@BMilan definitely taking that into consideration for my next build! Thank you for the input as that helps make the vehicle more player friendly, and I plan on releasing a whole history of this alternate world soon! Again, thank you.
@DJS8Corporations I do, although not super commonly, I'm trying to work it more into my schedule, actually I may decide to stream simpleplanes in a bit.
@Shootingstar07 yeah that was the half point docker and what really confused me, in the screenshot it was really good, but in PC flight it was super reflective,
@LancasterAce @ColonelStriker @hopotumon @squideater56 @Pilothouston5 @Jurassicty060 @poopatron71 @MarshallLewisAerospace @PapaFoxtrotA51 @Shootingstar07 @GhostHTX @Geckoplane5 @ND40X @ProjectTank @greasytortle @Texasfam04
The challenge has officially concluded with the judging of the aircraft: the results are here
Handling, stability, agility: 8/10 - the aircraft handles very well, however when the wings are swept in, there is little to no mobility with the aircraft, and even with trim as high as it can, the Peace Walker XB-75 still nose dives to where its a constant fight with the aircraft, although, this may be pilot error, please feel free to correct me on this.
Realistic model and behavior: 8/10 - aside from the very unresponsive controls when ag7 is in motion, the bomber acts like a bomber should, the design seems very plausable and makes me sad something like this doesn't exist.
Details, paint and other: 9.5/10 - almost everything about this plane is perfect, the paneling, the markings... although, the very reflective white(which would be super noticable) and the lack of roundels do unfortunate take a tiny toll on the crafts overall score.
Build quality: 11/10 - amazing design, and impressive output, I have to say this aircraft was definetly well thought out and executed nicely. and extra point has been added due to the addition of a functioning cockpit view.
Personal impression: 10/10 -this was a very nice and unique aircraft, I was intrigued with its design and was very pleased with how it operated.
Description: 9.5/10 - A very nicely done history, however abeit a little short.
@Texasfam04 hey any time! I can't wait until I make a new challenge, everyone brought something interesting to the table. and on the extensions, there will never be an issue if anyone needs one, I understand life happens.
Handling, stability, agility: 9/10 - handles very nicely and good stability, however the aircraft rolls a little too well in my opinion.
Realistic model and behavior: 7/10 - The aircraft has a weight displacement issue when all its muntions are depleted, making it rather difficult to control, otherwise the VX-4 Shadow responds very well.
Details, paint and other: 10/10 - very nicely done with the lights, folds, vents and control panels, although there isn't much in terms of paneling, I can overlook it with how well everything else is.
Build quality: 9/10 - the Aircraft looks amazing, is super smooth and rounded, however my only gripe is from the stability issue that doesn't give this a solid 10.
Personal impression: 10/10 - the aircraft was well worth the wait, the design is very nice, its reminds me of a mix between a B-2 and a Myasishchev M-50.
Description: 10/10 - a very nicely detailed description of the aircraft, a good history, and added screenshots make it very desirable.
Handling, stability, agility: 9/10 - This aircraft acts much more like a fighter aircraft than a bomber, however given that it's more set as a 5th gen bomber I'm not going to dock as many points off for the roll capability.
Realistic model and behavior: 5/10 - I really hate to dock points here because this is such a nice build, but the fact that fuel tanks were modded for extra fuel really nips some points away. the aircraft otherwise does a fantastic job with its reliability.
Details, paint and other: 8/10 - A very nice, subtle two tone grey, leading to a darker nose is very nice, however it does lack any paneling and markings which kinda leaves a little more to be desired.
Build quality: 10/10 - Practically flawless in design; the FSB-22 Wraith definetly excels at both form and function.
Personal impression: 10/10 - I absolutely love everything about the look of this aircraft, the sleek 5th gen style, paired with the very well done moving parts, this aircraft is near perfect.
Description: 0/10 - the lack of any description really docks this plane a lot...
Handling, stability, agility: 8/10 - It flies very nicely, however it acts more of a heavy fighter/attacker than it does a bomber, which unfortunately docks some points.
Realistic model and behavior: 10/10 The stability, and reaction time of this aircraft is really well done!
Details, paint and other: 5/10 - as much as I like this aircraft, the lack of details and other things does make me a little sad that it was so barren.
Build quality: 10.5/10 - Very well done with the sleekness of the aircraft, paired with it's efficency, I am also adding a .5 to the score for the gun movement!
