Opinions? You mean facts lol
I don't really see the F-22 as overrated, it's more like its the only relevant supermaneuverable 5th gen fighter at the moment. There's just a lot of J-20 and Su-57 simps here for some reason
@Ded Thank you!
I think we used a pretty similar technique for the airbrakes. I basically did that with sideways fuselage blocks and used rise to get the angle.
.
An F-2A would be interesting. I probably won't be able to convert this into one, but we'll see. If anything though, I'm probably gonna try to do an Su-27 or F-15 next to get more experience with these features on a different airframe.
I've thought about this too
Probably something like:
Throttle*clamp01((GS>a & GS<a+x))
Throttle can be changed to whatever you're using for the engine
a = Gear change speed
x = The smaller this is, the shorter the gear change
Add more *clamp01((GS>a & GS<a+x)) to add more gears
I don't know if car engines have throttleResponse as a variable, but if it does, set it to 1
@ollielebananiaCFSP Agreed
SP was never meant for builds with the level of detail and accuracy that the best people (not me) on the site can make. But there's always been an aesthetic to taking something simple and pushing it beyond its limits, hence why we get Bad Apple played on a Nokia and Reid Captain making piston engines in games that clearly didn't have them in mind.
Either way, this reminds me of when I moved from Besiege to SimplePlanes. I'll probably try FlyOut out, but SimplePlanes has too much charm for me to leave.
@Tookan "All warfare is based on deception."
+5- Vladimir Makarov
Cool
+2I wonder if there is a way to make it not rotate the other way when passing 180 degrees heading though
The FIA disliked that.
jk hope it goes well
@Farewellntchii Rooster literally used the force to get the bomb in
.
Also how did I not notice that fuel tank thing... That is actually inexcusable
@Rifimaka and you're exactly right
+2Swept wings are not great when it comes to low speed performance as well, which is kinda replicated in SP.
Unplayable
This why you can get multiple strikes before ban
Just don't let it happen again :)
Nicholas GOATifi 🇨🇦 🏆
+1@beenz Even better, set the activationGroup of the drone controls to !8. This will basically toggle between drone and carrier controls with AG8
+1We are varking, gentlemen
+2He chonky
+1Opinions? You mean facts lol
+3I don't really see the F-22 as overrated, it's more like its the only relevant supermaneuverable 5th gen fighter at the moment. There's just a lot of J-20 and Su-57 simps here for some reason
no hole :(
+7@FairFireFlight Yeah same. I was thinking about it for a while and then realized that this was an obvious solution.
CLAAAAAAAARKSOOOOON
+1@SteamPunkPilot I'll test it later
Impressive part efficiency!
+3@SteamPunkPilot i think you put an extra * because of the italics
Try
Pitch*clamp01((GS>50 & GS<50+1))*clamp01((GS>80 & GS<80+2)
& are more than symbols and < are less than
@SteamPunkPilot Yep
Not a Porsche (tm)
+1@HuskyDynamics01 Paths of Hate?
@WolfHunter9111 Yeah I'll leave the cockpit to you :)
+3In the mean time I did put the canopy frame lines so I guess you won't have to worry about those
Define the operation + on ℤ by a+b=a+b+2.
Then 9+10=9+10+2=21
Roach, check your heartbeat sensor.
+3@Dragoranos
Need For Speed Heat
Assetto Corsa
The Duality of Man
Is the number designation the horsepower?
@TheCommentaryGuy Oh those are 9X's lol
+1Imagine if the RIO gets JHMCS BF3 style
muh downforce
@IceCraftGaming Ngl I wouldn't trust an article like that lol
+2Both are pretty outdated platforms at this point imo
Andrewnium
+1fireAndForget
=True/False would be niceOne of the F-15 responders currently resides at the Pacific Coast Air Museum
+3@Ded Thank you!
+2I think we used a pretty similar technique for the airbrakes. I basically did that with sideways fuselage blocks and used rise to get the angle.
.
An F-2A would be interesting. I probably won't be able to convert this into one, but we'll see. If anything though, I'm probably gonna try to do an Su-27 or F-15 next to get more experience with these features on a different airframe.
Looks doable with FT
+2Adidas headlights
Get off the stage!
+1@TheCommentaryGuy Ye
+2Not being able to get the color bands right was also bothering me
@IceCraftGaming We'll see. Out of curiosity, ehat do you consider mobile friendly?
+2@donkski Hard maybe. But if I do one, it'll still be low fidelity
fixing auto roll be like
+9@Kaijogodzillafanx Tornado, MiG-23/27, F-111, B-1, Tu-160, Su-17/22: are we a joke to you?
+1You cannot see or feel a delta P situation
+1Once it's got you, it's got you
@BoiExist Try methods 2 3 or 4
+3@TheCommentaryGuy A-10 outdated reeeeeee
+1Or
Or
Or
@rexzion based
+1I've thought about this too
+2Probably something like:
Throttle*clamp01((GS>a & GS<a+x))
Throttle can be changed to whatever you're using for the engine
a = Gear change speed
x = The smaller this is, the shorter the gear change
Add more *clamp01((GS>a & GS<a+x)) to add more gears
I don't know if car engines have throttleResponse as a variable, but if it does, set it to 1
Huh. When I saw the first teaser I thought this plane didn't really have a British aesthetic
Guess I was right
AWACS?
@ollielebananiaCFSP Agreed
+3SP was never meant for builds with the level of detail and accuracy that the best people (not me) on the site can make. But there's always been an aesthetic to taking something simple and pushing it beyond its limits, hence why we get Bad Apple played on a Nokia and Reid Captain making piston engines in games that clearly didn't have them in mind.
Either way, this reminds me of when I moved from Besiege to SimplePlanes. I'll probably try FlyOut out, but SimplePlanes has too much charm for me to leave.