@ThatKindaWeeb Sometimes.
The Abrams build gave me a lot of practice with paneling so an may be F-117 is plausible...
Although I'm still planning to do the MiG-15 after this and maybe an F-86 to go with it
Phlight model and the rear landing gear are pretty wonky, but it looks pretty good.
Since you're starting to put weapons on your jets, you should start researching the loadouts. It's actually quite phun (Or at least I think it is.). Phantoms didn't carry Sparrows on the wings afaik.
You should also try taking a stab at making the Sparrows act like SARH missiles by sticking a guardian in them. And AGM-65's are Mavericks, not HARM's. That's the AGM-88.
Unless they are HARM's here and this is some E-G mishmash type thing?
Greetings, salutations fellow members of the SimplePlanes community.
May I humbly provide my inquiry on the subject matter of being notified of new virtual vehicular content? I do believe that the letter in question, T, the twentieth letter of the English alphabet, solely on its own feels quite lazy. Do you not have further commentary on these builds that you are so eagerly awaiting the release of? Do you not wish to provide your commentary? What is it that motivates you to expend the energy to momentarily pause your perusing of this internet forum and request a tag? Even with an excessively verbose statement as substitute, such sophistication of language is in vain and beauty of written English lost if it is copied and pasted and says no more than what hath already been accomplished through a single letter.
Thank you, and good day and good night.
𝓡𝓮𝓲𝓷𝓜𝓬𝓓𝓮𝓮𝓻
Judging from the spaghetti...
You should try multiplying instead of subtracting. Pitch*.5*(f(IAS))+Trim*.07+Roll*.5
Where f(IAS) is some function of your airspeed. This should be more gradual and less spazzy if f(IAS) doesn't involve the Condition ? True : False. A clamped linear or exponential function should do.
Now I wanna redo my typhoon...
Also, you should try making the targeting pod functional, it's really satisfying to track your targets and see them get smacked by a GBU
BVR capability? Probably even more important than snap maneuverability.
At least some level of stealth.
Extremely tough
I think survivability would be more important, which you mentioned. Better to not get hit at all when increasing armor enough to reliably stop modern weapon systems decreases performance.
Deployable in mass
As long as it doesn't compromise the quality of a single aircraft, I guess. But, generally, less is more. (Do more with less units) Of course, I'm no expert, so take that with a boulder of salt.
Oh, and ability to find and secure WMD's, AKA oil.
Every meme has 3 stages F:Funny at first U: Ironically funny because it's unfunny N:Nostalgic or straight up not funny
Andrewism got to stage 3 VERY quickly, and not in a good way
@UmbrellaCorporation Unfortunately, you can't.
But the smoke scales with the missile, so if you make the missile very small, the trail will be very hard to see.
@ThatKindaWeeb An unexpected turn, but a welcome one, I hope :)
Oh btw, I'll consider the MiG-15 next in queue after the current project. Fuselage-cutting should also help with getting the shapes on the F-86.
@ThatKindaWeeb Sometimes.
+3The Abrams build gave me a lot of practice with paneling so an may be F-117 is plausible...
Although I'm still planning to do the MiG-15 after this and maybe an F-86 to go with it
@rexzion I dunno, I'm juggling my hobbies with college. SP is really on/off for me right now.
If I had to take a guess, maybe late this month?
Congratulations
+2@rexzion sorry sometimes i forget i'm blind
still like frog feet tho (that would be cool)
'ery noice. Love the flight model.
Don't forget to disable collisions on your pylon stores!
@rexzion Not the next project in queue, but I do like me some frog feet
Phlight model and the rear landing gear are pretty wonky, but it looks pretty good.
+2Since you're starting to put weapons on your jets, you should start researching the loadouts. It's actually quite phun (Or at least I think it is.). Phantoms didn't carry Sparrows on the wings afaik.
You should also try taking a stab at making the Sparrows act like SARH missiles by sticking a guardian in them.
And AGM-65's are Mavericks, not HARM's. That's the AGM-88.
Unless they are HARM's here and this is some E-G mishmash type thing?
A simple addition that adds a lot
+1nice
It's a trick question. A circle is round and flat. What if it's both?
