Something seems to be broken. When I spawn this in, it begins to do non-stop uncontrollable cricles and I cannot correct this nor control the vehicle in any way.
@Chancey21 I believe it has something to do with the rather questionable engine performances of SP propeller aircraft (You know what i'm talking about, point the plane straight up and the engine is strong enough that you don't actually stall.) Also, most planes, due to said strangeness, act unpredictably and unrealistically when trying to use a control surface (In this case, the elevator) in abrupt manners. Basically, controls dont seem to suffer from compression at high speeds or stiffen up at lower ones. That, combined with the strangeness of propellers, makes for odd landings when attempting untraditional methods. (Though I find three point landings are still possible if you go light on controls.)
I am also starting a new account because a lot of my older designs were primarily improvements on other people’s builds, and i’m not proud of that. @BlueCitrus
Then what puzzles me is why a Tiger? Those things werent exactly pouring off the assembly line, a Panzer III or IV would be much more convenient wouldn't it?@StallFlight
I do think the Tiger was superior to the Churchills, but not vastly, and such few were built that it didn't even make a noticeable impact in the war @metallicplanes
Without a doubt, I completely agree. The Churchills had comparable armor and in some places even stronger armor earlier in the war, and were significantly more effective and common than Panzer VIs @metallicplanes
Something seems to be broken. When I spawn this in, it begins to do non-stop uncontrollable cricles and I cannot correct this nor control the vehicle in any way.
+7Lol @sheepsblood @Strikefighter04
+3Haha people are actually trying to find the slope and intercepts of this, I'm greatly amused XD
+3I SAWED THIS FLEX TAPE IN HALF
+3WHO KNEW BLITZKRIEG COULD BE SO SLOW
+3@Chancey21 I believe it has something to do with the rather questionable engine performances of SP propeller aircraft (You know what i'm talking about, point the plane straight up and the engine is strong enough that you don't actually stall.) Also, most planes, due to said strangeness, act unpredictably and unrealistically when trying to use a control surface (In this case, the elevator) in abrupt manners. Basically, controls dont seem to suffer from compression at high speeds or stiffen up at lower ones. That, combined with the strangeness of propellers, makes for odd landings when attempting untraditional methods. (Though I find three point landings are still possible if you go light on controls.)
+2*Glances at part count.
ONE DAY BILLY, ONE DAY
+2It would be great if you could make a version with just a standard wing gun instead of the modded 120mm so that way mobile users can download this
+2Meep meep
+1No problem! @Zott
+1Woah, this first post is better than some platinum users work. You sir, deserve this spotlight and updoot more than anyone.
+1Hurmm...Suspicious.
+1See kids, this is what happens when you dont eat your apple slices and milk.
+1WOOO DOGGAHY
+1Cute little model :)
+1Now you too can fantasize about a gaming console within a game!
+1Yess!! Finally, a dc-10 lookalike that looks great and is mobile friendly!!
+1Ooh, sneaky how you incorporated that sneak peek at the mig-9 Heheh.
+1Something tells me this is gonna give mobile users a punch to the gut lol.
+1Lol, thanks for the updoot anyway@jamesPLANESii
+1Wow this turned into my most popular plane in less than 10 minutes! Now what to build next...
+1Huh, cute. Is it just me or does the 40mm do the same damage as the stock?
+1Heres an image: http://luftwaffeprofile.blogspot.com/p/jg53-friedrich-profiles.html. The pilot was Gunther Fronhofer@TheGuyYouMightKnow
+1Aww issocute!
+1Amazing drone!! A couple of suggestions: Make it shoot guardian missles as well as the interceptors :>
+1@HeatedWafflez lol same here
+1Have at it! @CaptaincarrocaBR
Lol, thanks for the upvote @PhantomBladeCorp
Thanks @belugasub
I am also starting a new account because a lot of my older designs were primarily improvements on other people’s builds, and i’m not proud of that. @BlueCitrus
Interesting. Quite a typical death too hehehe
Well the Germans sure loved their cats ¯_(ツ)_/¯ @StallFlight
Then what puzzles me is why a Tiger? Those things werent exactly pouring off the assembly line, a Panzer III or IV would be much more convenient wouldn't it?@StallFlight
Seems odd that they would choose to remove the gun, since this looks like something you'd use to recover a vehicle under fire.
Wow, I was expecting severely more parts than this, great job!
Np @D0M1N420R
You can only spotlight posts if you have more points than the guy who made the post, I appreciate the gesture though! @metallicplanes
This is amazing!
Thank you for the spotlights! @CRJ900Pilot @Frenchyfry @Tang0five @Hawkeye156 @Simplemike it means a lot to me :)
These guns have always felt like high-caliber machineguns to me lol, super speedy reload and hardly any damage per shot @Frenchyfry
I haven't seen any gameplay of it since the AP spalling buff, does the gun actually destroy multiple modules per shot now? @Frenchyfry
I do think the Tiger was superior to the Churchills, but not vastly, and such few were built that it didn't even make a noticeable impact in the war @metallicplanes
Without a doubt, I completely agree. The Churchills had comparable armor and in some places even stronger armor earlier in the war, and were significantly more effective and common than Panzer VIs @metallicplanes
Certainly, lol. Then again the Tiger’s armor is really overrated, a 47mm shell could penetrate the side no problem below 500m @metallicplanes
I thought it was 110? @metallicplanes
Thank you for the upvotes! @USSR @Simplemike @D0M1N420R @Mobius1Cyka @SakuraSaku @Saturnite @WaffleCakes @AI011001 @ PINGASMACHINE @CRJ900Pilot
Thanks! @CRJ900Pilot
Nice!
Thanks Dom :> @D0M1N420R
I’ll just spotlight the hell out of everything you post lol @D0M1N420R