@ToffieToffe Part count on this plane is interesting since it uses mods. Without mods, the part count would be upward of 30,000, and with mods, it's 3000.
I have one of the best computers money can buy, with an overclocked i9-11900k. Even with that, I barely hold 30FPS with the entire plane.
@Stephengraffam221022222 I'm not sure when the plane is coming out, I mention a possible release date in every progress update forum I make.
There will be two versions, mods and no mods.
@Sense2 The file I have in SP is 2000 however due to modding there is the equivalent of over 24000 parts in 3D models, with additional complex meshes that were 3D modelled externally.
@BaconX69 @Sense2 This is a 24000 part plane with many more equivalent parts in 3D models. It's modded to be 800 parts for the entire plane and 2000 parts for the cockpit (with lots of variables).
I have put lots of effort into making a no mods cargo version with the same cockpit.
@N0ble I've somewhat recently learned that modern planes even have this kind of system, and I have been considering it. I'm not entirely sure. Currently it just has the basic input = output control (with manual trim).
Even though it looks like it's done, the SWL-120 is nowhere near complete.
Some things I need to do (these will take at least a few months) include:
- Landing gear
- Redesign tail section
- Redesign interior (ceiling and some scaling issues)
- Engine code
- Engine sound fx
- Liveries
- Autopilot panel
- Navigation system and integration with FMC
- EICAS and other screens
- Everything on the Snakepad
- Technical manual and other documentation
- Cockpit details
- Code and variable efficiency improvements
- Random bugfixes
I have both, and I strongly prefer SP. The main points are the designer and VR. I find the SR2 designer difficult to use, and it has no VR. In addition, the connection system is really confusing. I don't understand why you can't just have all connection points the same.
That being said, I have spent some time building and flying rockets. If you like flying rocket related crafts, I'd say go for it, however in my opinion, SP is still the best game for designing, coding, and flying planes.
@Majakalona Jundroo would not be making much money if they only worked on SP, and would eventually run out of money, not even enough money to run SimplePlanes.com. Do you really want that?
@13 @Idksus @PannerTerkins
The reason nothing is able to be published is because of a bug with the website. Whenever this happens, the developers fix it within a day.
@ShinyGemsBro It appears to be a publishing bug, which has happened several times before. In fact, other users are reporting it too.
The best solution is to let the devs know and wait.
@windshifter1 From my knowledge of variables and control bases, you might be able to do something with a "floppy" control base (look up control bases in SimpleCheats, I already have a working floppy/rotating combo control base), where you do something with a control base and a spring outputting its compression to the control base. I'm not sure if that makes sense or will work, but it's an idea.
@TinyMaus I think I'm actually going to release a no mods version of each detailed part. That way people with "lower end devices" (literally everyone) can fully appreciate the effort I put in.
@jamesPLANESii That's alright, just wondering.
Thank you again.
@jamesPLANESii Hi, just wondering if you've have a chance to look for the mod?
@ToffieToffe Part count on this plane is interesting since it uses mods. Without mods, the part count would be upward of 30,000, and with mods, it's 3000.
+2I have one of the best computers money can buy, with an overclocked i9-11900k. Even with that, I barely hold 30FPS with the entire plane.
@BeechcraftA35 Instead of an easy mode, there is an autostart button in the FMC.
@Nimetx No, I commented before it was published
Here
@Stephengraffam221022222 That is a planned feature in the FMC.
@Stephengraffam221022222 I'm not sure when the plane is coming out, I mention a possible release date in every progress update forum I make.
There will be two versions, mods and no mods.
@MRFOXY09 I'm not sure what you mean by "can I have a livery", but there are several planned liveries for the SWL-120.
@TinyMaus Hopefully... or next year...
@N0ble I am not sure what I'm looking at and that is not how you do it. Simply do clamp01(Roll + Brake) and then invert roll for the other side.
@starmango Not sure, probably mid or late next year.
@Majakalona @DatMaluchGuy19 I would assume they will fix critical bugs, however SP is simply not as profitable as it once was.
+1@Sense2 The file I have in SP is 2000 however due to modding there is the equivalent of over 24000 parts in 3D models, with additional complex meshes that were 3D modelled externally.
