i dont wanna be that guy but i just feel that it has to be mentioned that it is "challenge" not "challange"
.
ANYWAY!!! the challenge looks cool, i might join it and i actually have a couple unposted builds that already qualify but i think it would be more fun if i made something new
very good F-5E, especially for the part count, the shape of it is better than most. there are few issues regarding the flight model, as it retains energy alot more than the actual f-5, but that might just be preference so idk. one thing that i think could be fixed though is the roll rate, the f-5 rolls fast enough to the point that a full-deflection aileron roll could structurally damage the airplane (a spring stop was put in the stick to prevent accidental full deflection)
my favorite thing about this build has to be the part count, it is VERY low for something with a livery and custom wings, so good job
You have possibly the best made cockpit in simpleplanes, I just have to say. the whole thing is very impressive for the attention to detail and the obvious effort, very nice. I do appreciate the build for that, but as an F-5E-3, it is not as close as you can get to real life or DCS.
.
My main gripe with it is the completely lifeless flight model. It looks like it flies pretty close to the graphs, I haven't actually tested it but it seems about right. The issue is the feel, it just isn't there, the fbw and flight modeling funky trees doesn't replicate the F-5 in any way or even any 3rd generation fighter.
.
There are other inaccuracies in your F-5E-3 that I can see but most of them are pretty minor and i don't want to seem annoying by listing every little error you made.
@Leehopard another reason (i think) for the lag is the sheer amount of moving parts, its meant to be blown up so its all segmented with detachers and rotators. in my experience more moving objects also lag more.
.
i should probably make the controls simpler by using a gyro possibly
it possible yeah but i wouldnt do em like this
.
i do want to eventually make "tv" and "laser" guided weapons though im not actually sure how i would implement them yet.
this would be very limited for tv guided weapons because you wouldnt be able to actually slew the designator.
.
currently the most "realistic" form is using another camera view and slewing a designator to aim where the camera points. it would work well but using it requires you to select another camera instead of controlling it in the cockpit.
.
@develrprs plese add tv part to game!!!!
number three is false
+4@KnightOfRen MiG 31 great plane but your is kinda ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
+4who tf cares about flight characteristics, make a super flashy thumbnail and make the build 1000+ parts for easy upvotes
+4- no, realisitic water is pretty hard to do and would make it hard for people with lower end devices to play
- maybe.
- lol no
- kinda useless
+4is this anyone elses religion
+4funny joke, can't wait for angry weeb to come storming here and complaining for some reason
+4ok buddy no problem, atleast you didn't try to defend yourself when you were clearly wrong
+4throttle up very slowly
+4alright so the war has moved over here! if you don't like this build please let me take your salt
+4alright so I found some:
+4.
Guardian:
15000.
Interceptor:
20000.
Inferno:
15000.
Cleaver:
idkbepis man
+4lmao that ending
+4i repord plain i don liek becuz my opion is wright
+4@FishMiner will 84 boom 50's do?
+4can't wait for the huge argument on a piece of metal grabs popcorn
+4bes p-51 on da sp
+4no need to prove that idiots can reach platinum lol
+3i dont wanna be that guy but i just feel that it has to be mentioned that it is "challenge" not "challange"
+3.
ANYWAY!!! the challenge looks cool, i might join it and i actually have a couple unposted builds that already qualify but i think it would be more fun if i made something new
its just like the flanker from digital combat simulator world
+3tank is truth !!!
+3spam (real)
+3chiken nugetes
+3you have been FIRED from simpleplanes!!!!
+3its clearly a tank you should know this already
+3cool sponsors
+3the t-38 is its own thing !!!! its not a modified f-5b
+3ok
+3this has the worst control scheme for an airplane that i have ever seen, please do not ever do this ever again, i love it
+3very good F-5E, especially for the part count, the shape of it is better than most. there are few issues regarding the flight model, as it retains energy alot more than the actual f-5, but that might just be preference so idk. one thing that i think could be fixed though is the roll rate, the f-5 rolls fast enough to the point that a full-deflection aileron roll could structurally damage the airplane (a spring stop was put in the stick to prevent accidental full deflection)
+3my favorite thing about this build has to be the part count, it is VERY low for something with a livery and custom wings, so good job
i put her in the middle of the runway and she almost got run over by an ai plane, 10/10 one of the sp builds ever
+3wow ummmmmmmm
+3CW-19
+3@MrSilverWolf my f5 can INERTIAL SEPARATE your caravan into a million pieces
+3@MrSilverWolf just because your STUPID caravan doesnt have auxilary intakes doest mean you get to make fun of them!!!!!!!!!
+3@AlivePan im not a ddo doo hed :((((((((((((((
+3You have possibly the best made cockpit in simpleplanes, I just have to say. the whole thing is very impressive for the attention to detail and the obvious effort, very nice. I do appreciate the build for that, but as an F-5E-3, it is not as close as you can get to real life or DCS.
+3.
My main gripe with it is the completely lifeless flight model. It looks like it flies pretty close to the graphs, I haven't actually tested it but it seems about right. The issue is the feel, it just isn't there, the fbw and flight modeling funky trees doesn't replicate the F-5 in any way or even any 3rd generation fighter.
.
There are other inaccuracies in your F-5E-3 that I can see but most of them are pretty minor and i don't want to seem annoying by listing every little error you made.
@Robomo119DerMustangKiller black guy with thunderstorm in the background
+3tern cocaine
+3@Jaspy190 fight me outside with your beyblade!!!
+3@Leehopard another reason (i think) for the lag is the sheer amount of moving parts, its meant to be blown up so its all segmented with detachers and rotators. in my experience more moving objects also lag more.
+3.
i should probably make the controls simpler by using a gyro possibly
bean ng
+3blue sidewinders are inert and for practice
+3fake
+3dont make forum posts about verifpro anymore !!!!!!!!! (except me)
+3f-106 viper
+3@MrSilverWolf no more sipleplanes premium account
+3it possible yeah but i wouldnt do em like this
+3.
i do want to eventually make "tv" and "laser" guided weapons though im not actually sure how i would implement them yet.
this would be very limited for tv guided weapons because you wouldnt be able to actually slew the designator.
.
currently the most "realistic" form is using another camera view and slewing a designator to aim where the camera points. it would work well but using it requires you to select another camera instead of controlling it in the cockpit.
.
@develrprs plese add tv part to game!!!!
i really want to make a video of this thing in action but sp levels are kinda garbage
+3SPAOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
+3