Honestly, I am kind of disappointed on how you manage to shut this down for like, what is it? 5 days interval after significant action? We’ve yet to see other vehicles in use, but at least wait for longer for others to eventually submit more designs needed to fill in missing vehicle types and get some other people to join in.
At least I waited for status reports of another challenge I joined back in like what’s it, 2.7 years? Even then it took weeks for some challenge’s status update to come out but that challenge itself is a different story and at a different time.
I wonder when someone will pass on the continuation of this challenge, when at a time a bunch are already busy with uni/college stuff?
On another note, since there are already a few transport designs of us peacekeepers, I suggest there needs to be more transport vehicles, but I also propose a stance where ANY ATTEMPT TO SEND PAYMENTS TO THE TERRORISTS should be forbidden.
I've once tried to place a remote machine gun system ahead of the dismount compartment but the mount cannot depress the gun very well when aiming to the rear. I'd decided it would be more suited as a mere 'battle taxi' without initial standalone machine gun systems.
I cannot provide an APC yet. I also cannot provide a supply truck or a mobile bridge either. But it would be quite nice if somebody is able to send them an affordable humvee-like vehicle.
Also I am concerned that there is a lack of custom naval (sea) vehicle/vessel submissions that are not any naval aircraft or flying boats in this challenge. And almost or at least all of the submissions are entirely aircraft, excluding the ground SPAA that we apparently have.
So here's a specification requirement for an anti-air patrol frigate or destroyer:
The Maximum Displacement must be 5,000 t but must not be lesser than 1,340 t, The max speed that the craft can go is at 32 knots minimum target. It must be equipped with an effective radar equivalent to or greater to that of Snowstone's most effective radar available. Sonar must also be included. It must be armed with a comprehensive armament of at least 3 CIW Systems of the same caliber (No mixed calibers to simplify logistics), a main gun no lesser than 76mm nor greater than 8-inch (203.2mm) that must be able to have an effective accuracy equal to the 76mm gun of OTO Melara (Or just fit the ship with it), and it must at least have 20 Medium Range SAM's in store with at least a missile launcher system that allows those missiles to be launched from. Other missiles (inluding said med-range SAM's) can also be included on whatever is necessary.
Well, considering the situation going on right now, should I suggest we remain in a neutral stance and allow Snowstone to go on a fool around find out approach while we plan on further training and development of more effective early warning and detection technologies? Should I also suggest putting up a more effective defensive stance aimed at killing off more snowstone assets as possible when they are on offensives while reducing as much Wright casualties as possible?
Now, I've been thinking about often overestimating the enemy. What if Snowstone's Soviet aircrafts look old but had seemingly modernized versions of their own? What if Snowstone had already mass produced or still producing UGPN's? Covertly had unlicensed copies of MiG-25's that actually performs what the Americans feared (Being way more agile than what it seems, etc.)?
Really, think what the enemy might have as they can be producing weapons of war that are far superior versions than what we would otherwise expect. I'd reckon they even have the time to build a time machine in our one of the worse case scenarios possible.
Omenia threatens the use of nuclear weapons against Union and Estovian fleets as anti-nuclear and nuclear batteries are put up by Omenia near member states of the Union. Union retaliates by deploying its own nuclear capable bombers as tensions in the main continent return to what it was 15 years ago.
Oh damn, just about time while I was slowly making an AEW aircraft converted from a turboprop transport for the Union.
Check my most recent comment in this challenge page. In other words: Is any work within SimplePlanes only allowed for this challenge and not on other games?
Wait, are we allowed to post images of our builds from other games in this comment section but still influences the overall situation of the conflict, in this challenge? (Example: An image of some warship built in UA:D or NavalArt, An image of a tank built in Sprocket TD, etc?)
~~BAGONG CLASS NG MARITIME PATROL VESSEL TO SUPPLEMENT VARIOUS BARKONGS REPUBLIKA NG PILIPINAS AT TSAKA DUTERTE-CLASS NG SUPERCARRIERS AT IBANG BARKONG NG PANGINGISDA~~
I got finals to do, and unfortunately it's neither physical sciences or maths. Although I might consider taking interest in this challenge, if I had given a higher free time priority to SP
Now plan a video of drifting in the same three games.
+1Sipping water
Honestly, I am kind of disappointed on how you manage to shut this down for like, what is it? 5 days interval after significant action? We’ve yet to see other vehicles in use, but at least wait for longer for others to eventually submit more designs needed to fill in missing vehicle types and get some other people to join in.
At least I waited for status reports of another challenge I joined back in like what’s it, 2.7 years? Even then it took weeks for some challenge’s status update to come out but that challenge itself is a different story and at a different time.
+1I wonder when someone will pass on the continuation of this challenge, when at a time a bunch are already busy with uni/college stuff?
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes
You forgot to mention the variety of vanilla weaponry, basic aerial warfare and non-electric prop engines involved in SP.
@Aarav The ‘do-17’ is a BMW 801-powered Night Fighter variant of the Do 217.
Twin-Engined Aircraft that sometimes took on the roles of interceptor or night fighter: ‘Allow us to introduce ourselves.’
On another note, since there are already a few transport designs of us peacekeepers, I suggest there needs to be more transport vehicles, but I also propose a stance where ANY ATTEMPT TO SEND PAYMENTS TO THE TERRORISTS should be forbidden.
+1@Hiimakeplanes
In my opinion, it's best to just sell it to some backwards nation. We might as well wait for other's responses.
