering fuselage slicing wasn't quite a thing yet, but man you did her justice!

    +1
  • Who are the other moms? 1.5 years ago

    I dunno who the mothers are, but I’m definitely the father. I left with the milk.

    +1
  • Sukhoi Su-47 Berkut ''Golden Eagle'' (WIP) 1.7 years ago

    Hey there,

    Just leaving this comment so I can try and help out later. I currently have a bit going on with life but I’ll help as soon as I can

    +1
  • PW-MK1 1.7 years ago

    Damn, you beat me to it :c

    Fr tho, this is a super nice plane. And the AOA works just like in the game XD

    +1
  • My Hubris is Immeasurable 1.8 years ago

    The pain of big builds with no drag calculation reductions

    +1
  • Criticism that makes a "Military Enthusiast" and a Top Gun fan mad 1.9 years ago

    @ShinyGemsBro Hello there. Sure, the situation isn’t that likely, and it is very scripted. However, it’s still not impossible for it to happen. Both planes were slower and traveling in formation at the beginning of the fight, as compared to going into a merge in the video. Given Maverick is a well experienced fighter in that aircraft, he would recognize that that would be a good time to use that move (which is the first time in the series, mind you).
    .
    The MiG-29 would have been more likely for the Rogue Nation to have. The F-14 was definitely a deus ex machina, since I don’t think Maverick can fly a MiG.
    .
    As for your situation: missiles have set proximity detonation fuses. They cannot be changed by the pilot. I don’t think the missiles would explode after they pass over the adversary, that was definitely odd.
    .
    DCS is not perfect, I can agree on that. However, as I said, it’s 90% of the way there. On top of that, actual USAF squadrons do use it as a training tool due to it being a decent enough simulation of real life. Same thing with France.
    .
    I’ll add here that OP’s point 5 is made in bad faith. Sure, you wouldn’t wanna be in a BVR fight with a MiG-15, that’s how Hangman got his kill. This was not that situation. You also wouldn’t wanna be in a dogfight with a P-51, even in an F-22.
    .
    To summarize, no, it’s not likely. Is it possible? Of course. Will it happen IRL? No. Unlike the movie, the F-14s Iran has are barely flight worthy, if at all. And Su-57s are unlikely to be operated by them as well. It’s a work of fiction at the end of the day.

    +1
  • Opinions that makes a "Military Enthusiast" mad 1.9 years ago

    …Thrust vectoring control is still useful in the unlikely scenario you are in a dogfight. It’s not likely, but Top Gun was founded because the unlikely happened. American aircraft still carry guns because the unlikely happened. The F-22 is still superior to the Su-57, and is a better fighter than the F-35 (F-35 can barely hold 4 AIM-120s inside of it, whereas the F-22 can hold 4 AIM-120s and 2 AIM-9s. The F-22 also completed a test against 4 F-35s, winning a dogfight against all of them). Is it that technologically advanced? No, it’s from the 90’s. But it’s still a top-tier fighter, which is what its role is. You may be a platinum, but don’t let your ego get so high a weather balloon can’t reach you.
    But, if you wanna get your Raptor hate off, the NGADs are set to replace it whenever it’s finally set into service. Then it will relinquish its crown.

    +1
  • Extending Deadline for Production Prototypes Challenge 2.0 years ago

    @ollielebananiaCFSP Thank you for the help with outreach! Others have said they’ve had issues starting due to school, so I’m hoping that this time period would work a little better for most! @Kangy @CharlesDeGaulle That’s fantastic news! I can’t wait to see what y’all come up with!

    +1
  • PF-SA-101 DarkRed 2.0 years ago

    Hoo boy, 135 G’s… That poor pilot’s paste. Still, absolutely beautiful

    +1