@Korsamnang A honey badger is an animal. It is also the namesake of the real life weapon AAC Honey Badger PDW. Call of Duty didn't just make up the gun, it's a real thing.
Part efficiency is non existent. Part count has been heavily prioritized on weaponry, which leaves the ship looking empty and bland, even though its high part count. Parts of the ship look unfinished. Having a 750 part CIWS that uses is not justifiable when there are massive parts (20x 20 meter or more) just empty.
Using very simple part efficiency tricks - like using hollow fuselages instead of normal fuselages to make grids; using only 1 set of parts for symmetrical decals; etc - this build would not be more than 5k parts.
It's not often that I have to remove upvote, but this is a case in which I have to.
@Diver neutral steering as far as I know means that when rotating on the spot one track will rotate forward and the other backward. most tanks of the time had (except like British and stuff) just rotated a single track forward or backward, while keeping the other one stationary.
bedsprings are the grids/nets that you had on your earlier tank.
greebles is a general term for all kinds of small details that decorate the build.
@Diver A few things that you can add to performance using FT.
-when not pressing W it should slow down a lot quicker. you can do this by using FT for the braking
-the tank slips out at high speeds in sharp angles
-the tank has neutral steering, which is very unlikely for a Polish 1947 tank
Note: my scale ranges from 0 to 10. Everything from a 5-10 is positive. Everything from a 0-5 is negative. This means that this build gives me positive feelings. It is a good score.
Shape: 9.5/10
I genuinely love the shape on this one. The KV style lower glacis, IS upper glacis and KV (but way bigger) turret. I also really love the way that the hull becomes slimmer towards the rear. Very interesting.
Running gear: 3/10
Tracks_2 without dummy suspension is still not impressive. I hope you would have improved this.
Greebles: 6/10
You removed the bed springs from your last tank, which is a very good thing. However a side effect of this is that the rest of the tank looks underdetailed. You can't just remove the bedsprings and not any more greebles under it and expect it to look better. Use the parts you shaved off by removing the bedsprings to create more details.
Decals and paint scheme: 8.5/10
The colour is still quite saturated. The decals are nearing perfection (aside of part efficiency). The paint scheme contains a bit too much grey and red.
Performance: 7/10
You didn't noticeably improve on the performance. Custom code for the tracks would be appreciated. Roof MG doesn't work and actually just damages your own tank at some angles.
Conclusion: 6.8/10
Though an objective improvement over your last tank, it isn't as much of an improvement as I had hoped. A lot of things that I pointed out in the initial review you never used. You did improve on the shape and decals.
Things that I do like:
decals give the tank a lot of character and look quite good
I love the idea of a gun that big, and it's executed well
I like the idea of a stolen MG (even tho you probably just did it cuz you didn't wanna make one from scratch)
I love the shape and design of the tank
I like the spaced addon armour (though unnecessary on rear of turret)
these addon plates are also a smart way to fit flat decals to a round turret, very creative
the performance in game is generally very good (though on the boring side)
Things that I don't like: (don't read if you don't like nit picking)
there is z-fighting on the upper glacis, which is unacceptable
the MGs are not custom. with just a 4 parts you can make them look a lot better than just the stock winggun.
the front fenders are very badly supported and would easily bend irl
why does the assistent driver have more periscopes than the actual driver??
since when do tanks have chains?
chains are horribly part inefficient compared to cables
there is an excessive amount of red paint on this tank
why does the rear turret have added spaced armour? waste of weight and steel
there is no gunner sight, just a periscope
there is an excessive amount of grey paint on this tank (some parts that are grey would irl be painted green)
you didnt improve on the running gear
the tank slips out of control when doing sharp high speed turns
the glass of the periscopes is too small to actually fit in the frame
the commanders hatch doesn't have any hinges (internal hinge??)
squary decal is offensively part inefficient (so easy to fix)
drivers view port looks out of place and underdetailed
the tracer colours are unrealistic and stock
First let me quickly go over the parts that you didn't make yourself. I still think that you as the poster are responsible for any lacks in quality, since you were the one to put them on your tank.
Bear Claw Decal
The looks on this decal are quite good. I like it a lot actually. Sadly, like all of Strucker's decals (that I'm aware of), it's horribly part inefficient.
