@EdamCheese6 Mine actually isn't working that well. I can't enter a number less than 10000 because the number entry system goes from left to right and doesn't accept the first number being a 0. Also there are a few other bugs.
.
When I post any teasers using this new system (and the plane itself), I will be sure to credit you.
@BeastHunter Yeah I myself sometimes want a big 'turn it all on' switch for when I want to test something. It's a little annoying sometimes to go through a 20 minute startup sequence just to notice you need to make a small edit to the autopilot code.
.
So yes, I will make a version with a big fat switch to turn it all on.
@SupremeDorian Ermm... the rules link is broken. It should be https://simpleplanes.com/About/Rules, not https://simpleplanes.com/rules. Just wanted to let you know!
@Dathcha I was actually trying to figure out if BodganX had a picture in his bio that wasn't showing up. When looking at the source code, I noticed the code for the report function, and noticed the incorrect spelling.
@dINE I actually can't access fuel from tanks, I can just do pretend things. Like imagine the cross feed is always open. Using way too much FT I can write some code which makes engines shut off if certain pretend tank levels are empty.
And about the fuel consumption - not a problem. I can just grab a stock engine and have that nudged inside these engines. I'd rather have a working fuel indicator with no fuel consumption than no working fuel indicator with fuel consumption.
Exception quality for someone of your points. I would recommend turning off the auto centre on the cameras because I couldn't look around in the cockpit (i.e. to click controls). Great use of the craft instructions page, and overall a pretty good plane.
@TatsuTheOtaku Thanks! It's a 787-767 blend nose, (four windows), 787 landing gear, 767-737 wings (winglets), and the tail doesn't exist (yet). It's actual name is SWL-120.
@Graingy Yeah something like that. Also due to me trying to divide a fuselage (different front and back sizes) into a number of smaller ones that perfectly match the original (so I could have some cutouts for door hinges). The math was perfect, but the fuselages just didn't match. There were also some other issues related to that but it's been over a year and I don't remember the details.
@Graingy I did some calculations for fuselages that were mathematically correct. When I entered those numbers into the fuselages, they were not correct. This is due to SP meshes being weird.
@Graingy Math said some fuselages for the nose gear bay were perfect, but due to SP geometry being SP geometry they weren't. I couldn't fix it so I gave up and 3D modelled it.
@BluesynVN I can't lol I used the mods one for the screenshots. I get 10FPS in the designer with the 17k version and it takes 30 seconds to do anything.
If you want a FA-18C, check out this post.
+2It needs to be a boolean.
+2EjectionAct > 0
@BaconEggs Ok.
+2.
Great plane, and I really like the use of the variables system for things like the engine startup and similar. Fun lil thing to fly.
@Kakhikotchauri1 I've uploaded them to Google Drive, [link removed].
+2.
Please let me know when you have downloaded them, so I can delete them.
@EdamCheese6 Mine actually isn't working that well. I can't enter a number less than 10000 because the number entry system goes from left to right and doesn't accept the first number being a 0. Also there are a few other bugs.
+2.
When I post any teasers using this new system (and the plane itself), I will be sure to credit you.
@MOPCKOEDNISHE Ok, I understand
+2I have created a slight modification which adds a switch to power a "starter motor".
+2You can get it here
Oh my god this is huge...
+2@Boelin That was the general idea, to create a plane with all the realistic complicated systems, and a realistic startup sequence.
+2Very nice for a first build!
+2Ah, easy.
+2Build the gear system you described.
Ensure the speed of the door rotators is 50%.
I have the codes somewhere, I'll get them in a bit.
@BeastHunter Yeah I myself sometimes want a big 'turn it all on' switch for when I want to test something. It's a little annoying sometimes to go through a 20 minute startup sequence just to notice you need to make a small edit to the autopilot code.
+2.
So yes, I will make a version with a big fat switch to turn it all on.
