I just need the cannons in an easier to install form, like just the mechanism. And it’s no problem if it takes a while, the project is no where near finished
Due to the fact it was a top secret project and there aren’t that many around, I’m not surprised. And I didn’t remember that YF-12 you made, my bad @SledDriver
I agree, but I think it wont be added because it "takes away creativity," or something like that. It would allow for much more detailed planes without the high part count. For example, take @jamesPLANESii 's recent Freedom Fox. Its a great plane and I love everything about it, but with a decal system like you're suggesting, it's 3338 part count could be reduced too about 500. Airliners, warbirds, cars, helicopters, and so many more creations would benefit from this. Besides, interiors and cockpits would also be greatly improved by this. @AndrewGarrison I know me and several other users have asked for this, but it would mean a lot if it were to be taken into consideration.
Oh and sorry James for tagging you, but your opinion would be nice, even though this isn't my forum. But hey, your plane gets a shoutout :P
You're on windows, so I assume you have a keyboard. If you do, click the ~ or ` key, it bings up a bar you can type in. Put //MainCamera>Camera.setFieldOfView 75 and then //CameraPlane>Camera.setFieldOfView 75 in. It doesn't need to be 75, just play around with it. I found those "cheats" on jamesPLANESii's Freedom Fox, so ask him for more details @belugasub
Just because it’s more modern doesn’t mean it has to be bigger. Airlines are shifting over to smaller, more efficient, and most importantly cheaper to maintain planes. This saves money and is more practical in the long run. This is why the 747 is being retired, it’s just too expensive and not that practical. Planes like the 787 can do the same flights for half the cost.
Vonhubert was the first though
+1Then the 4th type: don’t upvote anything because of laziness @JamesBoA
+2Noice!
@Chancey21
oh its no problem @asteroidbook345
Lol, can you do it? @asteroidbook345
Awesome!
But it flops around when pitching and makes flying unenjoyable @Leehopard
+4Oh @FairFireFight
Awesome!
Looks good, flies poorly
I just need the cannons in an easier to install form, like just the mechanism. And it’s no problem if it takes a while, the project is no where near finished
Could you make the two cannons but just the bare minimum please? Also disabled aircraft collision too if thats ok?
They do, its called landing on wet runways lol
+1Noice!
BogdanX for his inovative ways to reduce part count, and for his dedication to realism
+2Due to the fact it was a top secret project and there aren’t that many around, I’m not surprised. And I didn’t remember that YF-12 you made, my bad @SledDriver
Awesome, thanks for the engine fact, I didn’t know that. Maybe try the YF-12, it’s quite similar but looks cooler
That’s one hell of a plane! I can’t wait to try it out
+1Thank you very much! I'm putting it into a tank, so thats why it needs to have no collision @hanleehan03
I know I already said this, but good luck! I can’t wait to see that replica
+2I might play around with it, no promises though
Awesome! One of my favorite planes!
Lookin good!
Awesome! Could you make it disabled aircraft collision please?
Happy birthday!
+1Maybe sometime @Fartspoppop
Haha :P @SledDriver
I don’t know how I would do it, but I was thinking a yellow stripe between the black and the grey @SledDriver
Very nice!
Nice! For your next build, I suggest putting a touch of yellow in, mixed with the black and grey. I think it will look really cool and help it pop
I’ve never lost so much faith in humanity in so little time
+2Get the GAU Avenger
YES!!!
Nice!
+1Na this is a B-17 lol
+6Besides, It would have been easier to go to the moon than to fake it @metallicplanes
+1You're not just wrong, you're stupid.
+4I’m in! I started a tank but never finished it, so here I go! Does a Flakpanzer count though?
I agree, but I think it wont be added because it "takes away creativity," or something like that. It would allow for much more detailed planes without the high part count. For example, take @jamesPLANESii 's recent Freedom Fox. Its a great plane and I love everything about it, but with a decal system like you're suggesting, it's 3338 part count could be reduced too about 500. Airliners, warbirds, cars, helicopters, and so many more creations would benefit from this. Besides, interiors and cockpits would also be greatly improved by this. @AndrewGarrison I know me and several other users have asked for this, but it would mean a lot if it were to be taken into consideration.
Oh and sorry James for tagging you, but your opinion would be nice, even though this isn't my forum. But hey, your plane gets a shoutout :P
+4That looks awesome! I’d be glad to test it out if you need, just offering lol. Also, how do you do the image effects on the first screen shot?
Nice! I’ve actually been thinking about how to do this, but you provided me the answer!
Awesome!
I speak very little, I take it for school. I haven’t spoke any in a while
Cool! I like the conbination of all the planes
No problem! Its quite simple, and it gets rid of the "FreeCam is on" message. Also, 60 is the default FOV @belugasub
You're on windows, so I assume you have a keyboard. If you do, click the ~ or ` key, it bings up a bar you can type in. Put //MainCamera>Camera.setFieldOfView 75 and then //CameraPlane>Camera.setFieldOfView 75 in. It doesn't need to be 75, just play around with it. I found those "cheats" on jamesPLANESii's Freedom Fox, so ask him for more details @belugasub
Nice!
Just because it’s more modern doesn’t mean it has to be bigger. Airlines are shifting over to smaller, more efficient, and most importantly cheaper to maintain planes. This saves money and is more practical in the long run. This is why the 747 is being retired, it’s just too expensive and not that practical. Planes like the 787 can do the same flights for half the cost.
+1Awesome! Looks Russian, probably because it is lol