21.0k LieutenantSOT Comments

  • This Aeroplane Goes Far, man. [FINAL TEASER] 1.6 years ago

    My laptop and phone take terrible images from the game, but I promise it looks a lot better lol, I also still have a bunch of stuff to do that will make it look significantly better
    .
    Also, if anyone has ideas for the paint I will gratefully take some lol, because this was the only one I could get to look well. I might add mini french banners down the main wing

  • The Crapper 1.6 years ago

    oh shitttttt

  • egg bus e380 1.6 years ago

    Y'know, if you're going to steal, at least make it look believable. You didn't even do a custom thumbnail, you only changed the paint scheme... I normally wouldn't care if you only did it to me, but these are other people's hard-worked for builds, even the part counts are the same

  • egg bus e380 1.6 years ago

    And another...

  • Glideee Jet 1.6 years ago

    Wow, another stolen build...

  • Cessna 337 sky master 1.6 years ago

    @TheFlightGuySP thanks mate
    .
    Hey, I think it's cool you wanted to modify my build, but you make no claim that it was mine, and you made it a direct successor (I mean really, if you're going to steal, do it right lol). Sorry mate but I don't give permission for this. Thanks for saying I paid this much attention to detail though

  • Guess The Aircraft | Berlin Bomber Mk.I [Teaser] 1.6 years ago

    @Anomalocaris nope! Really good guess though

  • Larger than the Peacemaker 1.6 years ago

    Hefty payload for an underpowered beast XD
    Cyclones!? Those are an interesting choice. I'd love to see her done though! T!

  • Guess The Aircraft | Berlin Bomber Mk.I [Teaser] 1.6 years ago

    Dear god these struts are hell
    .
    Also, two things:
    1. Yes, I am actually posting this and not just teasing a never-completed build
    2. T for tag!

  • Weird bouncing wheels 1.6 years ago

    You need more mass on the rotator and the parts of the landing gear, but before all of that, add mass to the wheels themselves, that usually helps!

  • The Second American Civil War 1.6 years ago

    Anyways, sorry 😂

  • Joint Strike Air Program | CHALLENGE 1.6 years ago

    This is perfect! I might have issues reaching the deadline, as I have one more project before I would start on this, but I think I could do it!
    All the weapons being internalized will be fascinating to do for this... but I can manage!

  • bristol f2b 1.6 years ago

    This is an amazing plane!!

  • AI Image Generation Challenge (Closed! Thank you all participants.) 1.6 years ago

    I asked ChatGPT to describe to me a unique air superiority aircraft and it gave me a really cool idea, but its not an image... is this okay?

  • A Juicy Update w/ ESA for Juno: New Origins 1.6 years ago

    @Planebuilder2123 @crazyplaness
    I entirely agree, but that drastic of changes require an entirely new game to be made, which, alas, takes time and money

  • A Juicy Update w/ ESA for Juno: New Origins 1.6 years ago

    This is absolutely amazing, Andrew, but now begs the questions as to what development will do here :(

  • All Fictional nations, ASSEMBLE! 1.6 years ago

    @Yourlocalhuman okay! Sweet!

  • All Fictional nations, ASSEMBLE! 1.6 years ago

    I feel that if you want participation in these challenges, you should make unlisted challenges and tag the members of this on it, because I had no clue they were happening

  • p-95 1.6 years ago

    @Planebuilder2123 yeah lol 😂
    Aleph Null is the smallest value of infinity, recognizing every possible cardinal number that we don't even know yet. So if you post that many planes, I will give you rhe same number of upvotes

  • p-95 1.6 years ago

    Yeah, you're entirely right (no offense, of course). The plane looks meh, but I made this grading chart as a means of whether you can go towards specifications, and you did it! The grade was mostly that, which is now making me realize my grading scale is poorly reflecting this challenge. I think I'm going to make a new one that's more streamlined with like 3 sections that makes it easier for me to grade, and more accurate to take into account the specifications, but also make it harder/easier to get in the ranks and make the numbers more different from each other