Looks: 8/10
Part efficiency: 3/10
Conclusion: 5.5/10
MG 42
It looks pretty good, as expected from RussianAce. However the way you implemented it is pretty bad. The laying of the MG is not even functional, but the wingGun itself is. You should've either made it entirely functional, or removed the wing gun.
Part efficiency is good on this MG, and replica accuracy is alright.
Looks: 7/10
Functionality: 0/10
Part efficiency: 8/10
Conclusion: 5/10
Screenshots:
The framing on the screenshots is alright. I really don't like the thumbnail, it doesn't show the build well at all. Only like 30% of the frame is the tank. Try to get that up to around 75%.
Lighting is generally pretty good.
The map does fit the tank pretty well, and it's a well made map.
There is no reshade used, which is just not of this time anymore. Reshade is a necessity, especially if you're letting someone else take your screenshots.
The thumbnail is bad, because it doesn't frame the tank well enough and the tank doesn't have enough contrast with the background (blending in). Also the text is very simplistic. I preferred the thumbnails of your previous tank.
@Kennneth but yeah, make a WWII bombed/destroyed city. Berlin, or Stalingrad, Dresden or whatever. Just a single crossing (like the map I used) is fine for screenshots.
Epic.
it's offbeat ://////
this smells like bs
+5weebs are oppressed in this community
+4@Kangy How is what I said in any way perfectionist?
@Korsamnang A honey badger is an animal. It is also the namesake of the real life weapon AAC Honey Badger PDW. Call of Duty didn't just make up the gun, it's a real thing.
@Diver Everyone kept telling him.
Those tiny wheels are just... ugh
+3This is pretty decent
@ChrisPy Did I ask?
4: cri-cri can't be locked on by IR missiles because of futuristic low-heat emission design
+6Reject gyroscopes
+4Return to FT
@UnguidedCylinder Well, the "remove upvote" thing is just a meme, obviously.
+1Part efficiency is non existent. Part count has been heavily prioritized on weaponry, which leaves the ship looking empty and bland, even though its high part count. Parts of the ship look unfinished. Having a 750 part CIWS that uses is not justifiable when there are massive parts (20x 20 meter or more) just empty.
Using very simple part efficiency tricks - like using hollow fuselages instead of normal fuselages to make grids; using only 1 set of parts for symmetrical decals; etc - this build would not be more than 5k parts.
It's not often that I have to remove upvote, but this is a case in which I have to.
Please upovote
you can't get babies with an anime girl
+9@edensk cry harder
Can I know who makes these?
This is pretty good. Well done.
@WolfSpark Are you a WWII tanker?
@bogdanx why did you delete your comment lol
+1@Diver neutral steering as far as I know means that when rotating on the spot one track will rotate forward and the other backward. most tanks of the time had (except like British and stuff) just rotated a single track forward or backward, while keeping the other one stationary.
bedsprings are the grids/nets that you had on your earlier tank.
greebles is a general term for all kinds of small details that decorate the build.
DebugExpression "round(rate(TAS) * 10) / 10"
gives you the acceleration in m/s^2 rounded to 1 decimal.
@Diver A few things that you can add to performance using FT.
-when not pressing W it should slow down a lot quicker. you can do this by using FT for the braking
-the tank slips out at high speeds in sharp angles
-the tank has neutral steering, which is very unlikely for a Polish 1947 tank
Note: my scale ranges from 0 to 10. Everything from a 5-10 is positive. Everything from a 0-5 is negative. This means that this build gives me positive feelings. It is a good score.
Shape: 9.5/10
I genuinely love the shape on this one. The KV style lower glacis, IS upper glacis and KV (but way bigger) turret. I also really love the way that the hull becomes slimmer towards the rear. Very interesting.
Running gear: 3/10
Tracks_2 without dummy suspension is still not impressive. I hope you would have improved this.
Greebles: 6/10
You removed the bed springs from your last tank, which is a very good thing. However a side effect of this is that the rest of the tank looks underdetailed. You can't just remove the bedsprings and not any more greebles under it and expect it to look better. Use the parts you shaved off by removing the bedsprings to create more details.
Decals and paint scheme: 8.5/10
The colour is still quite saturated. The decals are nearing perfection (aside of part efficiency). The paint scheme contains a bit too much grey and red.
Performance: 7/10
You didn't noticeably improve on the performance. Custom code for the tracks would be appreciated. Roof MG doesn't work and actually just damages your own tank at some angles.
