@CR929thenewSPplayer
Yeah, I'm aware, but I had to catch up on University Work, and I'm going to be moving House soon. I'll try and get all the results finished by Sunday.
@MEERKAT978
No, there aren't any single seat trainers that exist, and a trainer being a single seater kind of defeats the purpose of it being a trainer.
If you're using the default canopy part, I'd suggest either just using Overload to xml mod the proportions of it and make the fuselage fit to it, or better, try and learn to make a canopy out of fuselage blocks, which is the better way in the end if you want someone more quality.
Hi, I will be deducting points as your part count is below the minimum and allowed margin.
Also, are those weapons designed for training purposes? If not and are regular weapons, there will be a point deduction for that too.
@Mikemike123
Only for the sake of training purposes.
Bombs for example, should only be training ones, meaning they shouldn't explode when they impact the ground since they don't have any explosive filler.
@16
And look, you can claim your build is fictional, but when the only visual difference to the real thing is the shape of the canopy, it's a replica, not a fictional build based on something.
@16
No....? Pretty much all planes aren't based off another. The only close example of that is aircraft of the same family, like the Spitfire and all 24 Marks of it.
Yeah, uh, buddy, if you're going to make an aircraft and say it's built by a fictional company, actually make it a fictional aircraft, not one that exists irl and was built by a different company.
At the very least, make it more unique then a seemingly exact replica of the real thing.
I've seen Black Jack in-person at the Old Buckenham air show in 2022, and I love the livery so much, it's one of my favourite aerobatic liveries.
You've done a pretty excellent job of replicating it. The two main things missing though is the part of the Union Jack sitting on-top of the roundel of the tail fin (which I understand would be very difficult to do), and the rest of the detail on the squadron roundel.
29 Squadron's roundel is quite simple as all you have to do is outline the white boxes on the sides of the RAF roundel with red, and add 3 red X's to each.
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes
I'm an outlier then. I've never once made a replica in my life and I can make decent fictional planes in my opinion.
I guess it helps my method involves taking design inspiration from a similar aircraft to what my idea looks like.
Nugget of info: The Brown and Green camo is the 'RAF Temperate Land scheme', used before 1941, and the Grey and Green camo is the 'RAF Day Fighter scheme', used after 1941. (Relating to the 'Outro' section)
@Graingy
We are talking about the guy with the Toothbrush moustache here, he loved his wonder weapons, which the Maus looks a lot more like (on paper).
@Vikram123
Unless it's bug fixes, no.
@JBPAviation
Did you post the controls as an image, because there isn't anything there.
@CR929thenewSPplayer
Yeah, I'm aware, but I had to catch up on University Work, and I'm going to be moving House soon. I'll try and get all the results finished by Sunday.
Sorry, but I can't accept this entry as the deadline has passed.
Well....shit..
+1I might give this a go when I've got all my irl stuff sorted.
I'm not accepting any new entries now, so if you failed to submit yours on time, tough luck.
You're lucky I'm being nice and accepting this after the closing date.
@Real08
I beg to differ, but you do you.
@Real08
Oh, also, I will be deducting points as this is under the minimum part count limit and allowed margin.
@Real08
...what?
@MEERKAT978
No, there aren't any single seat trainers that exist, and a trainer being a single seater kind of defeats the purpose of it being a trainer.
If you're using the default canopy part, I'd suggest either just using Overload to xml mod the proportions of it and make the fuselage fit to it, or better, try and learn to make a canopy out of fuselage blocks, which is the better way in the end if you want someone more quality.
Hi, I will be deducting points from this as the part count is below the stated minimum and allowed margin.
@PUMPKINSIDD
+1Hi, the weapons on this craft, are they meant for Training purposes?
Hi, I will be deducting points as your part count is below the minimum and allowed margin.
Also, are those weapons designed for training purposes? If not and are regular weapons, there will be a point deduction for that too.
@Mikemike123
Only for the sake of training purposes.
Bombs for example, should only be training ones, meaning they shouldn't explode when they impact the ground since they don't have any explosive filler.
Out of curiosity, what is with the anchors over the roundels?
+1Hi, I will be deducting points as this entry is below the minimum part count and respective margin.
Hi, I will be deducting points as the part count is below the minimum amount and the allowed margin.
@KorporatsiyaLK
+3Yes, I do state in the rules and regulations you can make your entry fictional or a replica.
@72
Only for training purpose.
@HelloX
2
There will be a deduction in points since you've gone below the minimum part count and the respective 50 part margin.
@Hahahahaahahshs
Fictional or a replica, just added it to the rules and regulations.
@16
And look, you can claim your build is fictional, but when the only visual difference to the real thing is the shape of the canopy, it's a replica, not a fictional build based on something.
@16
No....? Pretty much all planes aren't based off another. The only close example of that is aircraft of the same family, like the Spitfire and all 24 Marks of it.
Yeah, uh, buddy, if you're going to make an aircraft and say it's built by a fictional company, actually make it a fictional aircraft, not one that exists irl and was built by a different company.
At the very least, make it more unique then a seemingly exact replica of the real thing.
I've seen Black Jack in-person at the Old Buckenham air show in 2022, and I love the livery so much, it's one of my favourite aerobatic liveries.
You've done a pretty excellent job of replicating it. The two main things missing though is the part of the Union Jack sitting on-top of the roundel of the tail fin (which I understand would be very difficult to do), and the rest of the detail on the squadron roundel.
29 Squadron's roundel is quite simple as all you have to do is outline the white boxes on the sides of the RAF roundel with red, and add 3 red X's to each.
Everyplay was also responsible for the replay function SP had till they went kaput.
Looks oddly similar to the JH-7...
+1I like how you use whippersnappers like you're at least in your 40's
😁
What the hell is up with the weight? The loaded weight is in the same ball park as the max takeoff weight of the Mustang
Are those seriously Water-cooled MG's...?
+1Huh, seems like it goes quite a distance from Duxford
Here's a Tip.
If you have to ask, it's probably not a good idea.
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes
+1I'm an outlier then. I've never once made a replica in my life and I can make decent fictional planes in my opinion.
I guess it helps my method involves taking design inspiration from a similar aircraft to what my idea looks like.
Relatable, just not as old.
@LoneSpaceGaming
This one
@LoneSpaceGaming
Mod.
If it were me, I'd turn the halo off, get the picture, then add the halo in post-editing.
+1Man...SP Police are brutal..
+1@FlirBlitz
Yeah, I know. Still existed irl.
@FlirBlitz
You do know that Krasnovia already exists in real life, right..?
I must say, this is a pretty supurb trailer.
+2Nugget of info: The Brown and Green camo is the 'RAF Temperate Land scheme', used before 1941, and the Grey and Green camo is the 'RAF Day Fighter scheme', used after 1941. (Relating to the 'Outro' section)
+2Quite literally the MOAB.
+1I hate all of these
+2This needs a lot more attention, simply put.
+2Yeah...how do you land this...
+1@Graingy
We are talking about the guy with the Toothbrush moustache here, he loved his wonder weapons, which the Maus looks a lot more like (on paper).