@TheMouse SP2 has definitely become a very strong contender based on today's info, though given how small the Jundroo team is, I'm not expecting a full new game to drop tomorrow (though it's certainly a possibility). Whatever's happening, it's definitely specific to SimplePlanes because the same date is not present on the Juno: New Origins site. I'm very excited to see what we get tomorrow!
Didn't you post this exact thing like six months ago or something? I recall reading this exact story in one of your other posts a while back.
'Course, it's hard to say because you delete most of your forums after a week or so anyway.
@ColonelRelford Can you rephrase that? I don't understand what you're trying to get at. This has become an oddly specific inquiry; is it based on anything in particular?
@ColonelRelford In that case, someone needs to reevaluate the spending decisions of whoever oversees the machines. From a financial perspective, if you have a part (or machine) that will let you do a job quicker and more cheaply, but you keep it on reserve in favor of an inferior part or machine, you've made a very peculiar decision and are not running the machines as efficiently as possible.
Depends on how you define machine, and whether you consider a human to fit that definition.
But I'm pretty sure that a human flying a plane will have more success than a plane flying the human, if that answers the second part.
"Hando" is very particular about their copyrights and trademarks, as in they don't want anyone else using them. This is not something specific to SimplePlanes, nor is it a recent thing (Even the one for MSFS that costs like $40 is simply the "HJet").
why was the gear so slow
why did the gear CATCH FIRE FOR NO REASON
where did the nose gear go
what was that physics-defying bounce
why did the engines decide to fall off and then spectacularly detonate
what were the last two seconds of the video
what does the song have to do with it
there are so many questions and none of them are worth answering
If you ask me, this is where prioritizing quotas, DEI, and political correctness over actual skill, experience, and the ability to say no will get you. Aviation is the one field where skill and experience should be prioritized over all else, and in my opinion what we're seeing is what happens when these are placed in the back seat in favor of fitting whatever agenda is the current hot topic.
(It's really unfortunate for me actually because in a year or two I might be working there on an internship. I wish I could say I still looked forward to that like I did when I was a kid, but I can't anymore.)
@LOGANP117withmachinegun
A dc10 means the player needs to roll a 10 or higher to pass whatever check or save (stealth, insight, perception, etc.) they need to do in order to succeed.
D&D joke that didn't land (ironically) (wait now I'm meta-referencing, this is trippy)
Russia 1 and 2 seem like they would be the most universally effective due to the less bold colors, but Ukraine 2 and 3 are also extremely good-looking. Not so much a fan of Ukraine 1 or the Kazakhstan pattern; in my opinion that kind of bold and blobby camo only works with like Vietnam-era greens and browns.
"Bold and willful, they do not tremble as they blaspheme the glorious ones, whereas angels, though greater in might and power, do not pronounce a blasphemous judgment against them before the Lord. But these, like irrational animals, creatures of instinct, born to be caught and destroyed, blaspheming about matters of which they are ignorant, will also be destroyed in their destruction, suffering wrong as the wage for their wrongdoing." 2 Peter 2:10-13, ESV
There should be a movement increment (or something similar named, I forgot what it's labeled as) towards the bottom of the position/rotation adjustment panel. You might need to scroll down.
The default value should be .078125
The C-47 in question has 47 parts and no interior. The only notable difference between it and a civilian DC-3 at that scale is the cargo door (and technically the engine performance, but better to get that so that it flies like it should rather than making the numbers in the editor match up precisely). In short, I do not understand the problem.
Huh, okay. Well, in order to give my thoughts I'm going to know precisely what you mean by "lack of effort put in by Jundroo," because wrapping up development on a nine-year-old game to finally fully move to their next major project is decidedly not lack of effort.
My inability to understand the meaning of this post is further impeded by your inability to communicate in a decipherable manner, as well as an abhorrent lack of both punctuation and any kind of formatting structure.
Short version:
When you bought the game you did so with the full knowledge that development would eventually come to an end, as with pretty much every other game that doesn't follow the content-as-a-service model, and now that that time has come you're claiming you've been betrayed?
