Universalized revamped fuselage blocks
I don't know whether this is possible because of backwards compatibility and such, but I'll leave this suggestion anyway.
Integration of all variables
All fuselage blocks will be added together into a single block. This block simply called "fuselage" has toggle able transparency, hollowness, coneness. It will also of course have dead weight, fuel, buoyancy, thickness, inlet angle, height/width/length/run/rise.
This would allow for some new cool things like glass cones and it would also make everything more organized (in my opinion).
Partial fuselage
There would also be an option to make the fuselage a half fuselage or even a quarter fuselage. This would be very useful when building, especially when making interiors, cockpits etc.
This could be set up using an angle. The default would be 360, half 180 and quarter 90. This would allow for even more shapes, like 45* fuselages or whatever.
(Because of the way fuselages are modelled maybe it's only possible to change this angle in steps of 15, since the fuselage block is a polygon with angles of 15.) Advanced corner types
Add a corner type with a slider from 0 to 1, 1 is perfectly circular, 0 is perfectly hard. Conclusion
I think this would be great, although it's probably a little ambitious. If only parts of my suggestion could be integrated that would still be awesome.
WOW! JUST WOW. 😱 EVERYBODY 🙇👴 IS ✅ JUST ☠ CHEATING. 😤 And I'm 🙅 just here... 📌🤙 Scrolling... With 🐝 my 👦 finger... Like 👍 a 😜👏 normal 🖖 human 👩 being. 😑😑 AND THESE PEOPLE 👨👨 ARE 👴 JUST 🕛 CHEATING. 😠 MY FINGER IS 💰📃 BLEEDING. IF I KEEP 👌 SCROLLING 😂 I 😉 WILL BLEED 💉 OUT. 💯 Please 💘 just 😡🍆 ban 👏🚫 these 😍🍆 cheaters, okay? Please 😖🙏 Jundroo! Jundroo I gave 🎁 you 👨👉 over ⤵👇 1.3 ⬇♂ Megawatts of power, 🏼⚡ please 💕🙏 just listen to me, okay! I saved 😉🆘 you ♿🦃 guys 😍👨 SO 🏻💯 MUCH 😩🙌 money AND 🍆 THESE ❌🤢 FRICKING CHEATERS ARE JUST 😐😤 TAKING 💅 IT ALL 😄👌 AWAY 💨🏽 FROM ME. 🎓⬆ REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE @AndrewGarrison @WNP78 @PhilipTarpley
You guys should include a pinned comment with links to all the builds and their creators. That would make it a lot easier to actually test out the builds yourself.
@Mostly YES I WILl! I really hope he will give me a personal video tutorial on how to make custom control services!!!1 BOGDANX IS THE BEST PLAYER ON THE SIMPLEPLANES!!!1 I would pay him my allowance if he could teach me how to get better!!!
The thing ⏮ I really 💪 like 🍪 about 🤖💦 Planes is 🙀 that 💦➡ we 🔞👵 learn 👨 that 🙋 WWII happened in 👏 the 👏🤠 Cars universe. 🎇 Which 🥙 means there 🏿👉 was 👏☝ a 👏 Cars Hitler, 💞😍 a 👌 Cars 🚗 holocaust, a 👌 Cars ☠ Pacific 🌊🌊 War, 💯 a Cars 🚗🚗 D-Day, a Cars 😡😡 nuking of 🍆💯 Hiroshima and 🍆 Nagasaki, a Cars Rape of 🎖🚋 Nanking, a Cars Battle of Iwo Jima... This 🔴 leads to so 😮 many important ✅ questions, like: 😎 were the 🤴😃 Cars 🚗 Little ⌚ Boy 👉 and 🙅 Fat Man 🤔 nukes 🚀🎆 sentient? Was 👏👏 it a suicide 🔪😔 mission? Are ALL Cars nuclear 💥😏 weapons sentient? Did 👉 Tsar Bomba have 🈶🏋 a 💰 personality? 😍 What 😤🙏 kind of car 🍳 was 🔙💦 Car Hitler? A VW? A 💰🌉 forklift? Was 💦🏻 there ✔ a 💰😄 Cars ☠ 9/11? Were 👬😍 the planes hijacked, or 🏼 were 👀 the 😎 planes themselves 👧👩 radicalized? I 👵🙅 could go 🛫✅ on
I think you aren't quite hitting it on the nail. I think the true problem with why SimplePlanes content creation is so hard is because people spend so much time on builds. How are you gonna explain in a short form video how to make a build that maybe takes 20 hours to complete?