  • p-95 1.6 years ago

    Alrighty mate, here's the time for your grade!
    As with everyone else, these are subject to change, and I will say why I graded it what way after the score
    .
    Speed: 7/10
    Maneuver: 9/10
    Realism: 13/15
    Requirements: 25/30
    Carrier: 15/15
    Tactical: 10/10
    Looks: 3.5/5
    Opinion: 4/5
    Total: 86.5/100

  • Sukhoi I-240 "Chush" 1.6 years ago

    @WinsWings Thank you for the advice! I appreciate it! Yeahhh I was confused on how to get the front seat lower as it already was a little low, and the back seat wouldn't have been able to go any more up. Thank you again!

  • Nakajima Ki-202 Goryo 1.6 years ago

    @Jabuticaba23 yeah! Sorry, I've been a little overwhelmed with school but I'll get to it shortly! Hopefully tonight or more likely tomorrow, for real this time

  • Cold War Challenge - 50-450 parts (CLOSED) 1.7 years ago

    Ope, you deleted your comment

  • Sukhoi I-240 "Chush" 1.7 years ago

    But thank you dude!

  • Sukhoi I-240 "Chush" 1.7 years ago

    @ZeroWithSlashedO I can't tell how to read this 😂
    .
    Either unamused, fascinated, or utter "what the ever loving f* am I looking at?"

  • Sukhoi I-240 "Chush" 1.7 years ago

    @Rexzion
    @Kangy
    .
    Here's a swept-wing for y'all. Is it good enough?
    (Don't mind the auto-roll...)

  • Coming soon of Fokker 100 | Is coming now! 1.7 years ago

    motherfokker...

  • I Have A Complaint About Dogfights In This Game 1.7 years ago

    @Inuyasha8215 damn lmao

  • I Have A Complaint About Dogfights In This Game 1.7 years ago

    @Blb1981 what CL125 said

  • p-95 1.7 years ago

    As it is the same build revamped, I will just omit this plane, and make that one the "true" plane. If you upload an entirely new aircraft I will give you a second score

  • p-95 1.7 years ago

    @Planebuilder2123 I never said you couldn't... ;p
    .
    You have as many uploads as you want!!

  • p-95 1.7 years ago

    Alrighty mate, here's the time for your grade!
    As with everyone else, these are subject to change, and I will say why I graded it what way after the score
    .
    Speed: 7/10
    Maneuver: 9/10
    Realism: 13/15
    Requirements: 25/30
    Carrier: 15/15
    Tactical: 9/10
    Looks: 3/5
    Opinion: 4/5
    Total: 85/100


    It was pretty nice in terms of speed! A wee bit slow, but hey its okay! I did deduct points because the minimum speed was 400 knots, but its okay!
    That maneuverability... my lordy it was smooth XD. The pitch fought me sometimes though, but I got it to work in the end
    Realistically, this aircraft is really good! I like the design, the thrust is realistic to the era enough, realistically the engines are still too powerful, but y'know what, I made a rule where you could, so I won't argue lol
    The requirements are all splendid, minus the underspeed
    Carrier is probably the smoothest of all the aircraft thus far lol
    Tactically it is great! The armament is powerful, and the bombs are good! But I've found them rather inadequate, actually. I did allow up to 2000 lbs per bomb, so you could have increased them, but its okay! They still worked great
    Looks-wise, of the three approved entries, I marked this 2nd place, obviously the propfan looks the most amazing, like dear god I can't even make a plane look that good, but this plane is really nice!! I just wish it had some markings on it, even text ones
    And my opinion, this plane is dope! I love it! I flew around and messed around. I originally planned on my tests being structured and stuff, but they mostly are just me blowing random things up, doing something structured, and then bombing something else. This plane took care of the USS Tiny well lol, and handled a few stop and go landings. All in all, a great contender! This is second place so far!! Thanks for your entry mate!

  • p-95 1.7 years ago

    Oh and... ahem
    .

    Approved

  • p-95 1.7 years ago

    Cool!! I'll check her out in a wee bit, mate!

