@RepublicOfCursedPlanes
here's what I have to say about your counterarguments:
delta wings are terrible for subsonic speeds, why? energy retention
wait, so what you're saying is that you put a canard that is inches away from touching the wing? wtf
I don't question the intake placement, but I question your control surfaces now what in the world
unlike the F-16, this thing looks like the moment it stalls out, it's unrecoverable no matter what you do
I don't mean that the landing gear is too low, I mean that the landing gear has no space (realistically) for it to retract, because it's taken up by the engine placement (this doesn't apply in SP ofc because SP's morfology can be easily bypassed lmfao)
I have no comments for the last 2 points
other than that, you're welcome
appearance review:
8/10
woaou
design looks very plausible for supersonic flight, albeit, just above transonic
looks somewhat maneuverable, but still looks like it has a positive stability design
that wingtip pylon does not look fine lmao
this looks very plausible for a 90s era jet
appearance review:
7/10
that moment when no radar.
why is the gun on the nose, a10 style
I mean, I would understand why if you used a rotary cannon but this is an autocannon, moreover single barreled
that, said nice design, very plausible for it's time
looks pretty maneuverable, and stable
kinda like the F-5
yeag
appearance review:
5/10
for it's class, this definitely does not fit lmao :v
this is definitely a bomber, not an LCA
although, granted it only has 1 engine
atop of the tail
that's gonna be an issue, yikes
appearaance review:
8/10
I love this Imma be honest with you
chubby lil plane, perfect for attacking ground targets, vietnam style
very, very plausible design for a 70s aircraft, also looks very versatile
fuselage looks long enough, you can basically turn this thing into a supersonic aircraft by putting on afterburner engines like real
IT HAS SPLITTER PLATES WOOO
also nighttime capabilities, nice :D
my only complain is that the canopy bow is only present for the WSO seat, which doesn't look very strong for a canopy at that time to handle more Gs
apart from that very epig
appearance review (yes I'm doing this for my own plane):
8/10
honestly was very happi with this design
everything was taken into consideration, although there are some things I'm a little unhappy about
that'll hopefully be fixed in the future :)
appearance review:
6/10
honestly, does not look very fun to fly, nor does it look appealing
aircraft looks unstable, and it doesn't look aerodynamic
nose cone looks too small for a radar
thin, delta wings suggests a supersonic trainer configuration, but since the aircraft doesn't look that aerodynamic, I doubt it can go past mach 1 (realistically)
engine config is... questionable
so is the main landing gear
however, this has potential
if it's redesigned with proper aeronautical engineering in mind, it has potential to be a great platform
I love delta wings. They're just, pog.
Oooh yeah oh. What we're livin in, lemme tell ya.
Yeah it's a wonder man can eat at all, when things are big that should be small.
Who can tell, what magic spells we'll be doing for us.
And I'm givin all my love to this world, only to be told:
"I can't see, I can't breathe",
no more will we be.
And nothing's gonna change the way we live.
Cause we can always take but never give,
and now that things are changing for the worse, see
Woaaaah!
It's a crazy world we're livin' in.
And I just can see that half of us immersed in sin is all we have to give this
Futures, made of, Virtual Insanity, now
Always, seem to, be governed by the love we have
For useless, twisting, our new technology, oh
Now there is no sound. For we all live underground!
if you have no motivation
Idfk, the question of whether you would quit or not completely depends on your ability to improvise and adapt
so no one can really control that except yourself
yoo pog
heya
+1@RepublicOfCursedPlanes
+3understandable have a great day
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes
here's what I have to say about your counterarguments:
I don't question the intake placement, but I question your control surfaces now what in the world
I have no comments for the last 2 points
other than that, you're welcome
appearance review:
8/10
attack.
that's it, this just screams that way.
wait I just realized
GLIDE BOOOOOOOOOOOOOMBS
appearance review:
+18/10
woaou
design looks very plausible for supersonic flight, albeit, just above transonic
looks somewhat maneuverable, but still looks like it has a positive stability design
that wingtip pylon does not look fine lmao
this looks very plausible for a 90s era jet
appearance review:
7/10
that moment when no radar.
