Nothing to do with iOS as a platform. The issue is likely to do with either the hardware of an old device or a 1/1000 random coincidence. iOS and Apple devices have much more processing power behind them than their competitors. iOS optimisation also plays a big part in the performance. So, don’t blame iOS if it’s done nothing wrong. @DarthAbhinav
Well in pure power the MacBook outperforms the iPhone X completely. Also, it makes more sense to match the MacBook Pro 13” in its full form to the iPhone X in its full form, which is why I did that. Either way, the MacBook packs more powerful specifications. @RMark1
The MacBook Pro 13” 2017 (presumably that’s the one you’re talking about) has an integrated graphics chip and processor vastly superior to the iPhone X hardware. The Intel Iris Plus 650 and i7 (not to mention the 16GB RAM) are in a completely seperate weight class to an iPhone. You’ve probably seen some benchmark scores and assumed that those translate over into actual usage; which is a wrong. I think you might be mixing up the MacBook (which the iPhone X actually is more powerful than) and the MacBook Pro. I simply find it strange that you would not use your common sense to realise that a metal chassis less than 7mm thick could not house components more powerful than a fully fledged laptop. @RMark1
I don’t agree with this. The very fact that these don’t exist has led to lots of creativity among the SP community. The one thing (as CoolPeach said) that would be nice, would be the ability to link pistons and rotators to altitude and fuel usage.
You need to reduce the size of the Elevators. If the elevators are too big then an influx of air flow over the tailplane can cause the plane to roll heavily to the left or right. This also occurs if the elevators are rotated or angled at all. If you fix these then your plane should be alright.
No, I mean the actual look of them. Right now they look like tiny wheels on really long stilts. Make them look balanced and detailed like real landing gear.@BreadOnButter
I like most of the design and detailing but you should work on your landing gear (and I think you may have gone a little overboard with the engines). I think now is the right time to start branching out now into areas other than airliners (vehicles, helicopters... etc) to keep it interesting. Versatility is a great attribute! @BreadOnButter
Unfortunately this is just what happens with pistons and hinges at high speeds (or when they are supporting lots of mass). I think it is to do with the actual mass of the aircraft on which it is mounted. The reason I believe this is because I created a turret, and when mounted on a small aircraft it was perfectly stable; but when mounted it on a large cargo aircraft it wobbled when traversing. It’s just the unfortunate reality of SP physics, there’s nothing you can really do (at least to my knowledge).
I guess this is proof that the devs feature builds just based on looks. You need to work on the handling on your aircraft. There is no point uploading a build that has nice aesthetics if the functionality suffers.
Quite nice, but there is a lot of space for details that was wasted. Overall I like the aircraft but give more time to exterior detailing, it could really improve the aesthetics of this build. Still, good job.
Thanks a lot, I love hearing feedback on my designs @SledDriver
Oh ok right guys, thanks for the clearing that up. @Mod @Antho1213
Sorry, I can’t really understand what you’re saying. Can you explain more clearly what you just said? @Antho1213
I’d love to see this plane 3D printed
Very, very nice! Your building is improving a lot! I’ll spotlight as soon as I can
No, iPad Air 2 @BreadOnButter
No, iOS. @BreadOnButter
It’s a great replica. Thanks for the compliment! @SledDriver
Runs at over 60FPS on my iPad Air 2 (from 2014) with all high graphics. Anyway, wonderful build! Love the detailing and the overall design.
Revolutionary work here!
+1Great looks, functionality and design choices. Wonderful job!
300 points in 6 months isn’t very impressive.
+1Nothing to do with iOS as a platform. The issue is likely to do with either the hardware of an old device or a 1/1000 random coincidence. iOS and Apple devices have much more processing power behind them than their competitors. iOS optimisation also plays a big part in the performance. So, don’t blame iOS if it’s done nothing wrong. @DarthAbhinav
Why do role-players always call their countries names ending with an ‘ia’?
Wonderful job!
Thanks @DarthAbhinav
@ViridiCinis should be able to help. If you need any more modding help you should check out this post
Simple and effective, nice!