Conclusion: 6.8/10
Though an objective improvement over your last tank, it isn't as much of an improvement as I had hoped. A lot of things that I pointed out in the initial review you never used. You did improve on the shape and decals.
@Diver my criticism about vision was about the lack of gun sight. KV and basically all tanks have this
Things that I do like:
decals give the tank a lot of character and look quite good
I love the idea of a gun that big, and it's executed well
I like the idea of a stolen MG (even tho you probably just did it cuz you didn't wanna make one from scratch)
I love the shape and design of the tank
I like the spaced addon armour (though unnecessary on rear of turret)
these addon plates are also a smart way to fit flat decals to a round turret, very creative
the performance in game is generally very good (though on the boring side)
Things that I don't like: (don't read if you don't like nit picking)
there is z-fighting on the upper glacis, which is unacceptable
the MGs are not custom. with just a 4 parts you can make them look a lot better than just the stock winggun.
the front fenders are very badly supported and would easily bend irl
why does the assistent driver have more periscopes than the actual driver??
since when do tanks have chains?
chains are horribly part inefficient compared to cables
there is an excessive amount of red paint on this tank
why does the rear turret have added spaced armour? waste of weight and steel
there is no gunner sight, just a periscope
there is an excessive amount of grey paint on this tank (some parts that are grey would irl be painted green)
you didnt improve on the running gear
the tank slips out of control when doing sharp high speed turns
the glass of the periscopes is too small to actually fit in the frame
the commanders hatch doesn't have any hinges (internal hinge??)
squary decal is offensively part inefficient (so easy to fix)
drivers view port looks out of place and underdetailed
the tracer colours are unrealistic and stock
First let me quickly go over the parts that you didn't make yourself. I still think that you as the poster are responsible for any lacks in quality, since you were the one to put them on your tank.
Bear Claw Decal
The looks on this decal are quite good. I like it a lot actually. Sadly, like all of Strucker's decals (that I'm aware of), it's horribly part inefficient.
Looks: 8/10
Part efficiency: 3/10
Conclusion: 5.5/10
MG 42
It looks pretty good, as expected from RussianAce. However the way you implemented it is pretty bad. The laying of the MG is not even functional, but the wingGun itself is. You should've either made it entirely functional, or removed the wing gun.
Part efficiency is good on this MG, and replica accuracy is alright.
Looks: 7/10
Functionality: 0/10
Part efficiency: 8/10
Conclusion: 5/10
Screenshots:
The framing on the screenshots is alright. I really don't like the thumbnail, it doesn't show the build well at all. Only like 30% of the frame is the tank. Try to get that up to around 75%.
Lighting is generally pretty good.
The map does fit the tank pretty well, and it's a well made map.
There is no reshade used, which is just not of this time anymore. Reshade is a necessity, especially if you're letting someone else take your screenshots.
The thumbnail is bad, because it doesn't frame the tank well enough and the tank doesn't have enough contrast with the background (blending in). Also the text is very simplistic. I preferred the thumbnails of your previous tank.
Framing: 6/10
Lighting: 9/10
Map: 7/10
Reshade: 0/10
Conclusion: 5.5/10
I will do a review of this build comparing it to your Progetto P. 75 Mod. 51 Serpente. I will be referring to my review of said tank as well.
KV-6 is already a post war made up super heavy tank, so go with SU-6-1.
@Kennneth but yeah, make a WWII bombed/destroyed city. Berlin, or Stalingrad, Dresden or whatever. Just a single crossing (like the map I used) is fine for screenshots.
@Kennneth they are. just like 2 streets and it's eating like 15 gigs of my SSD
I love tease and denial.
clamp it lol
Can you like read your Discord DMs?
46 people are angry 13 year olds
+1the standard to get featured is so low these days
+4yikes
+1amogus
activate windows
+1@TheEnglishPanzer Yeah I agree!!
btw what /s mean?
I like what you did with the turret. Organic cast turrets are always difficult in SP, but this is executed pretty smoothly.
types of racism in SP:
Number 15. SPBC Moderator feature racism
@Tookan Likely not.
@asteroidbook345 good luck stealing an unuploaded build.
+1@RandomUser09 I literally never promised anything
I wonder where you got that name from HMMMMMMMMM
doesn't look finished. I had high hopes for this
femoid detected