  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Planebuilder2123 lmao

  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 1.7 years ago

    And yep! You got me lmao. You definitely learned my style

  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 1.7 years ago

    Also, forgot to add this, and I am so sorry I'm filling up your comment section lol, I'll delete some of these if you want to, but I loved the cockpit and all the little details, its awesome!

  • GP-230 Knucker 1.7 years ago

    @Geekpride Apologies for the delay, I just returned home
    .
    Ofc!! Its all good, dude!! Hey, that's fair! You made a great aircraft for the challenge and I appreciate that!
    Sick!! Please do! I'd love to see it! And in the future if you ever want tips or helps building just lmk, I am always here. You could tag me on an unlisted or whatever lol

  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    I feel like the grades are really close to each other XD
    I intentionally made it so that the big part is meeting the requirements, but I will absolutely give planes that look better and function better or have cool things more points, and if necessary, I might start adding bonus points!

  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 1.7 years ago

    I try getting the test done asap so my lazy ass doesn't postpone it and so you don't have to wait XD

  • GP-230 Knucker 1.7 years ago

    And at this moment, you are #1 on the leaderboard that is invisible! Wahoo! And the first accepted entry

  • GP-230 Knucker 1.7 years ago

    Alright, now for your score:
    .
    Speed: 7/10
    Maneuverability: 5/10
    Realism: 8/15
    Requirements: 29/30
    Carrier Operation: 10/15
    Tactical: 8/10
    Looks: 2/5
    My Opinion: 3/5
    Total: 72/100
    .
    Now, my reasoning:
    The speed was okay, but I feel like it was a bit underpowered with the piston engine, and the prop is pretty small in comparison to the aircraft itself
    The maneuverability is decent, but the aircraft has no trim or flaps to help, which I'll get back to in a second
    Realistically, this aircraft would probably be horrible in most situations, especially as a fighter, although, this plane does look pretty badass and I like that!
    Requirements-wise, I do not see anything wrong! I only deduct one point because I feel like the propeller should be larger, and the landing gear are a tad short, but still functional
    Carrier-wise, everything is okay, but it is impossible to land without airbrakes, or flaps to aid in deceleration, because no matter what the aircraft either stalls and then slams down, or it brakes so hard that it nose dives once the hook catches and blows up
    Tactically, it would work well! You can attach bombs, I really like how you made it optional, I find that really cool, and the guns are nice! The 8x .50 cal machine guns were pretty underpowering in my tests though
    Looks-wise, as much as I like the design, and I'm sorry to say this, but it is pretty gnarly-looking construction-wise. I feel like the fuselage wings and the lack of fuselage-based control surfaces look weird, and the gap between the body of the wing and rotator looks a little weird too. Sorry, I don't mean to dig into you on that, but it's part of the grade so I have to say it. This is definitely an amazing build though!
    And finally, my opinion. I feel like this aircraft has a ton of potential! I feel like the design is really cool and honestly I'd love to draw it and build it myself, because damn this is a cool idea.
    .
    Man, I'm sorry. I suck at criticism lol. I love your build, but it's part of the grading scale so I have to do it, and I'd at least rather have you know why. And just a note, you grade most likely will change as more aircraft enter the challenge, either better or worse, as I get more to compare it to.

  • GP-230 Knucker 1.7 years ago

    After careful consideration, this is the first accepted aircraft to the challenge!!
    .

    APPROVED

  • Definitely not Concorde 1.7 years ago

    T!

  • Single Engine YF-23 :/ [TEASER] 1.7 years ago

    Anyways, this was sick dude!!!
    And I think it was deleted by the poster

  • Single Engine YF-23 :/ [TEASER] 1.7 years ago

    @Serge7Lucas @ronald76tolkien even bigger noobs
    Y'all are a plague, I swear

  • Single Engine YF-23 :/ [TEASER] 1.7 years ago

    @DiannHerrera @jeniferdaniels @ericchristtian noob, noob, noob

  • I got simple planes on Steam now! thanks autumn sale! 1.7 years ago

    @jeniferdaniels noob