why is the gun on the nose, a10 style
I mean, I would understand why if you used a rotary cannon but this is an autocannon, moreover single barreled
that, said nice design, very plausible for it's time
looks pretty maneuverable, and stable
kinda like the F-5
yeag
appearance review:
+15/10
for it's class, this definitely does not fit lmao :v
this is definitely a bomber, not an LCA
although, granted it only has 1 engine
atop of the tail
that's gonna be an issue, yikes
appearaance review:
8/10
I love this Imma be honest with you
chubby lil plane, perfect for attacking ground targets, vietnam style
very, very plausible design for a 70s aircraft, also looks very versatile
fuselage looks long enough, you can basically turn this thing into a supersonic aircraft by putting on afterburner engines like real
IT HAS SPLITTER PLATES WOOO
also nighttime capabilities, nice :D
my only complain is that the canopy bow is only present for the WSO seat, which doesn't look very strong for a canopy at that time to handle more Gs
apart from that very epig
appearance review (yes I'm doing this for my own plane):
8/10
honestly was very happi with this design
everything was taken into consideration, although there are some things I'm a little unhappy about
that'll hopefully be fixed in the future :)
appearance review:
6/10
honestly, does not look very fun to fly, nor does it look appealing
aircraft looks unstable, and it doesn't look aerodynamic
nose cone looks too small for a radar
thin, delta wings suggests a supersonic trainer configuration, but since the aircraft doesn't look that aerodynamic, I doubt it can go past mach 1 (realistically)
engine config is... questionable
so is the main landing gear
however, this has potential
if it's redesigned with proper aeronautical engineering in mind, it has potential to be a great platform
I love delta wings. They're just, pog.
gonna proceed to review the appearance of each aircraft cause I'm bored asf and I have no motivation to do anything
bru
@TheTomatoLover
+1good
@TheTomatoLover
pft
what in the world lmfao
I need to kill this other me where the fuck is he
@TheTomatoLover
the hell did I even say
@TheTomatoLover
seek a therapist, Idk
why would you dream about typing a whole ass essay, I wouldn't be reading shit
it depends on the part too
+1if the part is moveable, it will have more effect in performance cost than a fuselage block
4 spaces both front and back I believe
Idk
eepy
+1Oooh yeah oh. What we're livin in, lemme tell ya.
+1Yeah it's a wonder man can eat at all, when things are big that should be small.
Who can tell, what magic spells we'll be doing for us.
And I'm givin all my love to this world, only to be told:
"I can't see, I can't breathe",
no more will we be.
And nothing's gonna change the way we live.
Cause we can always take but never give,
and now that things are changing for the worse, see
Woaaaah!
It's a crazy world we're livin' in.
And I just can see that half of us immersed in sin is all we have to give this
Futures, made of, Virtual Insanity, now
Always, seem to, be governed by the love we have
For useless, twisting, our new technology, oh
Now there is no sound. For we all live underground!
@AlivePan
+1lmao
I mean if you say I won't judge, I will
everyone has opinion
I'm just not gonna elaborate it.
@TheTomatoLover
I will kill you. This is a (satirical) threat.
+3@TheTomatoLover
go away
felon
+4bottom text.
the hell is a compressor stall slat?
also finally someone who modeled the recoil of the gun
hi.
not fuckin bad.
somehow hits home of my own building styles.
@TheTomatoLover
I am sure
@TheTomatoLover
I was not
never was
@OMGPppo
Something to do with the airbrakes, I guess.
@TheTomatoLover
no
if you have no motivation
+1Idfk, the question of whether you would quit or not completely depends on your ability to improvise and adapt
so no one can really control that except yourself
seriously, have people checked pinned forum posts
skill issue
is this a list of everyone on the site lmfao
kil
kil
how much people check their jet streams again
beacon.xml
input set to
FireWeaponsthat's it
controversial topic
no comment
tournaments no longer exists man
+2@14FanFlight
sure
be sure to credit (just keeping the auto credit is fine)
based
@32
I'm not gonna sugarcoat it
looks like I have another fictional aircraft idea lol
now the challenge is imagining how this would actually look without the blocky parts.
+1@ShinyGemsBro
real
@14FanFlight
It's exactly what the aircraft is based off of. I mixed in some elements of the T-7 and the F/A-18 together.
@PriusCat
Oh, thanks for pointing that out! Guess I should fix it.