@Yourlocalhuman
I've once tried to place a remote machine gun system ahead of the dismount compartment but the mount cannot depress the gun very well when aiming to the rear. I'd decided it would be more suited as a mere 'battle taxi' without initial standalone machine gun systems.
+1APC built
I cannot provide an APC yet. I also cannot provide a supply truck or a mobile bridge either. But it would be quite nice if somebody is able to send them an affordable humvee-like vehicle.
Built some ambulance based on the AC-58, with an extra pair of wheels on the ground
We might need a few armored or field ambulance designs. Prob help out some wounded.
@U2
I remember having steam work with windows 8.1 on another computer. I don't know how you managed to think of that.
@U2
You can't just simply say a few words just for me to become convinced, at least back it up with some sources.
@U2
Expand on that
@U2
I am hooked with what you just said. Mind to bring up more about that matter? I am concerned.
ok
canard triplane
Also I am concerned that there is a lack of custom naval (sea) vehicle/vessel submissions that are not any naval aircraft or flying boats in this challenge. And almost or at least all of the submissions are entirely aircraft, excluding the ground SPAA that we apparently have.
So here's a specification requirement for an anti-air patrol frigate or destroyer:
The Maximum Displacement must be 5,000 t but must not be lesser than 1,340 t, The max speed that the craft can go is at 32 knots minimum target. It must be equipped with an effective radar equivalent to or greater to that of Snowstone's most effective radar available. Sonar must also be included. It must be armed with a comprehensive armament of at least 3 CIW Systems of the same caliber (No mixed calibers to simplify logistics), a main gun no lesser than 76mm nor greater than 8-inch (203.2mm) that must be able to have an effective accuracy equal to the 76mm gun of OTO Melara (Or just fit the ship with it), and it must at least have 20 Medium Range SAM's in store with at least a missile launcher system that allows those missiles to be launched from. Other missiles (inluding said med-range SAM's) can also be included on whatever is necessary.
@Yourlocalhuman
What. This is a bit incomprehensible.
Well, considering the situation going on right now, should I suggest we remain in a neutral stance and allow Snowstone to go on a fool around find out approach while we plan on further training and development of more effective early warning and detection technologies? Should I also suggest putting up a more effective defensive stance aimed at killing off more snowstone assets as possible when they are on offensives while reducing as much Wright casualties as possible?
@Yourlocalhuman
That pinned comment has been 6 days ago.
However, do not enact the decision now. We have to wait for other people's decisions and votes.
@Yourlocalhuman
I'd suggest we keep ourselves neutral for now. Can't risk making this war turn into a proxy war with 2 superpowers. Wait and see what will happen.
I do not doubt that Snowstone conducts espionage on this comment section or on other media as they become more aware.
Now, I've been thinking about often overestimating the enemy. What if Snowstone's Soviet aircrafts look old but had seemingly modernized versions of their own? What if Snowstone had already mass produced or still producing UGPN's? Covertly had unlicensed copies of MiG-25's that actually performs what the Americans feared (Being way more agile than what it seems, etc.)?
+1Really, think what the enemy might have as they can be producing weapons of war that are far superior versions than what we would otherwise expect. I'd reckon they even have the time to build a time machine in our one of the worse case scenarios possible.
EYY! The Union must prepare a nuclear triad at this point again.
Commissioned an AEW aircraft for the Union
Was about to comment on recommending 20-character long passwords but I had to login again after attempting comment submitting
+3@PlaneFlightX
Would long passwords work perhaps?
+3The hard to access legacy propeller blocks nowadays.
+3Oh damn, just about time while I was slowly making an AEW aircraft converted from a turboprop transport for the Union.
Somebody working for the Union, commission such electronic aircraft for the UFN's troops. I won't be able to make one at this time.
@lewishasnoiq Are electronic warfare aircraft viable for this challenge perhaps?
wheeley goliath thing i think
+1@ALMIGHTYFRIDGE
Medium Tank, M4A2
Anybody made any fixed-wing transport aircraft or vehicles yet for this?
Wait is it okay if I reuse designs of my older work as surplus vehicles at the moment?
@lewishasnoiq
Check my most recent comment in this challenge page. In other words: Is any work within SimplePlanes only allowed for this challenge and not on other games?
Wait, are we allowed to post images of our builds from other games in this comment section but still influences the overall situation of the conflict, in this challenge? (Example: An image of some warship built in UA:D or NavalArt, An image of a tank built in Sprocket TD, etc?)
Kind of nice how I didn't get included in the video.
Phox, you have made the Cardboard A-10. Now you might want to make cardboard FV103's and FV107's just to satisfy some fewer people.
+2~~BAGONG CLASS NG MARITIME PATROL VESSEL TO SUPPLEMENT VARIOUS BARKONGS REPUBLIKA NG PILIPINAS AT TSAKA DUTERTE-CLASS NG SUPERCARRIERS AT IBANG BARKONG NG PANGINGISDA~~
I see Philippine-themed vessel, I upvote.
+5I got finals to do, and unfortunately it's neither physical sciences or maths. Although I might consider taking interest in this challenge, if I had given a higher free time priority to SP
Pampagueño living in Canada.
These rounds are cool. Now sabot pieces next
Released a Ryclian Fighter
@DragoransEscarti I might not be able to do it now but thanks for giving the idea of a different method
What are Riclia's color schemes?
+2Prototype version of the APC is shown just to give an idea of what the suspension looked like
+1