@Noname918181 it was a late war british aircraft that entered sevice, it never saw combat. It was supposed to be similar to the spitfire. Further development led to the jet production version, the Attacker FB.1
This might challenge me to make my builds more interesting, especially my fictional ones, I am happy this challenge came to me, especially at the right time :D
I mean I agree with you. I feel like it is also the way the aircraft are presented. With the majority of my builds, if the thumbnail doesn't clearly show the plane, people would not click on it, even though the build has great possibilities. Also people really do take hours and weeks out of their days just for no one to really acknowledge them.
I am an aviation enthusiast myself, but I never looked at simpleplanes has being a realistic game, so that is why I don't hate it. I look more of the user interface (like deleting and adding and moving parts). I hate those parts of the user interface. Otherwise, I wouldn't really spend too much time on talking about how simple planes is unrealistic (because it is) when it is probably just supposed to be a fun little game anyways. You bring up some valid points though.
I was just looking at some of your builds, and realized how simple you do your builds. I like this style, the way you mess around with the cockpits and it looks exactly just like the real one. Keep up the work!
ASMR makes me feel weird
das a big cockpit :D
+1@Hedero lol, I see what you mean though, the front of the plane looks a bit like mine besides the giant engine cooling or intake in the front
@Noname918181 lol, just search it up, you will find some interesting results
@Inuyasha8215 mhm
+1Mmmmm maybe I copy lmao
+1@AviownCorp sure will
+1@ACEPILOT109 finally
@Noname918181 it was a late war british aircraft that entered sevice, it never saw combat. It was supposed to be similar to the spitfire. Further development led to the jet production version, the Attacker FB.1
@Hedero lol
@BlackBoA oh shoot forgot to scale it down at the tip..... Eh it doesn't show too much, only in orthographic view
@Mustang51 ooo thanks!
@RussianAS I tried it on a few of my machines, and it works! Thanks!
@RussianAS ah, okay, seems simple enough.... XD
Quick question, how do you make the custom weapon names, you XML them?
Oooooo Landkreuzer!
I like how German words match English words but the way they are spelt makes way more sense
+3@TrislandianAlliance Oh, okay
Hi, how you make AI aircraft?
+1@Hedero yeah the dimensions seem a bit smaller than the jet appears in image
My favorite plane, it matches my birthday initials :D
I'll make mine smaller >:)
Hmmmm..…. Interesting design...……..
Mmmm nice jet!
@edensk yeah, I'll give you credit on my next build since you did tell me about the drag thing that I didn't know about
+1@edensk sorry, I posted it before you gave me the updated model, I am very sorry though for not giving you credit.
@mikoyanster roger that' thanks for the response 😃
Yeah, you are following my footsteps aren't you... You don't see that many SU-25 frogfoots posted on the site, so you did a good job, an original.
+1Can I use a propulsion that is not a jet, or does it have to be a jet engine that powers the plane?
This might challenge me to make my builds more interesting, especially my fictional ones, I am happy this challenge came to me, especially at the right time :D
I mean I agree with you. I feel like it is also the way the aircraft are presented. With the majority of my builds, if the thumbnail doesn't clearly show the plane, people would not click on it, even though the build has great possibilities. Also people really do take hours and weeks out of their days just for no one to really acknowledge them.
I am an aviation enthusiast myself, but I never looked at simpleplanes has being a realistic game, so that is why I don't hate it. I look more of the user interface (like deleting and adding and moving parts). I hate those parts of the user interface. Otherwise, I wouldn't really spend too much time on talking about how simple planes is unrealistic (because it is) when it is probably just supposed to be a fun little game anyways. You bring up some valid points though.
+1@Mustang51 you are welcome 😃
+1here's mine! https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/403IxJ/Mitsubishi-A6M2-N-Rufe-France
+1I missed you lmao
+1yaaay he's back
+1@Gameboi14 I have no idea XD, I just came back and see you at 18.5k points
sniff sniff I remember when I made XML gears for him.... cries
+1THATS MY BOY
MMMM so you wanna make a naval flying boat. I got you....
@ACEPILOT109 oh okay
Where are the jets at the tips of the rotor? It was powered by that not the motor. Well it is Simpleplanes so it would be hard to implement
+1@Mustang51 sure thing :D
Seaplanes are allowed right? Or do they have to have to actually be able to land o n the aircraft carrier itself?
-EDIT-
Nevermind, yes you can, just read the instructions
@XxMegamonsterxX yas
+1Aight time to make a post war naval fighter
+1I was just looking at some of your builds, and realized how simple you do your builds. I like this style, the way you mess around with the cockpits and it looks exactly just like the real one. Keep up the work!
@pura ah i see.
Why are there weight restrictions? (Just curious)
so glorious
@ACEPILOT109 hah lol, I am currently on a build.