Most of these are generally good, here's my thoughts:
1) The situation you described might depend a lot on the specifics of the build, but the drag system as a whole could definitely use at least some modernizing (remember, it was designed with basic blocks in mind, not all the funky clipping stuff people do regularly these days).
2) Like the ability to control fuel and have it in different tanks instead of just one big "fuel percentage" that pulls from all of them? That'd be cool, though I'd prefer if it was optional because sometimes it can be better (and certainly easier) to just put fuel wherever and have it work anyway.
3) I don't think a story or campaign is needed in the base game (beyond a set of tutorial missions, for example), but I hope that it can be done via modding (at least, more in-depth than it can now) because that would be really cool.
4) Too vague.
5) Part materials would be really neat, though I wonder if it would be better to allow for the appearance and its properties to be adjusted separately to accommodate less realistic designs.
6) Yes, please. Juno: New Origins already does engine customization quite well in my opinion, though I assume SP2 will have more options since it's a plane game and not a rocket game.
7) Not a glitch. If that's happening, your wing loading is too high (basically, pulling up is making the wing stall because there isn't enough wing area for the mass of the plane). Reduce weight, increase wing area, or both.
8) This is exactly what trim is for. An automatic trim mode would be kinda neat, though.
9) Again, Juno: New Origins does this very well and I'm expecting it to be the same or better in SP2.
10) Almost guaranteed given the shot of a submarine in the trailer.
11) Sure, though like SP1 they should be able to be disabled (or at least not always hostile, like the convoy tanks).
12) Tank tracks would be cool, but mech legs have so many design variations that I don't think a single customizable part would really work.
13) That's still not something up to Jundroo, it's up to Google and Apple, and they said no a long time ago. Most likely not happening, at least not officially.
@Erionh In that case, it should be reported (one of the options when reporting a build is "Post is a copy of another airplane.") and the mods would take action if necessary, yes.
@Erionh Good news, this is why the successor system exists. From the sounds of it, Nalanji is upset about planes that are using it and do offer variation from the original (i.e. aren't just direct copies), so no rules are being broken.
Hey... If kids having fun in a game is upsetting you because they aren't doing it to your standards, then... maybe you should consider taking a break for a little bit. I'm not trying to be rude or dismissive, but this isn't something you should waste time getting frustrated about. Remember, the point of videogames is to have fun, and... well, not everyone is going to do that in the same way, y'know?
@32 I just searched for "unity low poly car pack" images and looked for the one that had cars from the trailer in it. I initially identified the right one from the tan van with red and orange stripes, and then I checked back with the trailer to make sure the other vehicles were also from the same pack.
also as an engineering student I can confirm the motivation for taking too many credit hours is indeed "RAHHHHHH I WANT TO BUILD COOL STUFF" as well as a general "full send / we ball" attitude
@GhostMach Woah, calm down, man. I was just joking a little, but maybe it didn't come through as I intended (in which case I apologize for however it did come across, because I didn't mean it to be anything serious or rude). I'm not offended or angry or anything.
@GhostMach In that case you darn kids better get off my lawn
But either way, the automod can't ban people, falsely or otherwise. It literally can't. All it does is automatically generate reports which are sent to the actual (human) moderators, who then decide whether or not to take action in the same way that they have for the last eleven years.
Dream car? Second-gen Pontiac Firebird, hands down. I'm more partial to the '70-'73 (and of course the '77-'78) in terms of aesthetics, but honestly I'd go for any model year.
Realistically? Something that won't break on me, has a CD player instead of a touchscreen, and isn't a coupe or small sedan. (I don't have anything against them, but I am a few inches taller than average... also, cargo space is nice.) Not sure what that'll be yet, though.
@factpoultry Select the plane, go into edit mode, hit Ctrl+B, move your mouse, and click, then switch it to Vertices (instead of Edges) in the menu that pops up in the bottom left.
super hornet after thanksgiving at grandma's
+3Most of these are generally good, here's my thoughts:
+11) The situation you described might depend a lot on the specifics of the build, but the drag system as a whole could definitely use at least some modernizing (remember, it was designed with basic blocks in mind, not all the funky clipping stuff people do regularly these days).
2) Like the ability to control fuel and have it in different tanks instead of just one big "fuel percentage" that pulls from all of them? That'd be cool, though I'd prefer if it was optional because sometimes it can be better (and certainly easier) to just put fuel wherever and have it work anyway.
3) I don't think a story or campaign is needed in the base game (beyond a set of tutorial missions, for example), but I hope that it can be done via modding (at least, more in-depth than it can now) because that would be really cool.
4) Too vague.
5) Part materials would be really neat, though I wonder if it would be better to allow for the appearance and its properties to be adjusted separately to accommodate less realistic designs.
6) Yes, please. Juno: New Origins already does engine customization quite well in my opinion, though I assume SP2 will have more options since it's a plane game and not a rocket game.
