1) How much focus was Rooster's backstory supposed to have anyways? It only gets talked about two or three times if I remember and not in massive detail.
=-=
2) Maybe, but consider the terrain. Also, even if they went completely vertical, they still have to put the Hornets into that attitude in the first place. And they are pulling up from a high speed dive which just increases the G's they'd be pulling.
=-=
3) This is a person we're talking about. Just because Coyote was seemingly the only one who experienced G-lock during the training, doesn't mean he's the only person ever who experiences it.
I guess the Hornet stalling though is a bit odd.
=-=
4) This is supposed to be realistic-ish and set in real life. When is reality ever truly equal when it comes to military tech?
=-=
5) Mmm, depends. You're obviously not going to put a prop fighter against a 4th or 5th gen fighter, but the tech in the movie is close enough that the pilot matters in a dogfight.
=-=
6) Uh, no? Just get any military pilot(s) who know stuff to look at the movie. This has been done already. Not saying everything is accurate, but it's not limited to the Hawkeye comms.
=-=
7) I guess, but he wasn't in the main strike package, so, different plans (or whatever you want to call it)?
On the 5th point, I get how temperatures were hot and might be bad for an early sidewinder, but's it's probably more the fact Air to Air missile tech was in its early stages, considering the sidewinder and sparrow were only introduced into service a couple years after the start of the war. Plus, there is a reason why fighters still have guns since the birth of dogfighting.
@GhostHTX
Looks pretty nice, but you need more in the ways of photos.
You especially need a better thumbnail as it just doesn't make the build stand out. The only thing that stands out to me in said thumbnail is the missiles because of the contrast. Improving these small things can go a long way.
@YpaYpafromCN
Looks really nice and quality.
One thing though, I think you could benefit from having at least one photo of the cockpit and it's details, because I can see there is detail there, would be good for those that don't or can't download it to see it.
I had no idea there were any members of the P-39 family that were airworthy.
Shame one is now forever gone, along with the B-17.
An even more massive shame that lives were lost....
Nice looking build, but a couple pointers.
- First, that thumbnail is just a bit too bright. Some sort of vignette of light on it. I would take that off so it doesn't look like there's a light-filled haze around the build.
- Second, some more pictures.
- Third, I'm sort of doubting if Trim is the only control, excluding the basic ones. IF it is, fine. If not, list the others.
Other then that, all good.
@HololiveFan
What's your point?
They're two different aircraft, the top one still bears those extra livery details, the other one just doesn't.
But both are in the same base livery, which is the Airbus house livery for the Neo line.
AND, the first one just has image details in the 'Neo' on the tail fin. For example, if you look at the top of the 'N' on the right side, you'll see the Elizabeth Tower (or Big Ben as you'll probably know it).
@ThomasRoderick
Well, I don't serve in the RAF, just the Air Cadets, which is technically part of the RAF, but not the actual force.
I'm just a big aviation nerd.
Very nice, but just a couple pointers.
1. The opposite platform looks weird compared to the one Thomas is at, looks like its sloping upwards instead of being level.
2. The people boarding Annie and Clarabel look too small.
@LonelyAustrianUhlan
Well, yeah, I know it's a Ukrainian company now, but go look at its history and about its foundation, you'll probably see what I mean.
@Vincent
Did you use Blender or something for this?
@GuianLorenzo
Do you mind if I use the Artificial Horizon?
(Edit: nvm)
Where's British Airways?
1) How much focus was Rooster's backstory supposed to have anyways? It only gets talked about two or three times if I remember and not in massive detail.
+2=-=
2) Maybe, but consider the terrain. Also, even if they went completely vertical, they still have to put the Hornets into that attitude in the first place. And they are pulling up from a high speed dive which just increases the G's they'd be pulling.
=-=
3) This is a person we're talking about. Just because Coyote was seemingly the only one who experienced G-lock during the training, doesn't mean he's the only person ever who experiences it.
I guess the Hornet stalling though is a bit odd.
=-=
4) This is supposed to be realistic-ish and set in real life. When is reality ever truly equal when it comes to military tech?
=-=
5) Mmm, depends. You're obviously not going to put a prop fighter against a 4th or 5th gen fighter, but the tech in the movie is close enough that the pilot matters in a dogfight.
=-=
6) Uh, no? Just get any military pilot(s) who know stuff to look at the movie. This has been done already. Not saying everything is accurate, but it's not limited to the Hawkeye comms.
=-=
7) I guess, but he wasn't in the main strike package, so, different plans (or whatever you want to call it)?