Have y'all not had games reach end-of-life before? They aren't trying to subconsciously convert everyone to Juno so they can axe SP, they're just finished developing SP and have moved on to their next project (and are showing it off here because... people that play both, I guess?).
it feels like a massive stab in the back for Jundroo to pay little to no attention to Simpleplanes to make it a better PC and mobile game
The game has been out for over nine years (December 2014 was the first launch, on mobile only; the Steam version came a year later), which is a fairly long time for a video game these days and a rather absurdly long time for an indie game, much less a studio's first truly successful game (sorry SimplePhysics and SR1, but it's kinda true), much less one that was originally just a mobile game. There is no backstabbing or desecration (whatever that would mean in this context); it's been public knowledge for a long time now that SP is built on spaghetti code and became more and more difficult to update over the years (a fate Juno will hopefully avoid now that they know what not to do).
The game isn't being worked on anymore because it's almost a decade old and the developers decided it was time to work on something bigger and (arguably) better. That's just how it is.
Also, please don't tag me on things I have not requested to be tagged on.
Well, I use Firefox as well and this hasn't happened to me (so far, at least), so I'd suggest running a virus scan on your end.
Also, what adblock do you use?
Counterpoint
+1Jundroo has never not cooked
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
+1@TheMouse SP2 has definitely become a very strong contender based on today's info, though given how small the Jundroo team is, I'm not expecting a full new game to drop tomorrow (though it's certainly a possibility). Whatever's happening, it's definitely specific to SimplePlanes because the same date is not present on the Juno: New Origins site. I'm very excited to see what we get tomorrow!
+1me
+1Honestly, I don't support this. It's very idealistic, but it's not practical.
+1Didn't you post this exact thing like six months ago or something? I recall reading this exact story in one of your other posts a while back.
+1'Course, it's hard to say because you delete most of your forums after a week or so anyway.
Lion jacket
+1@ColonelRelford Can you rephrase that? I don't understand what you're trying to get at. This has become an oddly specific inquiry; is it based on anything in particular?
+1@ColonelRelford In that case, someone needs to reevaluate the spending decisions of whoever oversees the machines. From a financial perspective, if you have a part (or machine) that will let you do a job quicker and more cheaply, but you keep it on reserve in favor of an inferior part or machine, you've made a very peculiar decision and are not running the machines as efficiently as possible.
+1Depends on how you define machine, and whether you consider a human to fit that definition.
+1But I'm pretty sure that a human flying a plane will have more success than a plane flying the human, if that answers the second part.
There should be a gray button that says Edit next to the "Player biography" header at the top.
+1"Hando" is very particular about their copyrights and trademarks, as in they don't want anyone else using them. This is not something specific to SimplePlanes, nor is it a recent thing (Even the one for MSFS that costs like $40 is simply the "HJet").
+1How did you manage to turn grain into a two-syllable word and also your entire identity?
+1You might be able to do it if you somehow get the input in the form of a sine wave. Not sure though; I've never tried the tone generator mod.
+1vs Gravity
+1Who introduced giraffes to the KV-2 enclosure? You can't do that, they're endangered and you know how they try to mimic things with little success.
+1@Mousewithamachinegun122 Arkansas is not an incentive
+1he is the storm that is approaching
+1I genuinely can't tell if this is worldbuilding, schizophrenia, or if someone else actually got into your account.
+1Personally I like to think that the mods are mature enough to resolve whatever issues they may have between them in a civil manner.
+1still easier to pay off than the US national debt
+1I'm sorry but https://xkcd.com/927/
+1honestly MousewithaMorgan is a pretty good name too actually
+1When I was a gold rank
+1Ya ba dibba dibba dibba dibba dibba dibba dum
@ThatKindaWeeb I think there's some sort of combined pitch/yaw control that keeps it from shifting unexpectedly, but I'm not sure on that.
+1why was the gear so slow
+1why did the gear CATCH FIRE FOR NO REASON
where did the nose gear go
what was that physics-defying bounce
why did the engines decide to fall off and then spectacularly detonate
what were the last two seconds of the video
what does the song have to do with it
there are so many questions and none of them are worth answering
If you ask me, this is where prioritizing quotas, DEI, and political correctness over actual skill, experience, and the ability to say no will get you. Aviation is the one field where skill and experience should be prioritized over all else, and in my opinion what we're seeing is what happens when these are placed in the back seat in favor of fitting whatever agenda is the current hot topic.