7) Not a glitch. If that's happening, your wing loading is too high (basically, pulling up is making the wing stall because there isn't enough wing area for the mass of the plane). Reduce weight, increase wing area, or both.
8) This is exactly what trim is for. An automatic trim mode would be kinda neat, though.
9) Again, Juno: New Origins does this very well and I'm expecting it to be the same or better in SP2.
10) Almost guaranteed given the shot of a submarine in the trailer.
11) Sure, though like SP1 they should be able to be disabled (or at least not always hostile, like the convoy tanks).
12) Tank tracks would be cool, but mech legs have so many design variations that I don't think a single customizable part would really work.
13) That's still not something up to Jundroo, it's up to Google and Apple, and they said no a long time ago. Most likely not happening, at least not officially.
Kingfisher 541 reporting, we'll watch this one from the sidelines. Happy hunting, folks.
+1I mean, if you want to, sure. It's up to you.
+1I apparently missed whatever happened, but I can tell that the accounts haven't been deleted because their comment histories are still accessible.
+1What a terrible day to have an internet connection
+6https://toycosmos.bandcamp.com/album/flying-machine
we got schizophrenia before SP2
+6https://www.simpleplanes.com/Airplanes/Best?d=0
+1congratulations on your trip around the sun
+1Sounds like you'd better get started!
@Erionh In that case, it should be reported (one of the options when reporting a build is "Post is a copy of another airplane.") and the mods would take action if necessary, yes.
SimplePlanes is not free, period. Where did you download it from? There is no free download on this website.
+1@Erionh Good news, this is why the successor system exists. From the sounds of it, Nalanji is upset about planes that are using it and do offer variation from the original (i.e. aren't just direct copies), so no rules are being broken.
@Monarchii I can't help but add that the words "argue with an" feel superfluous.
Hey... If kids having fun in a game is upsetting you because they aren't doing it to your standards, then... maybe you should consider taking a break for a little bit. I'm not trying to be rude or dismissive, but this isn't something you should waste time getting frustrated about. Remember, the point of videogames is to have fun, and... well, not everyone is going to do that in the same way, y'know?
+2The real explanation is that a bunch of people are parodying @Graingy for... some reason. Dunno beyond that.
+2Mass hysteria
+3@Graingy That's not delivery, and it sure as heck ain't DiGiorno either
Is there free shipping?
At least take the time to link people to the source you're plagiarizing.
Edit: Just deleting the entire article you copied and pasted works too I guess.
+1https://xkcd.com/37/
adblock
+1@32 I just searched for "unity low poly car pack" images and looked for the one that had cars from the trailer in it. I initially identified the right one from the tan van with red and orange stripes, and then I checked back with the trailer to make sure the other vehicles were also from the same pack.
+1Yup.
+2but why would I want wingdings in my browser?
Is the one on the nose not just literally the regular logo but with the text removed?
+1the future is now old man
+1also as an engineering student I can confirm the motivation for taking too many credit hours is indeed "RAHHHHHH I WANT TO BUILD COOL STUFF" as well as a general "full send / we ball" attitude
+2woah
+1yeah
baaaaaaby
@Graingy good point
maybe y'all should start chanting or something
I didn't realize what this was about until I went to the comments. Oh. Oh no.
+4@TheMouse Nope, beyond the hunch that it's probably linked to the automod somehow because it just started happening after the automod was deployed.
+1Have noticed this as well.
+1Ah, to go back to the days when worrying about getting booted from a website was akin to the end of the world.
+3...maybe I am old.
@GhostMach Woah, calm down, man. I was just joking a little, but maybe it didn't come through as I intended (in which case I apologize for however it did come across, because I didn't mean it to be anything serious or rude). I'm not offended or angry or anything.
@GhostMach In that case you darn kids better get off my lawn
But either way, the automod can't ban people, falsely or otherwise. It literally can't. All it does is automatically generate reports which are sent to the actual (human) moderators, who then decide whether or not to take action in the same way that they have for the last eleven years.
@GhostMach Read SupremeDorian's comment directly below yours.
+2@LowQualityRepublic @Nathangaming82075 See WNP78's comment below if you're concerned about false bans.
@LM0418 See WNP78's comment below.
+1All hail our new robot overlords.
+5Dream car? Second-gen Pontiac Firebird, hands down. I'm more partial to the '70-'73 (and of course the '77-'78) in terms of aesthetics, but honestly I'd go for any model year.
+6Realistically? Something that won't break on me, has a CD player instead of a touchscreen, and isn't a coupe or small sedan. (I don't have anything against them, but I am a few inches taller than average... also, cargo space is nice.) Not sure what that'll be yet, though.
Who is "we"?
@RowanPJ Ah, so ban evasion then. Cheers.
@RowanPJ Wait who are you
womp womp
@Graingy :P
+1@factpoultry Select the plane, go into edit mode, hit Ctrl+B, move your mouse, and click, then switch it to Vertices (instead of Edges) in the menu that pops up in the bottom left.
+1@factpoultry :3
+1