Will there be any regulation and enforcing on not using this feature? For example still uploading a separate public build that has minor improvements/fixes? This could be seen as abusing the system to gain more points.
I think you scaled a part wrong. You should always keep the scale even, so 2,2,2 or 0.5,0.5,0.5. If you scale for example 0.5,5,2 the lighting will mess up.
I will give this tank a review, since i feel like I am certified to do so, since I have made a Panzer III myself.
Note: my scale ranges from 0 to 10. Everything from a 5-10 is positive. Everything from a 0-5 is negative. This means that this build gives me positive feelings. It is a good score.
Shape: 5/10
The tank is about 70% too big.
Let's start to talk about the general shape. The turret is so incredibly slim that I really doubt that you even used a blueprint. This causes the basket on the rear of the turret to look comically slim.
Also the turret cheeks don't look on point. Besides that the turret roof isn't partially slanted like it should be.
You didn't even try to curve the rear of the turret (I know, that is hard to do).
The hull shape looks decent at first glance, but there is definitely something wrong with the rear of it. You should've used a blueprint in case you didn't. If you did use a blueprint you should've followed it more carefully.
Running Gear: 8/10
I really like the way you made the tracks themselves. They are reasonably part efficient and look great. Though I feel the shape and quantity of the little hollow fuselages on the inside of the tracks are off.
The suspension system is nice. It is adequately detailed. However the torsion bars are too high on the hull. Also the little parts that stop the torsion bars from moving too far are very inaccurate (thereby wasting quite some parts). They should just be simple triangular-like wedges.
The side hatches are just extremely thick and therefore I can't take them seriously.
The sprocket wheel has too many teeth and is basically just a cylinder with 2D texture on it.
The road wheels are decent, but maybe a bit too simple. Also the gap down the middle is way too wide.
The idler wheel is way too thin and it makes the whole running gear look very flimsy.
The tracks are too wide which makes them clip into the hull. Overall I respect that you even tried making a custom running gear instead of simply using the Tracks_2 mod.
I have quite some time ago transitioned to making all connections manually. This means that whenever I place a new block I remove all connections and add the connections I want manually.
What is also useful, especially on builds with moving parts like your swing wing, is temporarily nudging out the moving part that you are working on. This way you won't get any automatic connections to parts that you don't want it to connect to.
This is way better than that F-14 that got featured the other week. I have no clue why you are not featured. You are both silver users, and your plane is just better in every single way.
Universalized revamped fuselage blocks
I don't know whether this is possible because of backwards compatibility and such, but I'll leave this suggestion anyway.
Integration of all variables
All fuselage blocks will be added together into a single block. This block simply called "fuselage" has toggle able transparency, hollowness, coneness. It will also of course have dead weight, fuel, buoyancy, thickness, inlet angle, height/width/length/run/rise.
This would allow for some new cool things like glass cones and it would also make everything more organized (in my opinion).
Partial fuselage
+27There would also be an option to make the fuselage a half fuselage or even a quarter fuselage. This would be very useful when building, especially when making interiors, cockpits etc.
This could be set up using an angle. The default would be 360, half 180 and quarter 90. This would allow for even more shapes, like 45* fuselages or whatever.
(Because of the way fuselages are modelled maybe it's only possible to change this angle in steps of 15, since the fuselage block is a polygon with angles of 15.)