@SupremeDorian Ermm... the rules link is broken. It should be https://simpleplanes.com/About/Rules, not https://simpleplanes.com/rules. Just wanted to let you know!
+2@Dathcha I was actually trying to figure out if BodganX had a picture in his bio that wasn't showing up. When looking at the source code, I noticed the code for the report function, and noticed the incorrect spelling.
+2My gaming channel has an intro, but it's only like 10 seconds long.
+2@dINE I actually can't access fuel from tanks, I can just do pretend things. Like imagine the cross feed is always open. Using way too much FT I can write some code which makes engines shut off if certain pretend tank levels are empty.
+2@Bellcat The real problem is he used the HUD without credit at all.
+2Presses undo
+2Video ends
@MOPCKOEDNISHE Thank you!
And about the fuel consumption - not a problem. I can just grab a stock engine and have that nudged inside these engines. I'd rather have a working fuel indicator with no fuel consumption than no working fuel indicator with fuel consumption.
+2This is the best
+2In terms of detail, this is the best
There is a way to create folders yourself using xml, but the original forum got deleted.
+2Exception quality for someone of your points. I would recommend turning off the auto centre on the cameras because I couldn't look around in the cockpit (i.e. to click controls). Great use of the craft instructions page, and overall a pretty good plane.
+2What happened to the other 230974230452987540235728203475023 builds you made a teaser of?
+2You just emulated a normal screen in a VR room, and ran normal SP.
+2I'm going to tell your great-great-great-grandkids that this was the 747.
+2@TatsuTheOtaku Thanks! It's a 787-767 blend nose, (four windows), 787 landing gear, 767-737 wings (winglets), and the tail doesn't exist (yet). It's actual name is SWL-120.
+2@KLM_747 I'm stuck on a 2.2 Ghz i7-8750H 8th gen laptop... with GTX 1050 4GB...
+2Please fix this mod. Half the stuff causes an insta-crash.
+2Enter 157.7.205.136 in server ip
Secondary server is 157.7.214.47
For more info read the mod post.
+2I saw this in MP
+2AWESOME!!!!!
+2Now
I
Know
How
To
Format text
+2Thanks for your explanation.
@Graingy Addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. And some algebra ofc.
+1@MAINE yep!
+1@Graingy Yeah something like that. Also due to me trying to divide a fuselage (different front and back sizes) into a number of smaller ones that perfectly match the original (so I could have some cutouts for door hinges). The math was perfect, but the fuselages just didn't match. There were also some other issues related to that but it's been over a year and I don't remember the details.
+1@Graingy It theoretically was achievable, however the fuselages I calculated to create it didn't line up despite the math being correct.
+1@Graingy Calculations for fuselage values like width and height, as well as fill values for slicing.
+1@Graingy I did some calculations for fuselages that were mathematically correct. When I entered those numbers into the fuselages, they were not correct. This is due to SP meshes being weird.
+1@Graingy Math said some fuselages for the nose gear bay were perfect, but due to SP geometry being SP geometry they weren't. I couldn't fix it so I gave up and 3D modelled it.
+1@Graingy I tried in-game and the math wasn't mathing so I gave up.
+1@Graingy Because it was easier to 3D model them than build in SP, mainly for complex geometry.
+1@ReynaldoHeavyIndustries Still not sure what you mean.
+1@dINE From idle to 70% throttle is just an XML modded jet engine, although the high power sawtooth and the startup sounds are from a mod part I made.
+1@BluesynVN I can't lol I used the mods one for the screenshots. I get 10FPS in the designer with the 17k version and it takes 30 seconds to do anything.
+1@ReynaldoHeavyIndustries what do you mean?
+1@SimpleStudent SimpleChips
+1Change d=365 to d=0
+1@Randomplayer information
+1110 WPM, 96% accuracy. I seem to type using a modified form of the two index finger method, so a hybrid of touch typing and two finger typing.
+1@ThomasRoderick Thanks, updated.
+1