When i do bother, i wing it, usually have AG group buttons to the left, I like the fighter throttle to the left, joystick to the right, then some sorta screen dead ahead, any 'emergency' buttons by the feet. Needless to say, I have not really ever looked at a plane cockpit
@Graingy not 100% sure, but if its anything like most calculators, its approximated to a bunch of decimal places. but it might make some rounding easier somewhere, any benefits are probably undercut though, by its long size
Birds are an amazing shout, if they do a minimap I reckon it'll be a "screen" part or something like that, im slightly worried they might not add stuff like that because people managed to make it with normal stuff though. The Ai needs a uniform improvement too
@Graingy if you are using the *11.111 one, if you want higher resolution (more decimal places) use 100/9. If you struggle with label stuff, i got examples you can take if you need
@Graingy Dont be, thats just good coding, there are usually 100 ways to achieve the same thing, that said, there will be one optimal one. I know for the invis label that it does work. as for the Throttle thing, Im pretty sure it would work, but that s mainly if I understood what you wanted
@Graingy change the opacity value e.g. colour = colourHex{TargetSelected>0? 00 : FF} make sure to put speech marks around the ff and 00, it wont format right here for sm reason
and as for the throttle you could do it with round(clamp01(Throttle-0.91)*100/9) would show what i think you want, such that it shows the percentage after 91% and treat that 9% as 0-100%
1, ig is cool, but would kinda void the whole you can only take in studio screenshots thing the devs havent really changed since day 1.
2. Nah. Its useful to be able to see changed names. I disappear for 2 years, come back, dont know anyone new and anyone old 90% odds changed their name
the uss beast is big ik, but compared to acc modelled planes its pretty good for larger builds, i think maybe there should just be more varied sizes of carriers
back like 8 years ago when I used to watch jelly, i distinctly remember being down a sandbox rabbit hole, scrap mechanic, ksp, sp and i chose simple planes, no regrets
also 'old players' can have been around for up to 10 years, so for most people starting in teenage years, are now full legal adults with jobs/studying with responsibilities
easy, make a plane
@Graingy I uh-, I was in a dark place- I swear I didn’t mean it
@LunarEclipseSP damn, really? I never keep up w the drama
+1damn. may have been a bit too gooner-y, but still a skilled creator gone. Sad regardless
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 right, sure I’ll fix that rn should work now
@Graingy wh- No, I can explain- it’s not what it looks like
Here
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 the formatting is messed up. I will put in a google doc and link the code w explanation
icl scalene triangle on top
+1real sp fans start on the kraken
Much better than graingys pfp
@Monarchii hmmmm krakatoa ig
bandit for simple testing, wright for weapons testing, skypark for land vehicles
dope.
When i do bother, i wing it, usually have AG group buttons to the left, I like the fighter throttle to the left, joystick to the right, then some sorta screen dead ahead, any 'emergency' buttons by the feet. Needless to say, I have not really ever looked at a plane cockpit
+1@Graingy congrats on a new combination of words
@Graingy just think early 2000’s/90’s comedically over detailed web pages/apps
@factpoultry I do need to actually do camo, it would be a first for me, I’ll see, if it turns out ok it’ll get posted with the rest
+1@SILVERPANZER a tank will be made, not to your high levels of quality. But it will be done
+1@Graingy don't be close minded, true art may seem contradictory, I believe in you
@Graingy add some flames, a realistic plane, etc
+1Too minimalist, needs more detail
+1@StinkyRice it was? damn, thats a shame
@Graingy not 100% sure, but if its anything like most calculators, its approximated to a bunch of decimal places. but it might make some rounding easier somewhere, any benefits are probably undercut though, by its long size
@Graingy a fraction makes it so you never rounded. 11.111. Is slightly less than the true value, it’s up to you
Birds are an amazing shout, if they do a minimap I reckon it'll be a "screen" part or something like that, im slightly worried they might not add stuff like that because people managed to make it with normal stuff though. The Ai needs a uniform improvement too
+1@shipster physics, which should be helpful for thiss website lol
@Graingy if you are using the *11.111 one, if you want higher resolution (more decimal places) use 100/9. If you struggle with label stuff, i got examples you can take if you need
@winterro YES, and like a better magnet, which I will dub an attacher, that acc fixes things together rigidly
+1@Graingy Dont be, thats just good coding, there are usually 100 ways to achieve the same thing, that said, there will be one optimal one. I know for the invis label that it does work. as for the Throttle thing, Im pretty sure it would work, but that s mainly if I understood what you wanted
@Graingy change the opacity value e.g.
colour = colourHex{TargetSelected>0? 00 : FF}make sure to put speech marks around the ff and 00, it wont format right here for sm reasonand as for the throttle you could do it with
round(clamp01(Throttle-0.91)*100/9)would show what i think you want, such that it shows the percentage after 91% and treat that 9% as 0-100%Page d'album is up there, but i gotta rate moonlight sonata higher
lol
+1Fair enough, come back when you wanna build again, or for sp2
+1my dumb ah thought u were a god with labels icl
you wanna build stuff? come back. You dont wanna build stuff? dont, theres no stress
Gotta start building watermarks
+6resizing rotators for like vents, or overlapping smoothed fuselage to make it look like musculature
1, ig is cool, but would kinda void the whole you can only take in studio screenshots thing the devs havent really changed since day 1.
2. Nah. Its useful to be able to see changed names. I disappear for 2 years, come back, dont know anyone new and anyone old 90% odds changed their name
HOLY THIS IS COOL, i tried something like this w zero success years ago, this is insane
+1Tonight on bottom gear
niceeeee
+1GOJO
the uss beast is big ik, but compared to acc modelled planes its pretty good for larger builds, i think maybe there should just be more varied sizes of carriers
Wobuffet
+1what phone are you using, this said, i personally didnt have huge issues using overload on ios
+1good job
+1v nice
back like 8 years ago when I used to watch jelly, i distinctly remember being down a sandbox rabbit hole, scrap mechanic, ksp, sp and i chose simple planes, no regrets
+1also 'old players' can have been around for up to 10 years, so for most people starting in teenage years, are now full legal adults with jobs/studying with responsibilities