+7jk it's a donut obviously
There's a small bug with the newest version where you can't change the zoom when paused
is it me or are the roads slightly too small :/
This is 100% possible in SP, the lasers, the rocket boosters, the PSM, all of it.
+13It's got serious winterro and Walvis vibes
@Korzalerke 1. The inside mesh is not rendered (You can see through connected glass blocks)
+22. They break like glass
Kinda sorta
+2why turn when you can have THRUST
+2Greetings, salutations fellow members of the SimplePlanes community.
+6May I humbly provide my inquiry on the subject matter of being notified of new virtual vehicular content? I do believe that the letter in question, T, the twentieth letter of the English alphabet, solely on its own feels quite lazy. Do you not have further commentary on these builds that you are so eagerly awaiting the release of? Do you not wish to provide your commentary? What is it that motivates you to expend the energy to momentarily pause your perusing of this internet forum and request a tag? Even with an excessively verbose statement as substitute, such sophistication of language is in vain and beauty of written English lost if it is copied and pasted and says no more than what hath already been accomplished through a single letter.
Thank you, and good day and good night.
𝓡𝓮𝓲𝓷𝓜𝓬𝓓𝓮𝓮𝓻
Judging from the spaghetti...
+1You should try multiplying instead of subtracting.
Pitch*.5*(f(IAS))+Trim*.07+Roll*.5Where f(IAS) is some function of your airspeed. This should be more gradual and less spazzy if f(IAS) doesn't involve the
Condition ? True : False. A clamped linear or exponential function should do.Now I wanna redo my typhoon...
+1Also, you should try making the targeting pod functional, it's really satisfying to track your targets and see them get smacked by a GBU
@CarrotSlicingCat he always says T :P
+1T
+3BVR capability? Probably even more important than snap maneuverability.
At least some level of stealth.
I think survivability would be more important, which you mentioned. Better to not get hit at all when increasing armor enough to reliably stop modern weapon systems decreases performance.
As long as it doesn't compromise the quality of a single aircraft, I guess. But, generally, less is more. (Do more with less units)
Of course, I'm no expert, so take that with a boulder of salt.
Oh, and ability to find and secure WMD's, AKA oil.
@Nerfaddict but he has already made forum posts...
@ThatKindaWeeb I've been thinking about doing a morgan
+1But for the most part nope
@Bobyo Bouncing?
+2Pfft, APFSDS shatters like it's fragile depleted uranium ego.
"It's called a motor race."
"We went car racing."
@handitover Yeah, an unfortunate feature of resized wheels...
+1F-15 and Su-27
Imagine VR multiplayer with 32 people rowing that thing
+3Afaik there's no fix except putting the values back manually
+2It's pretty annoying
Every meme has 3 stages
+20F: Funny at first
U: Ironically funny because it's unfunny
N: Nostalgic or straight up not funny
Andrewism got to stage 3 VERY quickly, and not in a good way
@UmbrellaCorporation Unfortunately, you can't.
But the smoke scales with the missile, so if you make the missile very small, the trail will be very hard to see.
@SCPCalebkid Yep!
+1@CPTWilson Maybe
@UmbrellaCorporation I may or may not be able to provide assistance?
He is a manufacturer of doors
+13@WAR122 I do plan on upgrading this to other Abrams variants in the future
+1@ThatKindaWeeb An unexpected turn, but a welcome one, I hope :)
+1Oh btw, I'll consider the MiG-15 next in queue after the current project. Fuselage-cutting should also help with getting the shapes on the F-86.
A tag filter would help with that too. You could filter out the Rick or potential Andrew tag.
+3I don't know how hard that would be to implement though
@SyntheticL Come on, these WMD's won't find themselves!
+2grabs popcorn
+3@Beasthunter
+1This literally predicted the future...
+1@Inuyasha8215 "We can make a religion out of thi- No don't."
+5- Bill Wurtz
Can you 3d print a spider thomas?
+1This would probably be better as a forum post
+1I think a blue-on-blue just happened in the third pic
+1Nice M2!
What gun is the second one?
You made it sound like a WWE Intro
Hope you enjoy being a mod and good luck with your studies! @BaconAircraft
+1I wonder why they opted for side-by-side seats rather than something like what the Su-30 has
@CYCLONE2020131 Nice 👌
At least you're not Z
+1