Advanced corner types
Add a corner type with a slider from 0 to 1, 1 is perfectly circular, 0 is perfectly hard.
Conclusion
I think this would be great, although it's probably a little ambitious. If only parts of my suggestion could be integrated that would still be awesome.
WOW! JUST WOW. 😱 EVERYBODY 🙇👴 IS ✅ JUST ☠ CHEATING. 😤 And I'm 🙅 just here... 📌🤙 Scrolling... With 🐝 my 👦 finger... Like 👍 a 😜👏 normal 🖖 human 👩 being. 😑😑 AND THESE PEOPLE 👨👨 ARE 👴 JUST 🕛 CHEATING. 😠 MY FINGER IS 💰📃 BLEEDING. IF I KEEP 👌 SCROLLING 😂 I 😉 WILL BLEED 💉 OUT. 💯 Please 💘 just 😡🍆 ban 👏🚫 these 😍🍆 cheaters, okay? Please 😖🙏 Jundroo! Jundroo I gave 🎁 you 👨👉 over ⤵👇 1.3 ⬇♂ Megawatts of power, 🏼⚡ please 💕🙏 just listen to me, okay! I saved 😉🆘 you ♿🦃 guys 😍👨 SO 🏻💯 MUCH 😩🙌 money AND 🍆 THESE ❌🤢 FRICKING CHEATERS ARE JUST 😐😤 TAKING 💅 IT ALL 😄👌 AWAY 💨🏽 FROM ME. 🎓⬆ REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE @AndrewGarrison @WNP78 @PhilipTarpley
+16Yo dude, do you have an onlyfans?
+15minion peepee 😳😳😳
+9you can't get babies with an anime girl
+9oh god. your understanding of what the job of a developer is is just not accurate. so yeah, no.
+9nice F-100D replica!
+9Here is a nice high quality image for you ;)
+8Suffering from success
+7You guys should include a pinned comment with links to all the builds and their creators. That would make it a lot easier to actually test out the builds yourself.
+7Nice, this is useful.
+64: cri-cri can't be locked on by IR missiles because of futuristic low-heat emission design
+6Right now in the game a camera will not render anything that's too close to it. Remove that, if possible.
+5this smells like bs
+5This is just honestly disrespectfully bad
+5@Mostly YES I WILl! I really hope he will give me a personal video tutorial on how to make custom control services!!!1 BOGDANX IS THE BEST PLAYER ON THE SIMPLEPLANES!!!1 I would pay him my allowance if he could teach me how to get better!!!
+5The thing ⏮ I really 💪 like 🍪 about 🤖💦 Planes is 🙀 that 💦➡ we 🔞👵 learn 👨 that 🙋 WWII happened in 👏 the 👏🤠 Cars universe. 🎇 Which 🥙 means there 🏿👉 was 👏☝ a 👏 Cars Hitler, 💞😍 a 👌 Cars 🚗 holocaust, a 👌 Cars ☠ Pacific 🌊🌊 War, 💯 a Cars 🚗🚗 D-Day, a Cars 😡😡 nuking of 🍆💯 Hiroshima and 🍆 Nagasaki, a Cars Rape of 🎖🚋 Nanking, a Cars Battle of Iwo Jima... This 🔴 leads to so 😮 many important ✅ questions, like: 😎 were the 🤴😃 Cars 🚗 Little ⌚ Boy 👉 and 🙅 Fat Man 🤔 nukes 🚀🎆 sentient? Was 👏👏 it a suicide 🔪😔 mission? Are ALL Cars nuclear 💥😏 weapons sentient? Did 👉 Tsar Bomba have 🈶🏋 a 💰 personality? 😍 What 😤🙏 kind of car 🍳 was 🔙💦 Car Hitler? A VW? A 💰🌉 forklift? Was 💦🏻 there ✔ a 💰😄 Cars ☠ 9/11? Were 👬😍 the planes hijacked, or 🏼 were 👀 the 😎 planes themselves 👧👩 radicalized? I 👵🙅 could go 🛫✅ on
+5Damn you're salty
+4Awful everything
+4I think you aren't quite hitting it on the nail. I think the true problem with why SimplePlanes content creation is so hard is because people spend so much time on builds. How are you gonna explain in a short form video how to make a build that maybe takes 20 hours to complete?
