Basically No.5 (What) was built around a concept, that didn't work. It was slow, heavy for its size and a failure. Unlike designs with effort (like the F-93 Saturn) it simply flew for a bit. In the right hands I have no doubt it could escape trouble easily, but in the hands of AI that wasn't gonna happen.
Entry's So far
The classic ramp
Pinewood Pioneer
Tubular trace
Hatchback
literally just a frame
Dragster
T3
Duck head
Basic mobile
Thing
2007 Ford
Velocity super
Formula 5
Formula O R
Tin torpedo
The dimensions box
That thing from trackmania
(Names may be entirely made up by me for effect)
(Reposted for my personal sake)
@Vader_plays109 our weapons share a name and idea but are fairly different
They're the same sort of weapon, but I did not know of your design whilst building this.
It is also highly unlikely that you are the first person to build a nuclear cannon, considering I've built extreme weapon prototypes for a fair bit before you made yours
I'm pulling my entry (the rocketeer) out of the competition due to the fact that I have designed much better airframes in the past. I will presumably be entering with 1 of them.
Ok so from what I can tell the COM is behind the COL. there are 2 ways to fix this. 1: Make a plane so small that this won't be a problem (my preferred solution) or 2: Listen to JediWolf.
Entry's So far
The classic ramp
Pinewood Pioneer
Tubular trace
Hatchback
literally just a frame
Dragster
T3
Duck head
Basic mobile
Thing
2007 Ford
Velocity super
Formula 5
Formula O R
Tin torpedo
The dimensions box
(Names may be entirely made up by me for effect)
(Next update 7-9am GMT)
It has so many drag points my IPad suggested I try to call the number
+6Geez this thing makes a Bob Semple look like an Abrams
+3@Darg12e if you aim it at the nearest mountain it might be less... hand burning
+2The boat is good but this is our last haven from American politics please don't
+2You threw an A10 and your style together and created a better HE-173. Honestly in awe
+2First up after another server crash.
Very impressive
+2On low physics these things loose the tracks faster than I lost my hope in humanity
+2Basically No.5 (What) was built around a concept, that didn't work. It was slow, heavy for its size and a failure. Unlike designs with effort (like the F-93 Saturn) it simply flew for a bit. In the right hands I have no doubt it could escape trouble easily, but in the hands of AI that wasn't gonna happen.
+2@ChristianBoer serious. It's not a problem, I just find it hilarious
+2Entry's So far
+2The classic ramp
Pinewood Pioneer
Tubular trace
Hatchback
literally just a frame
Dragster
T3
Duck head
Basic mobile
Thing
2007 Ford
Velocity super
Formula 5
Formula O R
Tin torpedo
The dimensions box
That thing from trackmania
(Names may be entirely made up by me for effect)
(Reposted for my personal sake)
THE LEANING TOWER OF CITROEN
+2Why did you make my Ex Girlfriend?
+2@LlamaIndustries XML modding. Explosion value for the cannon is in the game already.
+1@WeaponsTesting I left it on 1 second because just LOOKING at the explosion from a distance of ~3000 meters is enough to knock out my game
+1@Vader_plays109 our weapons share a name and idea but are fairly different
They're the same sort of weapon, but I did not know of your design whilst building this.
It is also highly unlikely that you are the first person to build a nuclear cannon, considering I've built extreme weapon prototypes for a fair bit before you made yours
+1@MuggedCup that's a problem I encountered during testing and I'll advertise that fact as a feature
+1Please don't use profanity in aircraft descriptions
+1@Stratus I'd prefer to have your twitter just so I can send you what I wanna say because otherwise I'd be banned
+1@Zoowarp I actually dare you to do it
+1@BACconcordepilot it's France when not surrendering or revolting, you need to have exactly zero expectations
+1@Armyguy1534 С Рождеством
+1(Fires once)
+1(Ends up in Australia)
(Stalls at 900mph)
+1Magnificent
@randomusername well we both have our methods, mine more rigid and yours more fluid. I respect you for that
+1Peppy pig. Brilliant for target practice
+1I still hold the unmodded record
+1Like the LMS Turbomotive but R I P P E D
+1UYP
+1(Unidentified Yorkshire Pudding)
KV-34, destroyer of turret rings.
+1It got hit by debris from a random AI plane and still worked perfectly so that's probably a good sign.
+1Well it's more creative than my use of the weapon (see the UC-98 Pershing), which used a stock airframe, uncreative name and some other weapons)
+1I generally prefer to build fictional. It generally leads me to feel more free with my designs, and has lead to some bangers TBH.
+1This is actually brilliant.
+1Bob Semple tank.
+1Quite the unfortunate name
+1I'm pulling my entry (the rocketeer) out of the competition due to the fact that I have designed much better airframes in the past. I will presumably be entering with 1 of them.
+1After the Notre Dame and Portugal Bus crash I am now certain we can't go a week without tragedy
+1"Designed to fly at night". Just cover it in High Visibility Jackets.
+1Ok so from what I can tell the COM is behind the COL. there are 2 ways to fix this. 1: Make a plane so small that this won't be a problem (my preferred solution) or 2: Listen to JediWolf.
+1It's already on a creation
+1@connect your simpleplanes account to the game and hit the "share aircraft" button
+1Not to be confused with the Elefant tank destroyer
+1Oh damn. I've been making these for a year
+1It can fly. 'Nuff said
+1I have edited the Pinewood pioneer to fit within the specified area
+1Entry's So far
+1The classic ramp
Pinewood Pioneer
Tubular trace
Hatchback
literally just a frame
Dragster
T3
Duck head
Basic mobile
Thing
2007 Ford
Velocity super
Formula 5
Formula O R
Tin torpedo
The dimensions box
(Names may be entirely made up by me for effect)
(Next update 7-9am GMT)
I've been making planes for a long blooming time and I must say this is very good!
+1(Edmund Fitzgerald intensifies)
+1Mama Mia
+1I don't know how I feel about this.
+1