@Inuyasha8215 It wasn't a thought about choice, I just used the custom paint job @Junkers87 used.
Start using fuselage cylinders.
Try using the fuselage cylinders, instead of the blocks, you'll get a much better shape out of them.
One thing that you should start considering about Yaw, is that, it needs some sort of counter surface.
Add small surfaces to the normal wings that work like roll controls but respond to Yaw input.
@Kimfri yours is pretty good too.
You know that that gatling guns will go straight through the pilot, right?
Ditch the fuselage cubes, start to use fuselage blocks, you'll have more freedom of customization with them, you can even add fuel to them.
You can even smooth out the back of the cockpit.
Arsenal Bird with a touch of Horton 229?
Forget that the normal blocks exist.
Use just the Fuselage tubes.
@sauron2000111 Use the precision tool, turn the Fuselages 45 degrees left or right.
That looks more like F-35 on steroids.
"just wish they added 20mm and 30mm cannons :("
Bro, I'm with you.
Thanks mate, always thought Sky Park was a mod map before this!
"Be there or be square."
Regardless, its a pretty good plane with the little we have of a real reference.
@Graingy There's two other reasons for 47.
The USAF was born in 1947.
P-47 Thunderbolt was an excellent aircraft in WW2.
And yes, the 47th president is also a reason, because apparently, Trump was a key person in the making the F-47.
@Trainz448 Very smol indeed.
@Fastplen Yes... Because this is based on one of the prototypes for that plane.
Try remaking this with the fuselage cylinders.
You don't need 54 parts for this.
Could you turn this into a Swing wing aircraft?
Not the World of Tanks Blitz' crate.
Could you try using Fuselage Cylinders?
I bet this thing's part count would drop to sub 500.
@BRNavyPilot Yes, Stealth (2005)
Soviet Lightning?
If you hit her right, she goes at Mach Jesus.
Currently seeing her flying at 15k kph and 42km.
Finally, Simple Plane.
Looks great.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qT-NP5LYn2M
Could that name get any longer and meaningless?
Putting the Fat in Fat Amy.
You know the retardant tank is too big right?
The back wheels aren't touching the ground.
And none of the flare pads seen connected.
Question, should it really lose control while taking off?
It really wants to go right even after the back well comes off from the ground.
Found the issue, put the back wheel at X -0.2650, and it will go straight.
Sad that you didn't make water landable.
@SPTNR Because Monarchii did the best good job with just 10 parts?
What is this brainrot.
@BaconAircraft is there a way to link this plane (https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/V16VR5/F98) as a predecessor to my plane?
Hi, would this work? https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/OHpOC6/East-German-Flagon
This twisted game needs to be reset.
@Luminaria Thanks
Looks cute.
Who's that on the UFP?
@ReynaldoIndustries what I meant it that looks like a Mig-31 body with F-15 wings.
Predecessor means it came before.
Sucessor means it came after.
Heads-up, recheck the rotators in the control surfaces.
While pitching, the canards are going the wrong way.
While rolling, the canards are going the same way.
Please, start learning how to use fuselage cylinders.
I see now, he switched visibleInDesigner= to false in the xml file
How did you do that with the 3 view image screen?
Is it me, or is one of the wings more swept back?
Also, start using the fuselage cylinders.
@sussybaka98198 Yeah, maybe this name has aged a bit badly.
It was more like Ursa Minor you know.
I have a F-16 in 16 Parts, I have a parasite plane in 10 parts, and another low part aircraft with 8 parts.
@Inuyasha8215 It wasn't a thought about choice, I just used the custom paint job @Junkers87 used.
+1Start using fuselage cylinders.
+1Try using the fuselage cylinders, instead of the blocks, you'll get a much better shape out of them.
+1One thing that you should start considering about Yaw, is that, it needs some sort of counter surface.
Add small surfaces to the normal wings that work like roll controls but respond to Yaw input.
+1@Kimfri yours is pretty good too.
+1You know that that gatling guns will go straight through the pilot, right?
+1Ditch the fuselage cubes, start to use fuselage blocks, you'll have more freedom of customization with them, you can even add fuel to them.
You can even smooth out the back of the cockpit.
+1Arsenal Bird with a touch of Horton 229?
+1Forget that the normal blocks exist.
Use just the Fuselage tubes.
+1@sauron2000111 Use the precision tool, turn the Fuselages 45 degrees left or right.
+1That looks more like F-35 on steroids.
+1"just wish they added 20mm and 30mm cannons :("
Bro, I'm with you.
+1Thanks mate, always thought Sky Park was a mod map before this!
+1"Be there or be square."
Regardless, its a pretty good plane with the little we have of a real reference.
@Graingy There's two other reasons for 47.
The USAF was born in 1947.
P-47 Thunderbolt was an excellent aircraft in WW2.
And yes, the 47th president is also a reason, because apparently, Trump was a key person in the making the F-47.
@Trainz448 Very smol indeed.
@Fastplen Yes... Because this is based on one of the prototypes for that plane.
Try remaking this with the fuselage cylinders.
You don't need 54 parts for this.
Could you turn this into a Swing wing aircraft?
Not the World of Tanks Blitz' crate.
Could you try using Fuselage Cylinders?
I bet this thing's part count would drop to sub 500.
@BRNavyPilot Yes, Stealth (2005)
Soviet Lightning?
If you hit her right, she goes at Mach Jesus.
Currently seeing her flying at 15k kph and 42km.
Finally, Simple Plane.
Looks great.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qT-NP5LYn2M
Could that name get any longer and meaningless?
Putting the Fat in Fat Amy.
You know the retardant tank is too big right?
The back wheels aren't touching the ground.
And none of the flare pads seen connected.
Question, should it really lose control while taking off?
It really wants to go right even after the back well comes off from the ground.
Found the issue, put the back wheel at X -0.2650, and it will go straight.
Sad that you didn't make water landable.
@SPTNR Because Monarchii did the best good job with just 10 parts?
What is this brainrot.
@BaconAircraft is there a way to link this plane (https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/V16VR5/F98) as a predecessor to my plane?
Hi, would this work?
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/OHpOC6/East-German-Flagon
This twisted game needs to be reset.
@Luminaria Thanks
Looks cute.
Who's that on the UFP?
@ReynaldoIndustries what I meant it that looks like a Mig-31 body with F-15 wings.
Predecessor means it came before.
Sucessor means it came after.
Heads-up, recheck the rotators in the control surfaces.
While pitching, the canards are going the wrong way.
While rolling, the canards are going the same way.
Please, start learning how to use fuselage cylinders.
I see now, he switched visibleInDesigner= to false in the xml file
How did you do that with the 3 view image screen?
Is it me, or is one of the wings more swept back?
Also, start using the fuselage cylinders.
@sussybaka98198 Yeah, maybe this name has aged a bit badly.
It was more like Ursa Minor you know.
I have a F-16 in 16 Parts, I have a parasite plane in 10 parts, and another low part aircraft with 8 parts.