On the 5th point, I get how temperatures were hot and might be bad for an early sidewinder, but's it's probably more the fact Air to Air missile tech was in its early stages, considering the sidewinder and sparrow were only introduced into service a couple years after the start of the war. Plus, there is a reason why fighters still have guns since the birth of dogfighting.
+1@R4FABR
Target Pod
@GhostHTX
+1Looks pretty nice, but you need more in the ways of photos.
You especially need a better thumbnail as it just doesn't make the build stand out. The only thing that stands out to me in said thumbnail is the missiles because of the contrast. Improving these small things can go a long way.
@SheriffHackdogMCPE
+2Photoshop. Lightroom if it's a photograph.
I'm aware the line quality of the logo isn't 'amazing', but since this is mostly put in the corners of my thumbnails, it won't really matter.
@YpaYpafromCN
+2Looks really nice and quality.
One thing though, I think you could benefit from having at least one photo of the cockpit and it's details, because I can see there is detail there, would be good for those that don't or can't download it to see it.
@HuskyDynamics01
Probably because it hasn't been coded into the Pyramid's activation trigger.
It worked for me when I flew inside and went straight up the the middle on the inside. and out through the top.
+1May the crew of both aircraft be at peace.
+5(Also Teyvat, in reference to the notes, good luck on your journey.)
I had no idea there were any members of the P-39 family that were airworthy.
+5Shame one is now forever gone, along with the B-17.
An even more massive shame that lives were lost....
You've got WAY better results with reflective bumpmapping then me.
Nice looking build, but a couple pointers.
+3- First, that thumbnail is just a bit too bright. Some sort of vignette of light on it. I would take that off so it doesn't look like there's a light-filled haze around the build.
- Second, some more pictures.
- Third, I'm sort of doubting if Trim is the only control, excluding the basic ones. IF it is, fine. If not, list the others.
Other then that, all good.
@Otana
Maybe I will. But I will tell you it was a right PAIN in the arse to get the flag to look half decent on the tail-fin. Worth it though.
@Gen
Lies, there is Britain.
RULLLLLE BRITANIA!
@HololiveFan
+4What's your point?
They're two different aircraft, the top one still bears those extra livery details, the other one just doesn't.
But both are in the same base livery, which is the Airbus house livery for the Neo line.
AND, the first one just has image details in the 'Neo' on the tail fin. For example, if you look at the top of the 'N' on the right side, you'll see the Elizabeth Tower (or Big Ben as you'll probably know it).
@HololiveFan
Sorry...what?
@Mondayhater
2:54pm as I type this.
@Mondayhater
+1Not sure why you're apologizing...you don't need to.
And Ireland does use the same timezone as Britain.
@Mondayhater
Earlier builds probably.
That's really good!
+2@Holymissile
The main issue is the muzzle break. The 6pdr has a flat cylindrical shape with no conical shape in it.
What gun did you put on it, because that doesn't look like the 6 Pounder...
+1Jesus.....talk about detail.
+1Twas a Sea Fury I think. If so, it's a Sea Fury no longer.
@PlaneFlightX
+2That's a computer though...
@HariTheSnakk
+7Something like this though would be pretty heavy on a mobile device.
Lovely livery
Sacrificed a certain number of goats.
+2Woah, you're amazing at photographing aircraft.
I see I need to step my game up..
Yeah...why?
I love how we sometimes get absolute gems of builds from some of the lowest ranked/newest accounts.
You've got some really good potential 👍
+1Sabaton a lot of the time.
+1@xNotDumb
You've made your own builds, have you not?
@xNotDumb
It's the orthographic view.....
You know this <~<
@IceCraftGaming
+2Funeral...?
Getting banned doesn't mean they're dead...
@xNotDumb
What?
@ThomasRoderick
+2Well, I don't serve in the RAF, just the Air Cadets, which is technically part of the RAF, but not the actual force.
I'm just a big aviation nerd.
@CanadianAircraftBuilder
+1Right....?
Very nice, but just a couple pointers.
1. The opposite platform looks weird compared to the one Thomas is at, looks like its sloping upwards instead of being level.
2. The people boarding Annie and Clarabel look too small.
Over then that, very well done.
+5@Souplane
+1There is trim...
And are you able to describe the turret problem in more detail?
@imunsure
What?
And asteroidbook, I know Britain's Monarch doesn't work off age, it's more complicated.
+3@X99STRIKER
+2@asteroidbook345
King Charles III, Queen Elizabeth II's son has become the king now.
@beenz
+1Quicksand when I was really young and caught in a wave at a beach in Turkey.
@LonelyAustrianUhlan
Well, yeah, I know it's a Ukrainian company now, but go look at its history and about its foundation, you'll probably see what I mean.