Definitely, the iPhone X’s specs are phenomenal. @RMark1
Hey @DarthAbhinav can you please make a version of this that’s x4 smaller? Thanks
Well in pure power the MacBook outperforms the iPhone X completely. Also, it makes more sense to match the MacBook Pro 13” in its full form to the iPhone X in its full form, which is why I did that. Either way, the MacBook packs more powerful specifications. @RMark1
The MacBook Pro 13” 2017 (presumably that’s the one you’re talking about) has an integrated graphics chip and processor vastly superior to the iPhone X hardware. The Intel Iris Plus 650 and i7 (not to mention the 16GB RAM) are in a completely seperate weight class to an iPhone. You’ve probably seen some benchmark scores and assumed that those translate over into actual usage; which is a wrong. I think you might be mixing up the MacBook (which the iPhone X actually is more powerful than) and the MacBook Pro. I simply find it strange that you would not use your common sense to realise that a metal chassis less than 7mm thick could not house components more powerful than a fully fledged laptop. @RMark1
I don’t know where you got that information but it is completely false. @RMark1 @Rawhide
Beautiful design, functions even better than it looks!
I don’t agree with this. The very fact that these don’t exist has led to lots of creativity among the SP community. The one thing (as CoolPeach said) that would be nice, would be the ability to link pistons and rotators to altitude and fuel usage.
+1You need to reduce the size of the Elevators. If the elevators are too big then an influx of air flow over the tailplane can cause the plane to roll heavily to the left or right. This also occurs if the elevators are rotated or angled at all. If you fix these then your plane should be alright.
Nice, but please change the title
I’m just not uploading anymore, I’m still active on the website @BreadOnButter
Nice design! A few more details might be nice but overall I like it @BreadOnButter
Ah, I see @ACMECo1940
No, I mean the actual look of them. Right now they look like tiny wheels on really long stilts. Make them look balanced and detailed like real landing gear.@BreadOnButter
Thanks for using my song in your biography :) @Pianoman
+1Why can’t you just make the letters?
Nice! Glad to hear it @BreadOnButter
I like most of the design and detailing but you should work on your landing gear (and I think you may have gone a little overboard with the engines). I think now is the right time to start branching out now into areas other than airliners (vehicles, helicopters... etc) to keep it interesting. Versatility is a great attribute! @BreadOnButter
Yes, that’s probably what he should have done, but I imagine he was in a hurry to get this message out. @Awsomur
Seriously? He’s trying to help people. A post like this could literally save someone life. @Awsomur
How exactly did you stop the wobbling?! This issue has been plaguing me for a long time! @MisterT
Sounds cool, I like the change!
This has been in SP for well over two years.
Unfortunately this is just what happens with pistons and hinges at high speeds (or when they are supporting lots of mass). I think it is to do with the actual mass of the aircraft on which it is mounted. The reason I believe this is because I created a turret, and when mounted on a small aircraft it was perfectly stable; but when mounted it on a large cargo aircraft it wobbled when traversing. It’s just the unfortunate reality of SP physics, there’s nothing you can really do (at least to my knowledge).
+1Very stable in-flight, wonderful camo, and nice attention to detail. Very impressive! I also liked the three gargantuan bombs sitting in the bomb bay!
Your builds are very simple and nowhere near a gold worthy rank yet. Try to add more detail, functionality and innovation into your designs.@koryg
Make a Boeing 2707
Glad you’re back! They have been done, but there is one other job I want you to do @ViridiCinis
That’s not true, there is a lot of extra detailing @jamesPLANESii
I guess this is proof that the devs feature builds just based on looks. You need to work on the handling on your aircraft. There is no point uploading a build that has nice aesthetics if the functionality suffers.
+1Quite nice, but there is a lot of space for details that was wasted. Overall I like the aircraft but give more time to exterior detailing, it could really improve the aesthetics of this build. Still, good job.
+1Just ask someone to mod the propellers fuel efficiency