@QuiteInactiveWhiteBread quote “ I don't recommend pulling full back with flaps out because it will stall the plane and it's almost impossible to recover”
@SilverStar already tried that, the thing is that the original doesn’t show up, by making it unlisted I can’t add the vr tag. I’d also like to mention that one of the devs curated it and upvoted it so I doubt it’s that big of a deal.
Honestly I would include saclos and the other type in the same document but split it up. In that case I would wait and improve the tech inside the saclos code before writing that.
🦐
+1@Star54ilor because you sent it along with text I think
So how do we lift off?
@reimuuuua nice
@frogbot4000 thank you so much!! ❤️❤️❤️
Absolutely amazing aircraft but I am genuinely begging you to add an ejection seat🙏🙏🙏🙏
+1Niice
SimplePlanes brainrot😍😍😍
+1Hey btw you could make a more realistic one by using the f-16D that the original creator made!
@reimuuuua the U.S. never made hypersonic because they realized they were a waste of money in the 80s lol
+6Beautiful
+1Very well made!! Good job feng!!!
+1@SC2311 i completely understand, otherwise an amazing aircraft, good job!
Absolutely beautiful plane. Do you think you might add an ejection seat any time?
absolutely beautiful.🇸🇬🇸🇬🇸🇬🇸🇬🇸🇬🇸🇬🇸🇬🇸🇬🇸🇬
love you roast ham, banger after banger!!!
+2Been waiting for this ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
+1Multicrew tank combat☝️☝️☝️💯
German c-172
+1Looks like the xm800t
This is so cool
@QuiteInactiveWhiteBread quote “ I don't recommend pulling full back with flaps out because it will stall the plane and it's almost impossible to recover”
Very easy to recover after stalling, idk what you mean.
@SilverStar already tried that, the thing is that the original doesn’t show up, by making it unlisted I can’t add the vr tag. I’d also like to mention that one of the devs curated it and upvoted it so I doubt it’s that big of a deal.
@SilverStar it fits within all of these rules as well btw
@SilverStar looked for it on spvr for 45 minutes and couldn’t find it lol, there’s no easy way to find it either due to a lack of features.
@SilverStar reading the description is free btw
@SilverStar so I can see it in simpleplanesVR
@XePec thank you! Thank you for building such an amazing aircraft!
Little stinkler
+1T
@SatanIsMyPookie999 thats wild
+1LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
+1T
+1@PlaneSpike hot
+1Ejection seat?
@SuperSuperTheSylph mmmmm red flavor
+2Tasty
+3@PotatoMan1 yeah, I know, dude read the damn description.
@PotatoMan1 have you looked and noticed the difference?
@PotatoMan1 look at ku’s and then look at mine, use a tad bit more brainpower
@LunarEclipseSP ku’s aircraft, I would head over to him and check out the original as well.
+1@PotatoMan1 description*
@PotatoMan1 read the caption lmao
@OkaNieba stay hypocritical I guess, nice build tho.
+1Honestly I would include saclos and the other type in the same document but split it up. In that case I would wait and improve the tech inside the saclos code before writing that.
+1Is this otanas? It literally says otana on the side of the aircraft?
+1@OkaNieba and you also made an inside job joke as well on a post about isreal in a comment. Seems quite hypocritical.
+2@OkaNieba but you put something political on the post lol
+1@OkaNieba dude you put all eyes on rafah at the top of the post but now you say no politics lmao?
+3