Looks too small. I thought the name sky wagon indicated something sizeable in the 6-8 seater range. The word wagon almost like caravan and a Cessna Grand Caravan, well, that's big.
@MrCOPTY If u wanna be so exact, 27k/f^2 or 27lb/f^2 (ik, there's a big difference between lbs and kilos, but I can't remember the unit. but probably lbs since it's f^2) if I recall correctly, is the average 109's wing loading ; )
I would love to use this on a TD. But the credit is mandatory part is hilarious tho understandable. And heavy part count isn't 87 parts, at least not in a tank.
@Potatz Heh. This is part of a WIP project I may abondon. But I'll think about adding spaced if I continue it. Mostly, this is a technique demonstrator
Anyway, I use upvotes as a meter to see how much people like my builds so I can improve as well as see patterns in what people like (such as unique looking tanks)
@X4JB I'm building a tank that you'll probably disagree with a lot this time, but I'm building it for fun with a hint of realism. BTW, could u check out my most recent tank the AGSRV MA? Ur reviews help a lot.
@Darkhound Brain explosion but yeah. However, Its not necessarily true. I have an in progress prototype that won't fly unless the CoL is in front of the CoM by about .4 SP units. Possibly it may be due to the way the engines are mounted, but so far during testing, it's actually quiet maneuverable and stable.
@LITVYAK013INDUSTRIES Well, on airplanes, it depends. But its not really neccessary on airplanes. Stability wise for planes, the mechanics work differently
This post has some things that might help. XML overload mod will be helpful/
+1well... u could resize cleaver missiles, reduce explosionScale, and things like that
+1@GianDaSky Nice nice, try making a cast turret sometime ; )
+2@ReinMcDeer @MrSilverWolf Yeah, I was just wondering haha
cool, exterior is a little blocky, but interior is tough to do, nice work.
T
Awww... no unmodern tanks...
+1Looks too small. I thought the name sky wagon indicated something sizeable in the 6-8 seater range. The word wagon almost like caravan and a Cessna Grand Caravan, well, that's big.
@MrCOPTY If u wanna be so exact, 27k/f^2 or 27lb/f^2 (ik, there's a big difference between lbs and kilos, but I can't remember the unit. but probably lbs since it's f^2) if I recall correctly, is the average 109's wing loading ; )
Looks like a japanese superheavy
I dislike anime, but this is tough to build so I respect that. Also, nice features.
+6@SpiritusRaptor YEET only 2 guns
+15924 PARTS????!!!!
+1@SpiritusRaptor YOU ARE BACK!!!
Can be used on phone... not XD
You know, Yoh's are the best tanks to build
What about build the new possible Italian TD's from World of Tanks? @RussianAce
+1How do u make that muzzle brake. This tank is awesome
+1@X99STRIKER @xNotDumb @Timplanes @ZeroWithSlashedO @Croissant @2Papi2Chulo @Inuyasha8215 @Bryan5 @V Bruh, none of these answers helped much XD.
Is curator even a role/rank on simpleplanes.com?
+1@RussianAce Nevermind
The best funkyboat ever I seen. I'd play this in any warship game
+3Cringe... I usually support your posts wholeheartedly, but this...
+4@Bobyo It's much simpler to make muzzle brakes since the updates. A muzzle brake used to be oh... up to 30 parts or so. Now, 10 or less.
+3Nice little, I dunno what to call it haha. It's cute and powerful.
+4I would love to use this on a TD. But the credit is mandatory part is hilarious tho understandable. And heavy part count isn't 87 parts, at least not in a tank.
Not bad. Very nice 50B
The turret would look nicer if you followed this shaping technique
But very nice job!
Nice! Finally, the E.50 I always wanted
+1@NCorp Heart of Courage. Took me forever to find that song when I first heard it (5 years)
+1@Potatz Heh. This is part of a WIP project I may abondon. But I'll think about adding spaced if I continue it. Mostly, this is a technique demonstrator
+1@Potatz Hmmm... well most basic russian turrets din't have spaced armor. Besides, the dome shape makes it theortecially very strong
+1Finally, u built a "correct" E.100! Thank you!
+2my this is smoooff
Get this post out there, everyone needs to see it.
Anyway, I use upvotes as a meter to see how much people like my builds so I can improve as well as see patterns in what people like (such as unique looking tanks)
@BellKitsu Rex is joking...
Wow... I'm actually stunned lol.
Besides, yoh tanks were supposedly considered irl
@X4JB I'm building a tank that you'll probably disagree with a lot this time, but I'm building it for fun with a hint of realism. BTW, could u check out my most recent tank the AGSRV MA? Ur reviews help a lot.
Finally on our way to SP in SP!
+2I shall never use 2d rivets in my tanks >:)
thanks @DJ2keroni. I'm finally closing in on your points. Then I can spotlight u again XD.
@LittleJerry XD
@LittleJerry You?
Who took the pics. I want to ask for his help when I upload.
+1@Mainthedevil Yup! Just make sure to successor it.
@Darkhound Brain explosion but yeah. However, Its not necessarily true. I have an in progress prototype that won't fly unless the CoL is in front of the CoM by about .4 SP units. Possibly it may be due to the way the engines are mounted, but so far during testing, it's actually quiet maneuverable and stable.
@LieutenantSOT @PapaKernels @WisconsinStatePolice
+2@DumbPlaneMaker Actually it doesn't
+1@LITVYAK013INDUSTRIES no problem
@LITVYAK013INDUSTRIES Well, on airplanes, it depends. But its not really neccessary on airplanes. Stability wise for planes, the mechanics work differently
+1