29.6k LegnaK Comments

  • Blackburn Basilisk B.1 Strategic Bomber Challenge 5.9 years ago

    Handling, stability, agility: 10/10 - incredibly stable, handles like a charm, and not very agile like a true bomber fasion.
    
    Realistic model and behavior: 10/10 - very responsive and docile, this aircraft has great bomber characteristics.
    
    Details, paint and other: 10/10 - practically flawless detailing, the Anti-flash white and roundels make this a very desirable nuclear bomber look along with the paneling and other markings the Blackburn Basilisk is very cleanly designed.
    
    Build quality: 11/10 - no flaws seen here, the aircraft is well designed and functions amazingly. An extra point has been given for a nicely designed cockpit I accidentally overlooked. 
    
    Personal impression: 10/10 - the Blackburn Basilisk caught my attention instantly, and with the design, flight characteristic, and history it fully deserves the 10/10.
    
    Description: 10/10 - Very nicely fleshed out in terms of the history, it kinda makes me sad that it had the fate it did in the alternate history. 
    

    Final Score: 61/60

    +2
  • AC500 "Patriot" Bomber 5.9 years ago

    Handling, stability, agility: 3/10 - this plane is incredibly tough to keep level outside of autopilot. The AC500 Patriot rolls FAR too well for its own good.
    
    Realistic model and behavior: 2/10 - Very unresponsive upon take-off, the aircraft has issues with any kind of pitch and roll.
    
    Details, paint and other: 2/10 - it's very monochromatic and difficult to even see the cockpit.
    
    Build quality: 4/10 - overall I feel the aircraft had potential, however, it needs more effort put into it.
    
    Personal impression: 3/10 - this plane was just far too unstable for me to enjoy it... sorry.
    
    Description: 5/10 - Not really much to go on here.
    

    Final Score: 19/60

  • Marshall-Lewis B-95 Phoenix Bomber Submission 5.9 years ago

    Handling, stability, agility: 4/10 - the Marshall-Lewis B-95 Phoenix Bomber has a really high pitch rate, the speed also exceeds the maximum speed for the challenge which severly knocks the score rating down a bit.
    
    Realistic model and behavior: 4/10 - As mentioned before the pitch and speed are incredibly high, paired with the issue of a natural tendancy to pitch downwards makes this plane rather unsuitable for flight.
    
    Details, paint and other: 6/10 - while I do very much enjoy the XB-70 esque white and black, paired with some roundels, I feel more could have been done, and the  orange of the inlets seem to be an oversight.
    
    Build quality: 6/10 - It has potential, however the aircraft often explodes without warning, deploying the missiles also causes the aircraft to explode. outside the fact the aircraft is a big Micheal Bay fan, I feel this planes physical appearance makes up a little for these issues.
    
    Personal impression: 5/10 - the Marshall-Lewis B-95 Phoenix seems to be fun to fly aside from the aformentioned issues. however, those issues REALLY hider my enjoyment of the aircraft.
    
    Description: 10/10 - Very nicely fleshed out in terms of the history and other data!
    

    Final Score: 35/60

  • Sodsworth XV-800 5.9 years ago

    Handling, stability, agility: 9.5/10 - my absolute only problem with the Sodsworth XV-800 is that it rolls a heap, although it's not enough to take a full point away. 
    
    Realistic model and behavior: 10/10 - the Sodsworth XV-800 flies very nice and its docile behavior makes it very admirable.
    
    Details, paint and other: 10/10 - very nicely built, well fleshed, and great detailing. I love it.
    
    Build quality: 10/10 - no flaws seen here, the aircraft is well designed and functions amazingly.
    
    Personal impression: 10/10 - the Sodsworth XV-800 immediately caught my attention with it's detail and design, and kept me here with its performance.
    
    Description: 8/10 - there's a valid history to the aircraft, although I feel a little more could have been put into it.
    

    Final Score: 57.5/60

  • B-49 tactical recon fighter bomber 5.9 years ago

    Handling, stability, agility: 4/10 - it's very back heavy and unstable, rolling causis a lot of tremors in the aircraft and stalling issues.

    Realistic model and behavior: 3/10 - the B-49 actually has trouble flying in general, and flight behavior is very unruly.

    Details, paint and other: 2/10 - very bare green with no detailing.

    Build quality: 6/10 - it's not bad for just using block parts. however...

    Personal impression: 4/10 - the aircraft just seemed... subpar due to the issues with said aircraft, I feel if it was an attack aircraft with upgrades it could have done much better.

    Description: 5/10 - there's a little bit of history, however that same history pegs it as pre cold war, which was the earliest for the challenge, which docks a point.

    Final score: 24/60

    +1
  • H-92 tactical cluster bomber 5.9 years ago

    Handling, stability, agility: 8/10 - handles very nicely, however it rolls too well for a large bomber. it's modest speed actually works well with its pitch though.