+1(It's really unfortunate for me actually because in a year or two I might be working there on an internship. I wish I could say I still looked forward to that like I did when I was a kid, but I can't anymore.)
@LOGANP117withmachinegun
A dc10 means the player needs to roll a 10 or higher to pass whatever check or save (stealth, insight, perception, etc.) they need to do in order to succeed.
D&D joke that didn't land (ironically) (wait now I'm meta-referencing, this is trippy)
+1LATELY I'VE BEEN, I'VE BEEN LOSIN' SLEEP
+1(finals next week will do that to ya)
@Randomplayer The Industrial Revolution and its consequences are also what allowed you to share that with the world.
+1Time to change your name to @Mousewithoutamachinegun122
+1I thought acquiring people was frowned upon after the Civil War
+1Russia 1 and 2 seem like they would be the most universally effective due to the less bold colors, but Ukraine 2 and 3 are also extremely good-looking. Not so much a fan of Ukraine 1 or the Kazakhstan pattern; in my opinion that kind of bold and blobby camo only works with like Vietnam-era greens and browns.
+1@Monarchii uh oh I've been spotted
+1DE6 control stand go brr
+1@Funnny
"Bold and willful, they do not tremble as they blaspheme the glorious ones, whereas angels, though greater in might and power, do not pronounce a blasphemous judgment against them before the Lord. But these, like irrational animals, creatures of instinct, born to be caught and destroyed, blaspheming about matters of which they are ignorant, will also be destroyed in their destruction, suffering wrong as the wage for their wrongdoing."
+12 Peter 2:10-13, ESV
@AtlasAir747MyBeloved oh hey spy on me next
+1(like seriously go ahead and do it, I want to see if my online security is as good as I think it is)
What possessed you to make this, and why did you listen
+1Objectively the best replica on the site of a very unique and beautiful plane. Well done!
+1There should be a movement increment (or something similar named, I forgot what it's labeled as) towards the bottom of the position/rotation adjustment panel. You might need to scroll down.
+1The default value should be .078125
- You're being creepy again, stop it.
- The C-47 in question has 47 parts and no interior. The only notable difference between it and a civilian DC-3 at that scale is the cargo door (and technically the engine performance, but better to get that so that it flies like it should rather than making the numbers in the editor match up precisely). In short, I do not understand the problem.
+1
+1LEGO disassembling sounds@HuskyDynamics01
+1edit: yep
@WisconsinStatePolice you shall NOT slander Burt Rutan in this house
+1Huh, okay. Well, in order to give my thoughts I'm going to know precisely what you mean by "lack of effort put in by Jundroo," because wrapping up development on a nine-year-old game to finally fully move to their next major project is decidedly not lack of effort.
+1My inability to understand the meaning of this post is further impeded by your inability to communicate in a decipherable manner, as well as an abhorrent lack of both punctuation and any kind of formatting structure.
+1Short version:
+1When you bought the game you did so with the full knowledge that development would eventually come to an end, as with pretty much every other game that doesn't follow the content-as-a-service model, and now that that time has come you're claiming you've been betrayed?
Have y'all not had games reach end-of-life before? They aren't trying to subconsciously convert everyone to Juno so they can axe SP, they're just finished developing SP and have moved on to their next project (and are showing it off here because... people that play both, I guess?).
The game has been out for over nine years (December 2014 was the first launch, on mobile only; the Steam version came a year later), which is a fairly long time for a video game these days and a rather absurdly long time for an indie game, much less a studio's first truly successful game (sorry SimplePhysics and SR1, but it's kinda true), much less one that was originally just a mobile game. There is no backstabbing or desecration (whatever that would mean in this context); it's been public knowledge for a long time now that SP is built on spaghetti code and became more and more difficult to update over the years (a fate Juno will hopefully avoid now that they know what not to do).
+1The game isn't being worked on anymore because it's almost a decade old and the developers decided it was time to work on something bigger and (arguably) better. That's just how it is.
Also, please don't tag me on things I have not requested to be tagged on.
One way to check whether it's Firefox or not would be to visit the site in a different browser.
+1Well, I use Firefox as well and this hasn't happened to me (so far, at least), so I'd suggest running a virus scan on your end.
+1Also, what adblock do you use?