The reason nothing is able to be published is because of a bug with the website. Whenever this happens, the developers fix it within a day.
The reason nothing is able to be published is because of a bug with the website. Whenever this happens, the developers fix it within a day.
@BaconX69 @Sense2 This is a 24000 part plane with many more equivalent parts in 3D models. It's modded to be 800 parts for the entire plane and 2000 parts for the cockpit (with lots of variables).
I have put lots of effort into making a no mods cargo version with the same cockpit.
I am a time traveler.
The reason nothing is able to be published is because of a bug with the website. Whenever this happens, the developers usually fix it within a day.
@N0ble I've somewhat recently learned that modern planes even have this kind of system, and I have been considering it. I'm not entirely sure. Currently it just has the basic input = output control (with manual trim).
@TinyMaus Almost all planes have a ram air turbine, which is used as an emergency generator.
Even though it looks like it's done, the SWL-120 is nowhere near complete.
Some things I need to do (these will take at least a few months) include:
- Landing gear
- Redesign tail section
- Redesign interior (ceiling and some scaling issues)
- Engine code
- Engine sound fx
- Liveries
- Autopilot panel
- Navigation system and integration with FMC
- EICAS and other screens
- Everything on the Snakepad
- Technical manual and other documentation
- Cockpit details
- Code and variable efficiency improvements
- Random bugfixes
@SILVERPANZER @HuskyDynamics01 I've been working on one plane for 2 years. I post teasers about every month or so.
+4@TinyMaus
Possibly. I'm thinking of releasing certain aircraft parts separately (and before others), so people with low-end devices can run them.
I have both, and I strongly prefer SP. The main points are the designer and VR. I find the SR2 designer difficult to use, and it has no VR. In addition, the connection system is really confusing. I don't understand why you can't just have all connection points the same.
+5That being said, I have spent some time building and flying rockets. If you like flying rocket related crafts, I'd say go for it, however in my opinion, SP is still the best game for designing, coding, and flying planes.
@Numbers2 Possibly.
@Majakalona Jundroo would not be making much money if they only worked on SP, and would eventually run out of money, not even enough money to run SimplePlanes.com. Do you really want that?
+1The reason nothing is able to be published is because of a bug with the website. Whenever this happens, the developers fix it within a day.
@windshifter1 Second question can be answered by setting
partCollisionResponsetodisconnectOnly.@13 @Idksus @PannerTerkins
+2The reason nothing is able to be published is because of a bug with the website. Whenever this happens, the developers fix it within a day.
The reason nothing is able to be published is because of a bug with the website. Whenever this happens, the developers fix it within a day.
+2@ShinyGemsBro It appears to be a publishing bug, which has happened several times before. In fact, other users are reporting it too.
The best solution is to let the devs know and wait.
Click on the file.
+1It will open the game and download the plane.
@windshifter1 I meant SimpleCheatsII
@windshifter1 From my knowledge of variables and control bases, you might be able to do something with a "floppy" control base (look up control bases in SimpleCheats, I already have a working floppy/rotating combo control base), where you do something with a control base and a spring outputting its compression to the control base. I'm not sure if that makes sense or will work, but it's an idea.
@Commander9013 No problem!
@Commander9013 I'm on 59.21.48.116.
Also, remember to restart SP before trying a new server. idk why, but you have to do this.
@Commander9013 I'll join MP so you can see if the servers are simply empty.
100% yes. I used to be an iOS player and I could never EVER go back.
+2adjust the scale of the label using overload
+1It's important to use the scale attribute instead of the font size for this label.
@TinyMaus I think I'm actually going to release a no mods version of each detailed part. That way people with "lower end devices" (literally everyone) can fully appreciate the effort I put in.
INSERT Bye INTO Comments;
@BeechcraftA35 err04: comment [inser]exe.c not found error
die (help);
er fail
@BeechcraftA35 SELECT * FROM Words WHERE Word = "yes" OR Word = "Yes";
Return ERROR("Yes" was not found.);
@BeechcraftA35 no
@BeechcraftA35 YesYesYes@BeechcraftA35 @BeechcraftA35
@BeechcraftA35 Yes
@BeechcraftA35 Yes
@BeechcraftA35 Yes
I can help, but in a few days as I'm quite busy IRL
+1