    Realistic model and behavior: 6/10 - one main issue is the wings tend to try and bend, on top of that, the plane seems a little too blocky to be something that can be reasonably used.

    Details, paint and other: 2/10 - it seems a little barren when it comes to detail.

    Build quality: 4/10 - very clunky, the bomb bay is partially there, but nothing to guard the bombs, the aircraft seems to be high in drag.

    Personal impression: 7/10 - aside from all the issues this plane has, it was actually fun to fly, the bomb dispersial was a neat trick, however I had to ditch the plane as it made it to its target but not back due to fuel issues.

    Description: 2/10 - no real history of the aircraft, just basic what it does.

    Final score: 29/60

    +1
  • BLACK OWL STRATEGIC BOMBER 5.9 years ago

    Handling, stability, agility: 5/10 - Rolls far too quickly and the afterburner speed well exceeds the speed limit for the challenge, which really docks a number off the aircraft.

    Realistic model and behavior: 7/10 - Aside from the rolling issue, the Black owl actually handles nicely, especially with the rarely seen vector nozzles.

    Details, paint and other: 3/10 - There's not much in the market in terms of design, it's solid black with no distinctive markings.

    Build quality: 5/10 - Overall, the aircraft is a solid design, however, it is visibly clunky with a lot of items protruding from the aircraft, I think with a bit more work this thing could easily be a solid 8 at the least.

    Personal impression: 9/10 - I was very pleased with this aircraft in terms of ingenuity with its multi-role ability and VTOL capabilities!

    Description: 4/10 - there isn't much to go off of with the data, however there is still enough there to give some story to the aircraft.

    final score: 33/60

  • ABX-10 Flying Body Strategic Bomber 5.9 years ago

    Handling, stability, agility: 9/10 - I feel it rolls just a little too well? although not too much to dock a full point, however the other half comes from the issue that trim causes a roll.

    Realistic model and behavior: 9.5/10 - outside of the trim/roll issue? this aircraft flies very docile and is a overall grand aircraft to fly.

    Details, paint and other: 10/10 - The decals, markings, lights, and paneling all blend very nicely with the aircraft with nothing too distracting. fantastic work!

    Build quality: 10/10 - I normally say function over form, the ABX-10 nails both aspects near perfectly.

    Personal impression: 10/10 - everything about this aircraft is amazing, I don't know what else to say about it aside it's a masterpiece in my eyes.

    Description: 10/10 - very nicely detailed and fleshed out, feels like something that actually could happen.

    final score: 58.5/60

  • F-11D Scorpion (El Salvorco Del Mauno SF 108th outfit) 5.9 years ago

    @Shootingstar07 what do you mean by that?
    Edit: oh, no these are backstock aircraft I've had for a bit, I'm still judging, work has had me in a little more this week, but I promise everything will be done by Wednesday!

  • F/A-41N Voyager 5.9 years ago

    @SelectAKey Huh, I thought I had gotten rid of all of them, whoops :(

  • F/A-41N Voyager 5.9 years ago

    @CoolPeach yeah the engine area is just absolutely insane to do, I kinda just half-wit did it because i was getting frustrated with them myself lol.

  • F/A-41N Voyager 5.9 years ago

    @Shootingstar07 that actually looks pretty good ngl

  • F/A-41N Voyager 5.9 years ago

    @Shootingstar07 it was significantly more difficult that I anticipated.

  • L' otarie Mk.I (Nordenvok Royal Navy Camoflauge) 5.9 years ago

    @donald347 the air brakes are meant for the torpedo bombing only, and for the flaps, it's odd because it works for me just fine, but when I download it does do what you say... incredibly odd...

  • Fictional Strategic Bomber Challenge! -Challenged closed!- 5.9 years ago

    @LancasterAce @ColonelStriker @hopotumon @squideater56 @Pilothouston5 @Jurassicty060 @poopatron71 @MarshallLewisAerospace @PapaFoxtrotA51 @Shootingstar07 @GhostHTX @Geckoplane5 @ND40X @ProjectTank @greasytortle @Texasfam04

    Thank you all for participating! the challenge is now closed and now I will be judging! gimmie a few days for everything!

    +3
  • Peace Walker XB-75 5.9 years ago

    @Shootingstar07 absolutely!

    +1
  • Fictional Strategic Bomber Challenge! -Challenged closed!- 5.9 years ago

    @Shootingstar07 don't worry, I got a notification about it anyways :)
    @Texasfam04 no problem, if you need another week extension I can judge yours a whenever you're done :)

  • F-42 5.9 years ago

    @Heihachi No problem! It's a very nice aircraft!