Personal impression: 10/10 - honestly, I was a little hesitant on flying this aircraft in the beginning, however it far exceeded my expectations with everything it can do! I look forward to seeing more aircraft from you.
Description: 7/10 - a nice short history, however I feel a little more would have sufficed.
Handling, stability, agility: 9/10 - Handles very nicely, however there is a slight problem that the aircraft seems a little too nose heavy. It's mobility is nice and low, fitting for a bomber role.
Realistic model and behavior: 8/10 - the wings do flail slightly, aside from that, the aircraft behaves nicely.
Details, paint and other: 8/10 - love the design of the roundels, however the stripey grey and green are something that I had to adjust to a bit.
Build quality: 9/10 - Functions well and looks great! It's very nicely done, however its just that wing flail that hurts her.
Personal impression: 10/10 - From the moment I seen this aircraft I knew I was going to have some fun with it, and it did not disappoint.
Description: 10/10 - good description, nicely laid out.
@JamesBoA the G-6 model mostly,
@JamesBoA Essentially, yes.
@Freerider2142 @Hyattorama Thank you so much!
+1@Thefrenchdude22 Thank you!
@hellcatz, @ AtlasAviation Thank you!
@Ruffes123 Thank you!
@CRJ900Pilot @Aeromen Thank you!
@Roswell Thank you!
@CRJ900Pilot thank you
@CptJacobson it looks really good!
@ThomasRoderick it was actually heavily inspired by the polish LWS-6
+1This was an incredibly fun challenge, I can't wait for the next one.
Waiting to see the next part of qualifiers. That was enjoyable to watch
+1@EchoWhiskey11 Thank you for setting up the competition so I could design this!
+1I'm down for this challenge!
@ThomasRoderick it's a more original aircraft, however, I did get inspired by the V bombers and I did borrow queues from the Victors cockpit.
Looks good!
@EchoWhiskey11 Alright sweet, thanks!
+1Question, is a VTOL engine allowed purely for exhaust design? It has 0 thrust. also, does No XML mods go for decals too?
+1lemme know when this is done, it looks great
+1@Destroyerz117 Thank you
@Minecraftpoweer No problem, this is a very nice and well built vehicle!
@Texasfam04 Thanks, I just now seen this message, that was actually what I got the inspiration off of.
This is a beauty,
+1Magnificent! This is easily one of my favorite builds on SP now!
Oh boy, Consider me in this challenge!
+2@BMilan Originally it was set at 500,000 and I forgot the original number :L
@BMilan took your advice on the changes, I like it much better now, thank you!
+1@BMilan definitely taking that into consideration for my next build! Thank you for the input as that helps make the vehicle more player friendly, and I plan on releasing a whole history of this alternate world soon! Again, thank you.
+1@LOWEWAYY Absolutely :)
@LOWEWAYY oh there's no problem, there's still a TON of differences
Looks good! looks a bit like a planned variation I called the Hornisse
@LOWEWAYY sure! just don't forget to credit me :)
@DJS8Corporations for some reason it doesn't notify me when I get messages anymore, I do buildings of aircraft.
@DJS8Corporations I do, although not super commonly, I'm trying to work it more into my schedule, actually I may decide to stream simpleplanes in a bit.
@Vidal99977 @DJS8Corporations Thank you :)
@Shootingstar07 yeah that was the half point docker and what really confused me, in the screenshot it was really good, but in PC flight it was super reflective,
Absolutely fantastic work!
@PlayingSimple yeah I have no idea why multiplayer was crashing, that was super odd..
@LancasterAce @ColonelStriker @hopotumon @squideater56 @Pilothouston5 @Jurassicty060 @poopatron71 @MarshallLewisAerospace @PapaFoxtrotA51 @Shootingstar07 @GhostHTX @Geckoplane5 @ND40X @ProjectTank @greasytortle @Texasfam04
+1The challenge has officially concluded with the judging of the aircraft: the results are here
.
final score: 56/60
+1@GhostHTX had to update it abit, I missed something.
@Texasfam04 hey any time! I can't wait until I make a new challenge, everyone brought something interesting to the table. and on the extensions, there will never be an issue if anyone needs one, I understand life happens.
.
final score: 55/60
+1.
final score: 42/60
.
final score: 50.5/60
final score: 54/60
@FlipposMC This is really difficult lol, had to modify the car I wanted to use a few times, and still can't get it.
@FlipposMC absolutely will do! https://www.twitch.tv/legna_k I might be starting in about an hour and a half tops
mind if I do a live stream trying to complete this?