+4Everyone that voted for the phantom should step on a lego
+4Cease your investigations.
+4weebs are oppressed in this community
+4Reject gyroscopes
+4Return to FT
the standard to get featured is so low these days
+4@KnightOfRen could you please remove your upvote?
+4Can I use the gun on my ship?
+3This did not age well
+3Will there be any regulation and enforcing on not using this feature? For example still uploading a separate public build that has minor improvements/fixes? This could be seen as abusing the system to gain more points.
+3@asteroidbook345 I dare you to steal the hull and make an SU-152
+3Those tiny wheels are just... ugh
+3I think you scaled a part wrong. You should always keep the scale even, so 2,2,2 or 0.5,0.5,0.5. If you scale for example 0.5,5,2 the lighting will mess up.
+3@BOGDANX @BOGDANX @BOGDANX
+3the
+3ducc
meme
is
dead
7 inches is pretty big. 5 is average.
+3Wait, are you two actually married? That's so great! Congratz!
+3@russianspy you were literally 6 when baconeggs was active
+3@KnightOfRen tagging people like this is truly cancerous.
+3I will give this tank a review, since i feel like I am certified to do so, since I have made a Panzer III myself.
Note: my scale ranges from 0 to 10. Everything from a 5-10 is positive. Everything from a 0-5 is negative. This means that this build gives me positive feelings. It is a good score.
Shape: 5/10
The tank is about 70% too big.
Let's start to talk about the general shape. The turret is so incredibly slim that I really doubt that you even used a blueprint. This causes the basket on the rear of the turret to look comically slim.
Also the turret cheeks don't look on point. Besides that the turret roof isn't partially slanted like it should be.
You didn't even try to curve the rear of the turret (I know, that is hard to do).
The hull shape looks decent at first glance, but there is definitely something wrong with the rear of it.
You should've used a blueprint in case you didn't. If you did use a blueprint you should've followed it more carefully.
Running Gear: 8/10
I really like the way you made the tracks themselves. They are reasonably part efficient and look great. Though I feel the shape and quantity of the little hollow fuselages on the inside of the tracks are off.
The suspension system is nice. It is adequately detailed. However the torsion bars are too high on the hull. Also the little parts that stop the torsion bars from moving too far are very inaccurate (thereby wasting quite some parts). They should just be simple triangular-like wedges.
The side hatches are just extremely thick and therefore I can't take them seriously.
The sprocket wheel has too many teeth and is basically just a cylinder with 2D texture on it.
The road wheels are decent, but maybe a bit too simple. Also the gap down the middle is way too wide.
The idler wheel is way too thin and it makes the whole running gear look very flimsy.
The tracks are too wide which makes them clip into the hull.
Overall I respect that you even tried making a custom running gear instead of simply using the Tracks_2 mod.
+3
Some people might miss you.
+3he is not handsome
+3I have quite some time ago transitioned to making all connections manually. This means that whenever I place a new block I remove all connections and add the connections I want manually.
+3What is also useful, especially on builds with moving parts like your swing wing, is temporarily nudging out the moving part that you are working on. This way you won't get any automatic connections to parts that you don't want it to connect to.
Don't toot your own horn too much there, bud.
+3vibes
+3Damn that description looks like straight propaganda lmao
+2F-16 > F-35
+2Legacy Hornet > Super Hornet
RADAR = useless
Air to air missiles = useless
Dogfighting > BVR
This is way better than that F-14 that got featured the other week. I have no clue why you are not featured. You are both silver users, and your plane is just better in every single way.
+2Is Amalia your crush?
+2*quiet
+2Combusted randomly in flight. Instructions not in game. 2/5
+2