    +1
  • Mark 39 Nuclear Bomb 5.9 years ago

    @Texasfam04 I would love to test this out in the Deltarrow once I get home :D

  • OA1 Sandgoblin 5.9 years ago

    Also, holy cow, I can't believe this thing is featured! O.O
    Thank you everyone!!!

  • OA1 Sandgoblin 5.9 years ago

    @JohnnyBoythePilot Thank you! I was really happy how this one came out, it was just initially a silly little project I was tinkering with, but I was really happy how it came out.

    +1
  • OA1 Sandgoblin 5.9 years ago

    @Texasfam04 Thank you!

  • Eagle Pass 5.9 years ago

    @AndrewGarrison can we please get another race soon?

    +1
  • Fairey Swordfish Mk.I F.A.A. [W.5856] 5.9 years ago

    Absolutely fantastic work! One of my all time favorite biplanes and you nailed it perfectly!

    +1
  • Rainier Enclosed Weapon Pods™ 5.9 years ago

    @JohnnyBoythePilot alrighty, well that's no problem, I was going to have to extend it to the first anyways as my job has been picking up and I've been only able to thoroughly judge like one bomber :/

  • Rainier Enclosed Weapon Pods™ 5.9 years ago

    Ooooh, I feel a couple upcoming birds of mine could benefit from these :D I'm definitely going to credit you!

  • Fictional Strategic Bomber Challenge! -Challenged closed!- 6.0 years ago

    @Texasfam04 Absolutely!

  • XQF-3912 Garrus 6.0 years ago

    @JohnnyBoythePilot Eventually they're all going into a War Thunder/Ace Combat-esque game. So it's just building the world for everyone really.

    +1
  • XQF-3912 Garrus 6.0 years ago

    @Texasfam04 thanks :D I'm actually really happy on how stable and reliable this aircraft is, I really wasn't expecting it to be so good initially.

    and @Treadmill103 Thank you!

  • J-016F Howaitorozu 6.0 years ago

    @Texasfam04 Yeah, that's one thing that really bothers me about this game, and that's why I don't often run external tanks. but I am glad you like the jet :D

  • Focke Wulf Fw 324 C-2/b 6.0 years ago

    It's been a while since I've seen you, nice aircraft friend :)

  • Blackburn Basilisk B.1 Strategic Bomber Challenge 6.0 years ago

    @GhostHTX no problem:) take your time.

    +1
  • Hildisvíni MK.VII Strategic bomber 6.0 years ago

    @DestinyAviation I kinda borrowed the canopy from the HP Victor actually lol, but this plane was inspired by the V bombers.

  • Hildisvíni MK.VII Strategic bomber 6.0 years ago

    @Tiseth Thank you! I can try and make a mobile friendly version, but I'm not sure how well that will work out.

  • Torpedoplane Challenge 6.0 years ago

    so, when you say no mods, does that mean no XML modding of the aircraft too?

  • A-10C ThunderBolt II 6.0 years ago

    Fantastic work!

  • Fictional Strategic Bomber Challenge! -Challenged closed!- 6.0 years ago

    @MarshallLewisAerospace yes, nations may be fictional, your best bet to make it a sucessor is remove the cockpit, make the entire aircraft a sub-assembly, download this one, remove all but the cockpit and put it on your pre-existing plane.

  • V-1 Flying Bomb 6.0 years ago

    Looks nice, but like, how is it featured so early on?

    +4
  • KA-209 Blitz 6.0 years ago

    @Texasfam04 thanks! I greatly appreciate that :)

  • KA-209 Blitz 6.0 years ago

    @Texasfam04 also, my plan is to have at least 2 a week.

  • KA-209 Blitz 6.0 years ago

    @Texasfam04 its only that way because I'm unable to get the guns to fire via Throttle :( but that's also why I developed it into a lift body design.

  • YB-16a Daedalus 6.0 years ago

    @ThomasRoderick Essentially yes, I plan on having a full history of this AU soon.

    +1
  • B-93 Deltarrow (Conventional bomb load) 6.0 years ago

    @ThomasRoderick that's where I got the basic design inspiration, but I had to freehand sketch the blueprints and I got this :)

    +1
  • Do-628 Wassermolch 6.0 years ago

    @ThomasRoderick vaguely based off of it, it's mainly an old design of mine I remastered yet never uploaded here, initially it was more inspired by the Do-217 line.

    +1
  • A-24 Razorback 6.0 years ago

    @ThomasRoderick It is a single engine build into the fusalage.

    +1
  • Fictional Strategic Bomber Challenge! -Challenged closed!- 6.0 years ago

    @PlanesOfOld either or works, that is completely up to you to decide, as long as it has bombs and a bomb bay :)

  • YB-16a Daedalus 6.1 years ago

    @jamesPLANESii yes, I also see what you were asking now, It was getting to the point it was starting to lag out my computer while making this plane so I had to cut corners sadly.